CargoAdmin, Bureaucrats, Moderators (CommentStreams), fileuploaders, Interface administrators, newuser, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators
5,223
edits
Federal Aviation Administration: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
m (Text replacement - "Reuters" to "Reuters") |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|OrganizationType=Executive Departments | |OrganizationType=Executive Departments | ||
|Mission=To provide the safest, most efficient aerospace system in the world by regulating civil aviation to promote safety, fostering air commerce, and supporting the development of a national airspace system that meets the needs of the future. The FAA aims to protect the public, the environment, and ensure the U.S. leads in global aviation. | |Mission=To provide the safest, most efficient aerospace system in the world by regulating civil aviation to promote safety, fostering air commerce, and supporting the development of a national airspace system that meets the needs of the future. The FAA aims to protect the public, the environment, and ensure the U.S. leads in global aviation. | ||
|ParentOrganization= | |ParentOrganization=Department of Transportation | ||
|TopOrganization=Department of Transportation | |||
|CreationLegislation=Federal Aviation Act of 1958 | |CreationLegislation=Federal Aviation Act of 1958 | ||
|Employees=45000 | |Employees=45000 | ||
| Line 32: | Line 33: | ||
| coordinates = {{coord|38|53|13|N|77|1|22|W|region:US-DC_type:landmark|display=inline,title}} | | coordinates = {{coord|38|53|13|N|77|1|22|W|region:US-DC_type:landmark|display=inline,title}} | ||
| employees = | | employees = | ||
| budget = | | budget = US$19.807 billion ([[Fiscal year|FY]]2024) | ||
| chief1_name = [[Michael Whitaker (government official)|Michael Whitaker]] | | chief1_name = [[Michael Whitaker (government official)|Michael Whitaker]] | ||
| chief1_position = [Administrator] | | chief1_position = [Administrator] | ||
| Line 99: | Line 100: | ||
The approaching era of [[Jet aircraft|jet]] travel (and a series of midair collisions—most notably the [[1956 Grand Canyon mid-air collision]]) prompted passage of the [[Federal Aviation Act of 1958]]. This legislation passed the CAA's functions to a new independent body, the Federal Aviation Agency. The act also transferred air safety regulation from the CAB to the FAA, and gave it sole responsibility for a joint civil-military system of air navigation and air traffic control. The FAA's first administrator, [[Elwood Richard Quesada|Elwood R. Quesada]], was a former [[United States Air Force|Air Force]] general and adviser to [[Dwight D. Eisenhower|President Eisenhower]]. | The approaching era of [[Jet aircraft|jet]] travel (and a series of midair collisions—most notably the [[1956 Grand Canyon mid-air collision]]) prompted passage of the [[Federal Aviation Act of 1958]]. This legislation passed the CAA's functions to a new independent body, the Federal Aviation Agency. The act also transferred air safety regulation from the CAB to the FAA, and gave it sole responsibility for a joint civil-military system of air navigation and air traffic control. The FAA's first administrator, [[Elwood Richard Quesada|Elwood R. Quesada]], was a former [[United States Air Force|Air Force]] general and adviser to [[Dwight D. Eisenhower|President Eisenhower]]. | ||
The same year witnessed the birth of the [[NASA|National Aeronautics and Space Administration]] (NASA), which was created in response to the | The same year witnessed the birth of the [[NASA|National Aeronautics and Space Administration]] (NASA), which was created in response to the Soviet Union (USSR) launch of the first manmade satellite. NASA assumed NACA's aeronautical research role. | ||
=== 1960s reorganization === | === 1960s reorganization === | ||
| Line 195: | Line 196: | ||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
===Conflicting roles=== | ===Conflicting roles=== | ||
The FAA has been cited as an example of [[regulatory capture]], "in which the airline industry openly dictates to its regulators its governing rules, arranging for not only beneficial regulation, but placing key people to head these regulators."