Endangered Species Act of 1973: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "George W. Bush" to "George W. Bush"
m (Text replacement - "LII" to "Legal Information Institute")
m (Text replacement - "George W. Bush" to "George W. Bush")
 
Line 494: Line 494:
3. Within another year, a final determination (a final rule) must be made on whether to list the species. The final rule time limit may be extended for 6 months and listings may be grouped together according to similar geography, threats, habitat or taxonomy.
3. Within another year, a final determination (a final rule) must be made on whether to list the species. The final rule time limit may be extended for 6 months and listings may be grouped together according to similar geography, threats, habitat or taxonomy.


The annual rate of listing (i.e., classifying species as "threatened" or "endangered") increased steadily from the [[Gerald Ford|Ford]] administration (47 listings, 15 per year) through [[Jimmy Carter|Carter]] (126 listings, 32 per year), [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan]] (255 listings, 32 per year), [[George H. W. Bush]] (231 listings, 58 per year), and [[William Clinton|Clinton]] (521 listings, 65 per year) before decline to its lowest rate under [[George W. Bush]] (60 listings, 8 per year as of 5/24/08).<ref name=GreenwaldSuckling2006>{{harvc| first=Noah| last=Greenwald| first2=K.| last2=Suckling| first3=M.| last3=Taylor| year=2006| chapter=Factors affecting the rate and taxonomy of species listings under the U.S. Endangered Species Act| in1=Goble| in2=Scott| in3=Davis| pages=50–67}}</ref>
The annual rate of listing (i.e., classifying species as "threatened" or "endangered") increased steadily from the [[Gerald Ford|Ford]] administration (47 listings, 15 per year) through [[Jimmy Carter|Carter]] (126 listings, 32 per year), [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan]] (255 listings, 32 per year), [[George H. W. Bush]] (231 listings, 58 per year), and [[William Clinton|Clinton]] (521 listings, 65 per year) before decline to its lowest rate under George W. Bush (60 listings, 8 per year as of 5/24/08).<ref name=GreenwaldSuckling2006>{{harvc| first=Noah| last=Greenwald| first2=K.| last2=Suckling| first3=M.| last3=Taylor| year=2006| chapter=Factors affecting the rate and taxonomy of species listings under the U.S. Endangered Species Act| in1=Goble| in2=Scott| in3=Davis| pages=50–67}}</ref>


The rate of listing is strongly correlated with citizen involvement and mandatory timelines: as agency discretion decreases and citizen involvement increases (i.e. filing of petitions and lawsuits) the rate of listing increases.<ref name=GreenwaldSuckling2006/> Citizen involvement has been shown to identify species not moving through the process efficiently,<ref name=Puckett_etal2016/> and identify more imperiled species.<ref name="BrosiBiber2012">{{cite journal|last1=Brosi|first1=Berry J.|last2=Biber|first2=Eric G. N.|title=Citizen Involvement in the U.S. Endangered Species Act|journal=Science|date=2012|volume=337 |issue=6096|pages=802–803|pmid=22903999|s2cid=33599354 |doi=10.1126/science.1220660 |bibcode=2012Sci...337..802B}}</ref> The longer species are listed, the more likely they are to be classified as recovering by the FWS.<ref name=TaylorSuckling2005>{{cite journal |author1=Taylor, M. T. |author2=K. S. Suckling  |author3=R. R. Rachlinski |name-list-style=amp| title=The effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A quantitative analysis |journal=BioScience |year=2005 |volume=55 |issue=4 |pages=360–367 |url=http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/swcbd/programs/policy/ch/sub1.html |doi=10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:TEOTES]2.0.CO;2 |issn=0006-3568| doi-access=free}}</ref>
The rate of listing is strongly correlated with citizen involvement and mandatory timelines: as agency discretion decreases and citizen involvement increases (i.e. filing of petitions and lawsuits) the rate of listing increases.<ref name=GreenwaldSuckling2006/> Citizen involvement has been shown to identify species not moving through the process efficiently,<ref name=Puckett_etal2016/> and identify more imperiled species.<ref name="BrosiBiber2012">{{cite journal|last1=Brosi|first1=Berry J.|last2=Biber|first2=Eric G. N.|title=Citizen Involvement in the U.S. Endangered Species Act|journal=Science|date=2012|volume=337 |issue=6096|pages=802–803|pmid=22903999|s2cid=33599354 |doi=10.1126/science.1220660 |bibcode=2012Sci...337..802B}}</ref> The longer species are listed, the more likely they are to be classified as recovering by the FWS.<ref name=TaylorSuckling2005>{{cite journal |author1=Taylor, M. T. |author2=K. S. Suckling  |author3=R. R. Rachlinski |name-list-style=amp| title=The effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A quantitative analysis |journal=BioScience |year=2005 |volume=55 |issue=4 |pages=360–367 |url=http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/swcbd/programs/policy/ch/sub1.html |doi=10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:TEOTES]2.0.CO;2 |issn=0006-3568| doi-access=free}}</ref>