CargoAdmin, Bureaucrats, Moderators (CommentStreams), fileuploaders, Interface administrators, newuser, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators
5,230
edits
United States Federal Board for Vocational Education: Difference between revisions
United States Federal Board for Vocational Education (view source)
Revision as of 14:45, 31 January 2025
, 31 JanuaryText replacement - "Harry Truman" to "Harry Truman"
m (Text replacement - "Abraham Lincoln" to "Abraham Lincoln") |
m (Text replacement - "Harry Truman" to "Harry Truman") |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Disbandment with the George-Barden Act of 1946 == | == Disbandment with the George-Barden Act of 1946 == | ||
The George-Barden Act of 1946 was introduced by Georgia Senator [[Walter F. George]] and North Carolina Representative [[Graham Arthur Barden|Graham A. Barden]] and signed by President | The George-Barden Act of 1946 was introduced by Georgia Senator [[Walter F. George]] and North Carolina Representative [[Graham Arthur Barden|Graham A. Barden]] and signed by President Harry Truman.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Mobley|first=M. D.|date=1964|title=A Review of Federal Vocational-Education Legislation 1862-1963|journal=Theory into Practice|volume=3|issue=5|pages=167–170|issn=0040-5841|jstor=1475196|doi=10.1080/00405846409541920}}</ref> It improved the Smith-Hughs Act by incorporating the state to nation rural and farm population ratio<ref name=":2" /> | ||
With the passage of this act, the Smith-Hughs Act—and consequently the Federal Board for Vocational Education—disbanded due to opposing politics and organizational difficulties from within.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hillison|first=John|date=1995|title=The Coalition that Supported the Smith-Hughes Act or a Case for Strange Bedfellows|url=https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ504569.pdf|journal=Virginia Tech}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hillison|first=John|last2=Moore|first2=Gary|year=1993|title=The Federal Board for Vocational Education: Its Composition, Controversies, and Contributions|url=https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ477063|journal=Journal of Vocational and Technical Education|language=en|volume=10|issue=1|pages=21–29|issn=0010-3829}}</ref> Despite this, its efforts and accomplishments are still recognized and in effect in modern American vocational education. | With the passage of this act, the Smith-Hughs Act—and consequently the Federal Board for Vocational Education—disbanded due to opposing politics and organizational difficulties from within.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hillison|first=John|date=1995|title=The Coalition that Supported the Smith-Hughes Act or a Case for Strange Bedfellows|url=https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ504569.pdf|journal=Virginia Tech}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hillison|first=John|last2=Moore|first2=Gary|year=1993|title=The Federal Board for Vocational Education: Its Composition, Controversies, and Contributions|url=https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ477063|journal=Journal of Vocational and Technical Education|language=en|volume=10|issue=1|pages=21–29|issn=0010-3829}}</ref> Despite this, its efforts and accomplishments are still recognized and in effect in modern American vocational education. | ||