<ref name="davidoff-regcap">{{cite news |last=Solomon |first=Steven Davidoff |title=The Government's Elite and Regulatory Capture |work=DealBook |publisher=The New York Times|date=June 11, 2010 |url=https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/06/11/the-governments-elite-and-regulatory-capture/ |access-date=July 28, 2019 |archive-date=January 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200120214649/https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/06/11/the-governments-elite-and-regulatory-capture |url-status=live}}</ref> Retired NASA Office of Inspector General Senior Special Agent [[Joseph Gutheinz]], who used to be a Special Agent with the [[Office of Inspector General for the Department of Transportation]] and with FAA Security, is one of the most outspoken critics of FAA. Rather than commend the agency for proposing a $10.2 million fine against Southwest Airlines for its failure to conduct mandatory inspections in 2008, he was quoted as saying the following in an | The FAA has been cited as an example of [[regulatory capture]], "in which the airline industry openly dictates to its regulators its governing rules, arranging for not only beneficial regulation, but placing key people to head these regulators."<ref name="davidoff-regcap">{{cite news |last=Solomon |first=Steven Davidoff |title=The Government's Elite and Regulatory Capture |work=DealBook |publisher=The New York Times|date=June 11, 2010 |url=https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/06/11/the-governments-elite-and-regulatory-capture/ |access-date=July 28, 2019 |archive-date=January 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200120214649/https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/06/11/the-governments-elite-and-regulatory-capture |url-status=live}}</ref> Retired NASA Office of Inspector General Senior Special Agent [[Joseph Gutheinz]], who used to be a Special Agent with the [[Office of Inspector General for the Department of Transportation]] and with FAA Security, is one of the most outspoken critics of FAA. Rather than commend the agency for proposing a $10.2 million fine against Southwest Airlines for its failure to conduct mandatory inspections in 2008, he was quoted as saying the following in an Associated Press story: "Penalties against airlines that violate FAA directives should be stiffer. At $25,000 per violation, Gutheinz said, airlines can justify rolling the dice and taking the chance on getting caught. He also said the FAA is often too quick to bend to pressure from airlines and pilots."<ref name="ap-mailtrib/msnbc" /> Other experts have been critical of the constraints and expectations under which the FAA is expected to operate. The dual role of encouraging aerospace travel and regulating aerospace travel are contradictory. For example, to levy a heavy penalty upon an airline for violating an FAA regulation which would impact their ability to continue operating would not be considered encouraging aerospace travel. | ||
On July 22, 2008, in the aftermath of the Southwest Airlines inspection scandal, a bill was unanimously approved in the [[United States House of Representatives|House]] to tighten regulations concerning airplane maintenance procedures, including the establishment of a whistleblower office and a two-year "cooling off" period that FAA inspectors or supervisors of inspectors must wait before they can work for those they regulated.<ref name="ainonline" /><ref>Congress.gov, "[http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.110hr6493 H.R.6493 - Aviation Safety Enhancement Act of 2008]". {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211001040721/https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/6493 |date=October 1, 2021 }}.</ref> The bill also required rotation of principal maintenance inspectors and stipulated that the word "customer" properly applies to the flying public, not those entities regulated by the FAA.<ref name="ainonline" /> The bill died in a Senate committee that year.<ref>Congress.gov, "[http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.110s3440 S.3440 - Aviation Safety Enhancement Act of 2008]". {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211001040738/https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-bill/3440 |date=October 1, 2021 }}.</ref> | On July 22, 2008, in the aftermath of the Southwest Airlines inspection scandal, a bill was unanimously approved in the [[United States House of Representatives|House]] to tighten regulations concerning airplane maintenance procedures, including the establishment of a whistleblower office and a two-year "cooling off" period that FAA inspectors or supervisors of inspectors must wait before they can work for those they regulated.<ref name="ainonline" /><ref>Congress.gov, "[http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.110hr6493 H.R.6493 - Aviation Safety Enhancement Act of 2008]". {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211001040721/https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/6493 |date=October 1, 2021 }}.</ref> The bill also required rotation of principal maintenance inspectors and stipulated that the word "customer" properly applies to the flying public, not those entities regulated by the FAA.<ref name="ainonline" /> The bill died in a Senate committee that year.<ref>Congress.gov, "[http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.110s3440 S.3440 - Aviation Safety Enhancement Act of 2008]". {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211001040738/https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-bill/3440 |date=October 1, 2021 }}.</ref> | ||
