Department of Agriculture: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Project article|Organization=Department of Agriculture}}{{redirect|USDA}}
{{Organization
|OrganizationName=Department of Agriculture
|OrganizationType=Executive agency
|Mission=The mission of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is to provide leadership on food, agriculture, natural resources, rural development, nutrition, and related issues based on sound public policy, the best available science, and efficient management. USDA aims to ensure a safe, sufficient, and sustainable food supply, support rural communities, foster agricultural trade, protect natural resources, and promote good nutrition.<ref name="usdamission">U.S. Department of Agriculture. "About USDA". [https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/about-usda]</ref>
|ParentOrganization=Executive Office of the President
|TopOrganization=Executive Office of the President
|CreationLegislation=Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1862
|Employees=100000
|Budget=$248.2 billion
|OrganizationExecutive=Secretary of Agriculture
|Services=The USDA provides a wide array of services including farm loans, conservation assistance, food safety inspections, agricultural research, nutrition assistance programs (like SNAP), rural development, forestry management, and international agricultural trade support. It engages in economic analysis, policy development, and regulatory oversight to support agriculture and food systems.<ref name="usdamission"/>
|Regulations=USDA oversees numerous regulations related to food safety, animal and plant health, organic certification, conservation practices, agricultural marketing, and nutrition programs. This includes the enforcement of laws like the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the Poultry Products Inspection Act, and various farm program regulations under the Farm Bill. USDA also administers programs that set standards for agricultural commodities and products.<ref name="usdamission"/>
|HeadquartersLocation=38.88784, -77.02999
|HeadquartersAddress=1400 Independence Ave SW, Washington, DC 20250
|Website=https://www.usda.gov
|Wikipedia=United States Department of Agriculture
}}
{{Distinguish|FDA}}
{{Distinguish|FDA}}
{{Use American English|date=July 2022}}
 
{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2022}}
{{Infobox government agency
{{Infobox government agency
| agency_name    = United States<br />Department of Agriculture
| agency_name    = United States<br />Department of Agriculture
Line 21: Line 36:
| coordinates    = {{coord|38|53|17|N|77|1|48|W|type:landmark_region:US-DC|display=inline,title}}
| coordinates    = {{coord|38|53|17|N|77|1|48|W|type:landmark_region:US-DC|display=inline,title}}
| employees      = 105,778 (June 2007)
| employees      = 105,778 (June 2007)
| budget          = [[United States dollar|US$]]213 billion (2024)<ref name='budget'/>
| budget          = US$213 billion (2024)<ref name='budget'/>
| chief1_name    = [[Tom Vilsack]]
| chief1_name    = [[Tom Vilsack]]
| chief1_position = [[United States Secretary of Agriculture|Secretary]]
| chief1_position = [[United States Secretary of Agriculture|Secretary]]
Line 46: Line 61:
}}
}}


The '''United States Department of Agriculture''' ('''USDA''') is an [[United States federal executive departments|executive department]] of the [[Federal government of the United States|United States federal government]] that aims to meet the needs of [[commercial farming]] and livestock food production, promotes agricultural trade and production, works to assure [[food safety]], protects natural resources, fosters rural communities and works to end hunger in the United States and internationally. It is headed by the [[secretary of agriculture]], who reports directly to the [[president of the United States]] and is a member of the president's [[Cabinet of the United States|Cabinet]]. The current secretary is [[Tom Vilsack]], who has served since February 24, 2021.<ref>{{cite web|last=Good|first=Keith|date=2021-02-24|title=Senate Confirms Tom Vilsack as Secretary of Agriculture {{*}} Farm Policy News|url=https://origin.farmpolicynews.illinois.edu/2021/02/senate-confirms-tom-vilsack-as-secretary-of-agriculture/|access-date=2021-10-01|website=Farm Policy News|language=en-US|archive-date=February 19, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220219144302/https://origin.farmpolicynews.illinois.edu/2021/02/senate-confirms-tom-vilsack-as-secretary-of-agriculture/|url-status=dead}}</ref>
The '''United States Department of Agriculture''' ('''USDA''') is an [[United States federal executive departments|executive department]] of the [[Federal government of the United States|United States federal government]] that aims to meet the needs of commercial farming and livestock food production, promotes agricultural trade and production, works to assure food safety, protects natural resources, fosters rural communities and works to end hunger in the United States and internationally. It is headed by the secretary of agriculture, who reports directly to the [[president of the United States]] and is a member of the president's [[Cabinet of the United States|Cabinet]].  


