Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "Vietnam War" to "Vietnam War"
m (Text replacement - "Dwight D. Eisenhower" to "Dwight D. Eisenhower")
m (Text replacement - "Vietnam War" to "Vietnam War")
Line 88: Line 88:
These activities affected MIT profoundly. A 1949 report noted the lack of "any great slackening in the pace of life at the Institute" to match the return to peacetime, remembering the "academic tranquility of the prewar years", though acknowledging the significant contributions of military research to the increased emphasis on graduate education and rapid growth of personnel and facilities.<ref>Lewis 1949, p. 49.</ref> The faculty doubled and the graduate student body quintupled during the presidential terms of [[Karl Taylor Compton]] (1930–1948), [[James Rhyne Killian]] (1948–1957), and chancellor [[Julius Adams Stratton]] (1952–1957), whose institution-building strategies shaped the expanding university. By the 1950s, MIT no longer simply benefited the industries with which it had worked for three decades, and it had developed closer working relationships with new patrons, philanthropic foundations and the federal government.<ref>Lecuyer, 1992</ref>
These activities affected MIT profoundly. A 1949 report noted the lack of "any great slackening in the pace of life at the Institute" to match the return to peacetime, remembering the "academic tranquility of the prewar years", though acknowledging the significant contributions of military research to the increased emphasis on graduate education and rapid growth of personnel and facilities.<ref>Lewis 1949, p. 49.</ref> The faculty doubled and the graduate student body quintupled during the presidential terms of [[Karl Taylor Compton]] (1930–1948), [[James Rhyne Killian]] (1948–1957), and chancellor [[Julius Adams Stratton]] (1952–1957), whose institution-building strategies shaped the expanding university. By the 1950s, MIT no longer simply benefited the industries with which it had worked for three decades, and it had developed closer working relationships with new patrons, philanthropic foundations and the federal government.<ref>Lecuyer, 1992</ref>


In late 1960s and early 1970s, student and faculty activists protested against the [[Vietnam War]] and MIT's defense research.<ref name="Ins and outs">{{cite news |title=The 'Ins' and 'Outs' at MIT |work=The New York Times |date=May 18, 1969 |last=Todd |first=Richard}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,900700,00.html |title=A Policy of Protest |date=February 28, 1969 |access-date=August 13, 2008 |magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081214153106/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,900700,00.html |archive-date=December 14, 2008}}</ref> In this period MIT's various departments were researching helicopters, smart bombs and counterinsurgency techniques for the war in Vietnam as well as guidance systems for nuclear missiles.<ref>[http://mitscienceforthepeople.weebly.com/uploads/4/0/9/8/40982869/review_panel_on_speciallaboratories_-_final_report_-_oct_1969.pdf ''MIT Review Panel on Special Laboratories Final Report'']; S.Leslie, ''The Cold War and American Science. The military-industrial complex at MITand Stanford''; [https://books.google.com/books?id=x3ertj1IcaAC M.Albert, ''Remembering Tomorrow''], pp.&nbsp;97–99; [http://tech.mit.edu/V92/PDF/V92-N21.pdf 'MIT may be dangerous to the world'] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170117064035/http://tech.mit.edu/V92/PDF/V92-N21.pdf |date=2017-01-17  }}, ''The Tech'', 28/4/72, p.&nbsp;5; [http://scienceandrevolution.org/blog/2016/7/8/why-smash-mit-1969-article-from-radical-student-magazine-the-old-mole 'Why Smash MIT?'] in I. Wallerstein, ''University Crisis Reader'', vol.&nbsp;2, pp.&nbsp;240–3; ''The Technology Review'', December 1969.</ref> The [[Union of Concerned Scientists]] was founded on March 4, 1969 during a meeting of faculty members and students seeking to shift the emphasis on military research toward environmental and social problems.