In September 2009, the FAA administrator issued a directive mandating that the agency use the term "customers" to refer to only the flying public.<ref>{{cite news |title=FAA will stop calling airlines 'customers' |work= | In September 2009, the FAA administrator issued a directive mandating that the agency use the term "customers" to refer to only the flying public.<ref>{{cite news |title=FAA will stop calling airlines 'customers' |work=USA Today |date=September 18, 2009 |url=https://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-09-17-faa-airline-customers_N.htm |access-date=October 17, 2009 |agency=Reuters |archive-date=December 24, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101224184815/http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-09-17-faa-airline-customers_N.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> | ||
===Lax regulatory oversight=== | ===Lax regulatory oversight=== | ||
In 2007, two FAA [[whistleblower]]s, inspectors Charalambe "Bobby" Boutris and Douglas E. Peters, alleged that Boutris said he attempted to ground Southwest after finding cracks in the [[fuselage]] of an [[aircraft]], but was prevented by supervisors he said were friendly with the airline.<ref name="latimes-faa">Johanna Neuman, [http://www.latimes.com/travel/la-trw-airlines4apr04,0,4935961.story "FAA's 'culture of coziness' targeted in airline safety hearing"], '' | In 2007, two FAA [[whistleblower]]s, inspectors Charalambe "Bobby" Boutris and Douglas E. Peters, alleged that Boutris said he attempted to ground Southwest after finding cracks in the [[fuselage]] of an [[aircraft]], but was prevented by supervisors he said were friendly with the airline.<ref name="latimes-faa">Johanna Neuman, [http://www.latimes.com/travel/la-trw-airlines4apr04,0,4935961.story "FAA's 'culture of coziness' targeted in airline safety hearing"], ''Los Angeles Times'' (April 3, 2008). {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130123163445/http://www.latimes.com/travel/la-trw-airlines4apr04,0,4935961.story |date=January 23, 2013 }}. Retrieved April 11, 2011.</ref> This was validated by a report by the [[United States Department of Transportation|Department of Transportation]] which found FAA managers had allowed [[Southwest Airlines]] to fly 46 airplanes in 2006 and 2007 that were overdue for safety inspections, ignoring concerns raised by inspectors. Audits of other airlines resulted in two airlines grounding hundreds of planes, causing thousands of flight cancellations.<ref name="ainonline">{{cite web |url-status=dead |first1=Paul |last1=Lowe |url=http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/aviation-international-news/2008-08-31/bill-proposes-distance-between-airlines-and-faa-regulators |title=Bill proposes distance between airlines and FAA regulators |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130115173911/http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/aviation-international-news/2008-08-31/bill-proposes-distance-between-airlines-and-faa-regulators |archive-date=January 15, 2013 |website=AINonline |date=September 1, 2008 |access-date=April 11, 2011}}</ref> The [[United States House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure|House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee]] held hearings in April 2008. [[Jim Oberstar]], former chairman of the committee, said its investigation uncovered a pattern of regulatory abuse and widespread regulatory lapses, allowing 117 aircraft to be operated commercially although not in compliance with [https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/ FAA safety rules].<ref name="latimes-faa" /> [[Jim Oberstar|Oberstar]] said there was a "culture of coziness" between senior FAA officials and the airlines and "a systematic breakdown" in the FAA's culture that resulted in "malfeasance, bordering on corruption".