Approximately 71% of the USDA's $213&nbsp;billion budget goes towards nutrition assistance programs administered by the [[Food and Nutrition Service]] (FNS). The largest component of the FNS budget is the [[Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program]] (formerly known as the 'Food Stamp' program), which is the cornerstone of USDA's nutrition assistance.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/HISTORY%20OF%20FNS.pdf |title=History of FNS |website=usda.gov |access-date=July 1, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160912141202/http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/HISTORY%20OF%20FNS.pdf |archive-date=2016-09-12 }}</ref> The [[United States Forest Service]] is the largest agency within the department, which administers [[List of national forests of the United States|national forests]] and [[national grassland]]s that together comprise about 25% of [[federal lands]].
Approximately 71% of the USDA's $213&nbsp;billion budget goes towards nutrition assistance programs administered by the [[Food and Nutrition Service]] (FNS). The largest component of the FNS budget is the [[Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program]] (formerly known as the 'Food Stamp' program), which is the cornerstone of USDA's nutrition assistance.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/HISTORY%20OF%20FNS.pdf |title=History of FNS |website=usda.gov |access-date=July 1, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160912141202/http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/HISTORY%20OF%20FNS.pdf |archive-date=2016-09-12 }}</ref> The [[United States Forest Service]] is the largest agency within the department, which administers national forests and national grasslands that together comprise about 25% of [[federal lands]].


==Overview==
==Overview==
Line 54: Line 69:


Farm Production and Conservation (FPAC)
Farm Production and Conservation (FPAC)
* FPAC Business Center
* [[Farm Production and Conservation Business Center]]
* [[Natural Resources Conservation Service]] (NRCS)
* [[Natural Resources Conservation Service]] (NRCS)
* [[Risk Management Agency]] (RMA)
* [[Risk Management Agency]] (RMA)
Line 88: Line 103:
<ref>{{cite web|title=USDA Agencies|url=https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/about-usda/mission-areas |website=USDA}}</ref>
<ref>{{cite web|title=USDA Agencies|url=https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/about-usda/mission-areas |website=USDA}}</ref>


Many of the programs concerned with the distribution of food and nutrition to people of the [[United States]] and providing [[nourishment]] as well as [[Nutrition Education|nutrition education]] to those in need are run by the [[Food and Nutrition Service]]. Activities in this program include the [[Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program]], which provides healthy food to over 40&nbsp;million low-income and homeless people each month.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/ |title=FNS Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) |date=2013-06-21 |access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref> USDA is a member of the [[United States Interagency Council on Homelessness]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.usich.gov/member_agency |title=United States Interagency Council on Homelessness |website=USICH |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120424055302/http://www.usich.gov/member_agency |archive-date=2012-04-24 }}</ref> where it is committed to working with other agencies to ensure these mainstream benefits have been accessed by those experiencing homelessness.
Many of the programs concerned with the distribution of food and nutrition to people of the [[United States]] and providing nourishment as well as nutrition education to those in need are run by the [[Food and Nutrition Service]]. Activities in this program include the [[Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program]], which provides healthy food to over 40&nbsp;million low-income and homeless people each month.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/ |title=FNS Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) |date=2013-06-21 |access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref> USDA is a member of the [[United States Interagency Council on Homelessness]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.usich.gov/member_agency |title=United States Interagency Council on Homelessness |website=USICH |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120424055302/http://www.usich.gov/member_agency |archive-date=2012-04-24 }}</ref> where it is committed to working with other agencies to ensure these mainstream benefits have been accessed by those experiencing homelessness.