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ucsusa.org/ucs/about/founding-document-1968-mit-faculty-statement.html |title=Founding Document: 1968 MIT Faculty Statement |access-date=August 12, 2008 |publisher=Union of Concerned Scientists, USA |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080115200053/http://www.ucsusa.org/ucs/about/founding-document-1968-mit-faculty-statement.html |archive-date=January 15, 2008}}</ref> MIT ultimately divested itself from the Instrumentation Laboratory and moved all classified research off-campus to the [[MIT Lincoln Laboratory]] facility in 1973 in response to the protests.<ref>{{cite news |title=Tension Over Issue of Defense Research |first=Fred |last=Hechinger |author-link=Fred Hechinger |date=November 9, 1969 |work=The New York Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=MIT Curb on Secret Projects Reflects Growing Antimilitary Feeling Among Universities' Researchers |first=William |last=Stevens |date=May 5, 1969 |work=The New York Times}}</ref> The student body, faculty, and administration remained comparatively unpolarized during what was a tumultuous time for many other universities.<ref name="Ins and outs"/> Johnson was seen to be highly successful in leading his institution to "greater strength and unity" after these times of turmoil.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/1999/johnson-0609.html |title=A tribute to MIT's Howard Johnson |first=David |last=Warsh |work=The Boston Globe |date=June 1, 1999 |access-date=April 4, 2007 |quote=At a critical time in the late 1960s, [[Howard Wesley Johnson|Johnson]] stood up to the forces of campus rebellion at MIT. Many university presidents were destroyed by the troubles. Only [[Edward Levi]], [[University of Chicago]] president, had comparable success guiding his institution to a position of greater strength and unity after the turmoil.}}</ref> However six MIT students were sentenced to prison terms at this time and some former student leaders, such as [[Michael Albert]] and [[George Katsiaficas]], are still indignant about MIT's role in military research and its suppression of these protests.<ref>[http://tech.mit.edu/V91/PDF/V91-N55.pdf 'Battering Ram: The occupation of the president's office', ''The Tech'', 14/12/71 p.&nbsp;4] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220321165602/http://tech.mit.edu/V91/PDF/V91-N55.pdf |date=2022-03-21  }} and [http://tech.mit.edu/V92/PDF/V92-N28.pdf ''The Tech'', 4/8/72] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230323060739/http://tech.mit.edu/V92/PDF/V92-N28.pdf |date=2023-03-23  }}; [https://books.google.com/books?id=x3ertj1IcaAC M.Albert, ''Remembering Tomorrow''] pp.&nbsp;9,&nbsp;97–99; [http://www.democracynow.org/2007/4/17/from_sds_to_life_after_capitalism 'Michael Albert interview', 17/4/07]; G.Katsiaficas, [http://www.eroseffect.com/articles/holdingthecenter.pdf 'Review of Howard Johnson's ''Holding the Center''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170117064154/http://www.eroseffect.com/articles/holdingthecenter.pdf |date=2017-01-17 }}; S.Shalom, [http://nova.wpunj.edu/newpolitics/issue23/shalom23.htm 'A flawed political biography'] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160808085048/http://nova.wpunj.edu/newpolitics/issue23/shalom23.htm |date=August 8, 2016 }}, ''New Politics'', Issue 23.</ref> ([[Richard Leacock]]'s film, ''November Actions'', records some of these tumultuous events.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nD4QZFubjaY ''November Actions'' YouTube extract]. See also: [https://webmuseum.mit.edu/detail.php?module=subjects&type=browse&id=10&term=Activism&page=1&kv=3&record=0&module=subjects MIT Museum photos of student activism, 1960s/1970s].</ref>)