<ref name="latimes-faa" /> In 2008 the FAA proposed to fine Southwest $10.2 million for failing to inspect older planes for cracks,<ref name="ap-mailtrib/msnbc">{{cite web |first1=David |last1=Koenig |url=http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080307/BIZ/803070316/-1/rss05 |title=Southwest Airlines faces $10.2 million fine |website=[[Mail Tribune]] |agency=Associated Press |date=March 6, 2008 |access-date=April 11, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120925031746/http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080307/BIZ/803070316/-1/rss05 |archive-date= Sep 25, 2012 }}</ref> and in 2009 [[Southwest Airlines|Southwest]] and the FAA agreed that [[Southwest Airlines|Southwest]] would pay a $7.5 million penalty and would adopt new safety procedures, with the fine doubling if Southwest failed to follow through.<ref>John Hughes for Bloomberg News. March 2, 2009. [https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=avFzkpTRRnHc&refer=us Southwest Air Agrees to $7.5 Million Fine, FAA Says (Update2)] {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924190006/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=avFzkpTRRnHc&refer=us |date=September 24, 2015 }}</ref> | ||
===Changes to air traffic controller application process=== | ===Changes to air traffic controller application process=== | ||
| Line 224: | Line 225: | ||
===Boeing 737 MAX controversy=== | ===Boeing 737 MAX controversy=== | ||
{{See also|Boeing 737 MAX groundings}} | {{See also|Boeing 737 MAX groundings}} | ||
As a result of the March 10, 2019 [[Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302]] crash and the [[Lion Air Flight 610]] crash five months earlier, most airlines and countries began grounding the [[Boeing 737 MAX 8]] (and in many cases all MAX variants) due to safety concerns, but the FAA declined to ground MAX 8 aircraft operating in the U.S.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/12/africa/airlines-suspend-boeing-flights-intl/index.html |title=US and Canada are the only two nations still flying many Boeing 737 MAX planes |agency=CNN|date=March 12, 2019 |access-date=March 13, 2019 |archive-date=April 12, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190412025015/https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/12/africa/airlines-suspend-boeing-flights-intl/index.html |url-status=live}}</ref> On March 12, the FAA said that its ongoing review showed "no systemic performance issues and provides no basis to order grounding the aircraft."<ref name="crash"/> Some U.S. Senators called for the FAA to ground the aircraft until an investigation into the cause of the Ethiopian Airlines crash was complete.<ref name="crash">{{cite news |title=U.S. Senate to hold crash hearing as lawmakers urge grounding Boeing 737 MAX 8 |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ethiopia-airline-usa/u-s-senate-to-hold-crash-hearing-as-lawmakers-urge-grounding-boeing-737-max-8-idUSKBN1QT1WR |work=Reuters|date=March 12, 2019 |access-date=March 13, 2019 |archive-date=July 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190710175443/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ethiopia-airline-usa/u-s-senate-to-hold-crash-hearing-as-lawmakers-urge-grounding-boeing-737-max-8-idUSKBN1QT1WR |url-status=live}}</ref> U.S. Transportation Secretary [[Elaine Chao]] said that "If the FAA identifies an issue that affects safety, the department will take immediate and appropriate action."<ref>{{cite news |title=U.S. to mandate design changes on Boeing 737 MAX 8 after crashes |url=https://www.euronews.com/2019/03/12/us-to-mandate-design-changes-on-boeing-737-max-8-after-crashes |publisher=Euronews |date=March 12, 2019 |access-date=March 13, 2019 |archive-date=May 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502052942/https://www.euronews.com/2019/03/12/us-to-mandate-design-changes-on-boeing-737-max-8-after-crashes |url-status=live}}</ref> The FAA resisted grounding the aircraft until March 13, 2019, when it received evidence of similarities in the two accidents. By then, 51 other regulators had already grounded the plane,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-03-14 |title=Editorial: Why was the FAA so late to deplane from Boeing's 737 Max? |url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-trump-faa-737-max-grounded-20190314-story.html |access-date=2021-07-20 |website= | As a result of the March 10, 2019 [[Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302]] crash and the [[Lion Air Flight 610]] crash five months earlier, most airlines and countries began grounding the [[Boeing 737 MAX 8]] (and in many cases all MAX variants) due to safety concerns, but the FAA declined to ground MAX 8 aircraft operating in the U.S.