The USDA also is concerned with assisting farmers and food producers with the sale of crops and food on both the domestic and world markets. It plays a role in overseas aid programs by providing surplus foods to developing countries. This aid can go through [[United States Agency for International Development|USAID]], foreign governments, international bodies such as [[World Food Program]], or approved nonprofits. The [[Agricultural Act of 1949]], section 416 (b) and [[Agricultural Trade Development and Assistance Act of 1954]], also known as [[Food for Peace]], provides the legal basis of such actions. The USDA is a partner of the [[World Cocoa Foundation]].
The USDA also is concerned with assisting farmers and food producers with the sale of crops and food on both the domestic and world markets. It plays a role in overseas aid programs by providing surplus foods to developing countries. This aid can go through [[United States Agency for International Development|USAID]], foreign governments, international bodies such as [[World Food Program]], or approved nonprofits. The [[Agricultural Act of 1949]], section 416 (b) and [[Agricultural Trade Development and Assistance Act of 1954]], also known as [[Food for Peace]], provides the legal basis of such actions. The USDA is a partner of the [[World Cocoa Foundation]].


==History==
==History==
{{Further|History of agriculture in the United States}}
[[File:Harvey Wiley, Chief Chemist of the Department of Agriculture’s Division of Chemistry (cropped).jpg|thumb|[[Harvey Washington Wiley]], Chief Chemist of the Department of Agriculture's Division of Chemistry (third from the right) with his staff in 1883|229x229px]]
The standard history is Gladys L. Baker, ed., ''Century of Service: The first 100 years of the United States Department of Agriculture'' (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1963).<ref>It is not copyright and is [https://archive.org/details/centuryofservice00unit online here for free download.].</ref>
The standard history is Gladys L. Baker, ed., ''Century of Service: The first 100 years of the United States Department of Agriculture'' (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1963).<ref>It is not copyright and is [https://archive.org/details/centuryofservice00unit online here for free download.].</ref>


Line 103: Line 116:


===History===
===History===
[[File:Main Building of the Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. (no original caption) - NARA - 512817.jpg|thumb|right|The first [[United States Department of Agriculture Building|Department of Agriculture Building]] on the National Mall around 1895|231x231px]]
On May 15, 1862, Abraham Lincoln established the independent Department of Agriculture through the [[Morrill Land-Grant Acts|Morrill Act]] to be headed by a commissioner without [[Cabinet of the United States|Cabinet]] status. Staffed by only eight employees, the department was charged with conducting research and development related to "agriculture, [[rural development]], [[aquaculture]] and human nutrition in the most general and comprehensive sense of those terms".<ref>{{Cite web |title=7 U.S. Code § 2201 – Establishment of Department |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/2201 |access-date=2024-02-07 |website=LII / Legal Information Institute |language=en}}</ref> Agriculturalist [[Isaac Newton (agriculturalist)|Isaac Newton]] was appointed to be the first commissioner.<ref>12 Stat. 387, now codified at [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/07/2201- 7 U.S.C. § 2201].</ref> Lincoln called it the "people's department", since over half of the nation, at the time, was directly or indirectly involved in [[agriculture]] or [[agribusiness]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Salvador |first1=Ricardo |last2=Bittman |first2=Mark |title=Opinion: Goodbye, U.S.D.A., Hello, Department of Food and Well-Being |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/03/opinion/usda-agriculture-secretary-biden.html |access-date=10 December 2020 |work=The New York Times |date=4 December 2020}}</ref>
[[File:USDA Bldg., Washington, D.C. IMG 4787.JPG|thumb|right|The [[Jamie L. Whitten Building]] in [[Washington D.C.]] is the current USDA headquarters.|234x234px]]
On May 15, 1862, [[Abraham Lincoln]] established the independent Department of Agriculture through the [[Morrill Land-Grant Acts|Morrill Act]] to be headed by a commissioner without [[Cabinet of the United States|Cabinet]] status. Staffed by only eight employees, the department was charged with conducting research and development related to "agriculture, [[rural development]], [[aquaculture]] and human nutrition in the most general and comprehensive sense of those terms".<ref>{{Cite web |title=7 U.S. Code § 2201 – Establishment of Department |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/2201 |access-date=2024-02-07 |website=LII / Legal Information Institute |language=en}}</ref> Agriculturalist [[Isaac Newton (agriculturalist)|Isaac Newton]] was appointed to be the first commissioner.<ref>12 Stat. 387, now codified at [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/07/2201- 7 U.S.C. § 2201].</ref> Lincoln called it the "people's department", since over half of the nation, at the time, was directly or indirectly involved in [[agriculture]] or [[agribusiness]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Salvador |first1=Ricardo |last2=Bittman |first2=Mark |title=Opinion: Goodbye, U.S.D.A., Hello, Department of Food and Well-Being |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/03/opinion/usda-agriculture-secretary-biden.html |access-date=10 December 2020 |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=4 December 2020}}</ref>