In late 1960s and early 1970s, student and faculty activists protested against the Vietnam War and MIT's defense research.<ref name="Ins and outs">{{cite news |title=The 'Ins' and 'Outs' at MIT |work=The New York Times |date=May 18, 1969 |last=Todd |first=Richard}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,900700,00.html |title=A Policy of Protest |date=February 28, 1969 |access-date=August 13, 2008 |magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081214153106/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,900700,00.html |archive-date=December 14, 2008}}</ref> In this period MIT's various departments were researching helicopters, smart bombs and counterinsurgency techniques for the war in Vietnam as well as guidance systems for nuclear missiles.<ref>[http://mitscienceforthepeople.weebly.com/uploads/4/0/9/8/40982869/review_panel_on_speciallaboratories_-_final_report_-_oct_1969.pdf ''MIT Review Panel on Special Laboratories Final Report'']; S.Leslie, ''The Cold War and American Science. The military-industrial complex at MITand Stanford''; [https://books.google.com/books?id=x3ertj1IcaAC M.Albert, ''Remembering Tomorrow''], pp.&nbsp;97–99; [http://tech.mit.edu/V92/PDF/V92-N21.pdf 'MIT may be dangerous to the world'] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170117064035/http://tech.mit.edu/V92/PDF/V92-N21.pdf |date=2017-01-17  }}, ''The Tech'', 28/4/72, p.&nbsp;5; [http://scienceandrevolution.org/blog/2016/7/8/why-smash-mit-1969-article-from-radical-student-magazine-the-old-mole 'Why Smash MIT?'] in I. Wallerstein, ''University Crisis Reader'', vol.&nbsp;2, pp.&nbsp;240–3; ''The Technology Review'', December 1969.</ref> The [[Union of Concerned Scientists]] was founded on March 4, 1969 during a meeting of faculty members and students seeking to shift the emphasis on military research toward environmental and social problems.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ucsusa.org/ucs/about/founding-document-1968-mit-faculty-statement.html |title=Founding Document: 1968 MIT Faculty Statement |access-date=August 12, 2008 |publisher=Union of Concerned Scientists, USA |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080115200053/http://www.ucsusa.org/ucs/about/founding-document-1968-mit-faculty-statement.html |archive-date=January 15, 2008}}</ref> MIT ultimately divested itself from the Instrumentation Laboratory and moved all classified research off-campus to the [[MIT Lincoln Laboratory]] facility in 1973 in response to the protests.<ref>{{cite news |title=Tension Over Issue of Defense Research |first=Fred |last=Hechinger |author-link=Fred Hechinger |date=November 9, 1969 |work=The New York Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=MIT Curb on Secret Projects Reflects Growing Antimilitary Feeling Among Universities' Researchers |first=William |last=Stevens |date=May 5, 1969 |work=The New York Times}}</ref> The student body, faculty, and administration remained comparatively unpolarized during what was a tumultuous time for many other universities.<ref name="Ins and outs"/> Johnson was seen to be highly successful in leading his institution to "greater strength and unity" after these times of turmoil.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/1999/johnson-0609.html |title=A tribute to MIT's Howard Johnson |first=David |last=Warsh |work=The Boston Globe |date=June 1, 1999 |access-date=April 4, 2007 |quote=At a critical time in the late 1960s, [[Howard Wesley Johnson|Johnson]] stood up to the forces of campus rebellion at MIT. Many university presidents were destroyed by the troubles. Only [[Edward Levi]], [[University of Chicago]] president, had comparable success guiding his institution to a position of greater strength and unity after the turmoil.}}</ref> However six MIT students were sentenced to prison terms at this time and some former student leaders, such as [[Michael Albert]] and [[George Katsiaficas]], are still indignant about MIT's role in military research and its suppression of these protests.<ref>[http://tech.mit.edu/V91/PDF/V91-N55.pdf 'Battering Ram: The occupation of the president's office', ''The Tech'', 14/12/71 p.&nbsp;4] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220321165602/http://tech.mit.edu/V91/PDF/V91-N55.pdf |date=2022-03-21  }} and [http://tech.mit.edu/V92/PDF/V92-N28.pdf ''The Tech'', 4/8/72] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230323060739/http://tech.mit.edu/V92/PDF/V92-N28.pdf |date=2023-03-23  }}; [https://books.google.com/books?id=x3ertj1IcaAC M.Albert, ''Remembering Tomorrow''] pp.