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/12/africa/airlines-suspend-boeing-flights-intl/index.html |title=US and Canada are the only two nations still flying many Boeing 737 MAX planes |agency=CNN|date=March 12, 2019 |access-date=March 13, 2019 |archive-date=April 12, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190412025015/https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/12/africa/airlines-suspend-boeing-flights-intl/index.html |url-status=live}}</ref> On March 12, the FAA said that its ongoing review showed "no systemic performance issues and provides no basis to order grounding the aircraft."<ref name="crash"/> Some U.S. Senators called for the FAA to ground the aircraft until an investigation into the cause of the Ethiopian Airlines crash was complete.<ref name="crash">{{cite news |title=U.S. Senate to hold crash hearing as lawmakers urge grounding Boeing 737 MAX 8 |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ethiopia-airline-usa/u-s-senate-to-hold-crash-hearing-as-lawmakers-urge-grounding-boeing-737-max-8-idUSKBN1QT1WR |work=Reuters|date=March 12, 2019 |access-date=March 13, 2019 |archive-date=July 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190710175443/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ethiopia-airline-usa/u-s-senate-to-hold-crash-hearing-as-lawmakers-urge-grounding-boeing-737-max-8-idUSKBN1QT1WR |url-status=live}}</ref> U.S. Transportation Secretary [[Elaine Chao]] said that "If the FAA identifies an issue that affects safety, the department will take immediate and appropriate action."<ref>{{cite news |title=U.S. to mandate design changes on Boeing 737 MAX 8 after crashes |url=https://www.euronews.com/2019/03/12/us-to-mandate-design-changes-on-boeing-737-max-8-after-crashes |publisher=Euronews |date=March 12, 2019 |access-date=March 13, 2019 |archive-date=May 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502052942/https://www.euronews.com/2019/03/12/us-to-mandate-design-changes-on-boeing-737-max-8-after-crashes |url-status=live}}</ref> The FAA resisted grounding the aircraft until March 13, 2019, when it received evidence of similarities in the two accidents. By then, 51 other regulators had already grounded the plane,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-03-14 |title=Editorial: Why was the FAA so late to deplane from Boeing's 737 Max? |url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-trump-faa-737-max-grounded-20190314-story.html |access-date=2021-07-20 |website=Los Angeles Times |language=en-US |archive-date=July 20, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210720135818/https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-trump-faa-737-max-grounded-20190314-story.html |url-status=live}}</ref> and by March 18, 2019, all 387 aircraft in service were grounded. Three major U.S. airlines--[[Southwest Airlines|Southwest]], [[United Airlines|United]], and [[American Airlines]]—were affected by this decision.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/13/business/canada-737-max.html |title=Trump Announces Ban of Boeing 737 Max Flights |last1=Austen |first1=Ian |date=March 13, 2019 |work=The New York Times|access-date=March 13, 2019 |last2=Gebrekidan |first2=Selam |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=September 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190913163144/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/13/business/canada-737-max.html |url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
Further investigations also revealed that the FAA and Boeing had colluded on recertification test flights, attempted to cover up important information and that the FAA had retaliated against whistleblowers.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/18/22189609/faa-boeing-737-max-senate-report-coverup-tests-whistleblowers |title=FAA and Boeing manipulated 737 Max tests during recertification |date=December 18, 2020 |access-date=August 25, 2022 |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710123547/https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/18/22189609/faa-boeing-737-max-senate-report-coverup-tests-whistleblowers |url-status=live }}</ref> | Further investigations also revealed that the FAA and Boeing had colluded on recertification test flights, attempted to cover up important information and that the FAA had retaliated against whistleblowers.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/18/22189609/faa-boeing-737-max-senate-report-coverup-tests-whistleblowers |title=FAA and Boeing manipulated 737 Max tests during recertification |date=December 18, 2020 |access-date=August 25, 2022 |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710123547/https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/18/22189609/faa-boeing-737-max-senate-report-coverup-tests-whistleblowers |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||