&nbsp;9,&nbsp;97–99; [http://www.democracynow.org/2007/4/17/from_sds_to_life_after_capitalism 'Michael Albert interview', 17/4/07]; G.Katsiaficas, [http://www.eroseffect.com/articles/holdingthecenter.pdf 'Review of Howard Johnson's ''Holding the Center''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170117064154/http://www.eroseffect.com/articles/holdingthecenter.pdf |date=2017-01-17 }}; S.Shalom, [http://nova.wpunj.edu/newpolitics/issue23/shalom23.htm 'A flawed political biography'] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160808085048/http://nova.wpunj.edu/newpolitics/issue23/shalom23.htm |date=August 8, 2016 }}, ''New Politics'', Issue 23.</ref> ([[Richard Leacock]]'s film, ''November Actions'', records some of these tumultuous events.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nD4QZFubjaY ''November Actions'' YouTube extract]. See also: [https://webmuseum.mit.edu/detail.php?module=subjects&type=browse&id=10&term=Activism&page=1&kv=3&record=0&module=subjects MIT Museum photos of student activism, 1960s/1970s].</ref>)


In the 1980s, there was more controversy at MIT over its involvement in SDI (space weaponry) and CBW (chemical and biological warfare) research.<ref>''The Tech'', [https://web.archive.org/web/20140825200321/http://tech.mit.edu/V108/PDF/V108-N26.pdf May 27, 1988, pp.&nbsp;2,&nbsp;11] and [https://web.archive.org/web/20160801050627/http://tech.mit.edu/V109/N6/glenn.06o.html February 24, 1989, p.&nbsp;5] and [https://web.archive.org/web/20140826010402/http://tech.mit.edu/V109/PDF/V109-N9.pdf March 7, 1989, 2, 16]; ''The Thistle'', [http://web.mit.edu/activities/thistle/v9/9.07/tv9.07.html Vol.&nbsp;9 No.&nbsp;7]; ''Science for the People'', Vol.&nbsp;20 [http://science-for-the-people.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/SftPv20n1s.pdf January/February 1988, pp.&nbsp;17–25, 41–2] and [http://science-for-the-people.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/SftPv20n2s.pdf March/April 1988, p.&nbsp;6].</ref> More recently, MIT's research for the military has included work on robots, drones and 'battle suits'.<ref>''MIT News'', [https://news.mit.edu/2015/cheetah-robot-lands-running-jump-0529 'MIT cheetah robot lands the running jump'] (2015) and [https://news.mit.edu/2012/boredom-and-unmanned-aerial-vehicles-1114 'Driving drones can be a drag'] (2012); [https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Releases/News-Release-View/Article/1044811/department-of-defense-announces-successful-micro-drone-demonstration 'Department of Defense Announces Successful Micro-Drone Demonstration'] (2017); ''MIT Technology Review'', [https://www.technologyreview.com/s/401391/the-soldier-of-tomorrow/ March 20, 2002].</ref>
In the 1980s, there was more controversy at MIT over its involvement in SDI (space weaponry) and CBW (chemical and biological warfare) research.<ref>''The Tech'', [https://web.archive.org/web/20140825200321/http://tech.mit.edu/V108/PDF/V108-N26.pdf May 27, 1988, pp.&nbsp;2,&nbsp;11] and [https://web.archive.org/web/20160801050627/http://tech.mit.edu/V109/N6/glenn.06o.html February 24, 1989, p.&nbsp;5] and [https://web.archive.org/web/20140826010402/http://tech.mit.edu/V109/PDF/V109-N9.pdf March 7, 1989, 2, 16]; ''The Thistle'', [http://web.mit.edu/activities/thistle/v9/9.07/tv9.07.html Vol.&nbsp;9 No.&nbsp;7]; ''Science for the People'', Vol.&nbsp;20 [http://science-for-the-people.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/SftPv20n1s.pdf January/February 1988, pp.&nbsp;17–25, 41–2] and [http://science-for-the-people.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/SftPv20n2s.pdf March/April 1988, p.&nbsp;6].</ref> More recently, MIT's research for the military has included work on robots, drones and 'battle suits'.<ref>''MIT News'', [https://news.mit.edu/2015/cheetah-robot-lands-running-jump-0529 'MIT cheetah robot lands the running jump'] (2015) and [https://news.mit.edu/2012/boredom-and-unmanned-aerial-vehicles-1114 'Driving drones can be a drag'] (2012); [https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Releases/News-Release-View/Article/1044811/department-of-defense-announces-successful-micro-drone-demonstration 'Department of Defense Announces Successful Micro-Drone Demonstration'] (2017); ''MIT Technology Review'', [https://www.technologyreview.com/s/401391/the-soldier-of-tomorrow/ March 20, 2002].</ref>