In 1868, the department moved into the new [[United States Department of Agriculture Building|Department of Agriculture Building]] in Washington, designed by famed D.C. architect [[Adolf Cluss]]. Located on the [[National Mall]] between 12th Street and 14th SW, the department had offices for its staff and the entire width of the Mall up to B Street NW to plant and experiment with plants.<ref>Evening Star – June 18, 1868 – page 4 – column 4</ref>
In 1868, the department moved into the new Department of Agriculture Building in Washington, designed by famed D.C. architect Adolf Cluss. Located on the National Mall between 12th Street and 14th SW, the department had offices for its staff and the entire width of the Mall up to B Street NW to plant and experiment with plants.<ref>Evening Star – June 18, 1868 – page 4 – column 4</ref>


In the 1880s, varied advocacy groups were lobbying for Cabinet representation. Business interests sought a [[Department of Commerce and Industry]], and farmers tried to raise the Department of Agriculture to Cabinet rank. In 1887, the [[United States House of Representatives|House of Representatives]] and [[United States Senate|Senate]] passed separate bills giving Cabinet status to the Department of Agriculture and Labor, but the bill was defeated in [[conference committee]] after farm interests objected to the addition of labor. Finally, in 1889 the Department of Agriculture was given cabinet-level status.<ref>25 Stat 659 (February 9, 1889)</ref>
In the 1880s, varied advocacy groups were lobbying for Cabinet representation. Business interests sought a Department of Commerce and Industry, and farmers tried to raise the Department of Agriculture to Cabinet rank. In 1887, the [[United States House of Representatives|House of Representatives]] and [[United States Senate|Senate]] passed separate bills giving Cabinet status to the Department of Agriculture and Labor, but the bill was defeated in conference committee after farm interests objected to the addition of labor. Finally, in 1889 the Department of Agriculture was given cabinet-level status.<ref>25 Stat 659 (February 9, 1889)</ref>


In 1887, the [[Hatch Act of 1887|Hatch Act]] provided for the federal funding of [[agricultural experiment station]]s in each state. The [[Smith-Lever Act of 1914]] then funded [[cooperative extension service]]s in each state to teach agriculture, [[home economics]], and other subjects to the public. With these and similar provisions, the USDA reached out to every county of every state.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Danbom |first1=David B. |title=The Agricultural Experiment Station and Professionalization: Scientists' Goals for Agriculture |journal=Agricultural History |date=1986 |volume=60 |issue=2 |pages=246–255 |jstor=3743443}} </ref>
In 1887, the [[Hatch Act of 1887|Hatch Act]] provided for the federal funding of [[agricultural experiment station]]s in each state. The [[Smith-Lever Act of 1914]] then funded [[cooperative extension service]]s in each state to teach agriculture, home economics, and other subjects to the public. With these and similar provisions, the USDA reached out to every county of every state.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Danbom |first1=David B. |title=The Agricultural Experiment Station and Professionalization: Scientists' Goals for Agriculture |journal=Agricultural History |date=1986 |volume=60 |issue=2 |pages=246–255 |jstor=3743443}} </ref>


===New Deal era===
===New Deal era===
By the year 1933, the department was well established in Washington and very well known in rural America. In the agricultural field the picture was different. Statisticians created a comprehensive data-gathering arm in the Division of Crop and Livestock Estimates. Secretary Henry Wallace, a statistician, further strengthened the expertise by introducing sampling techniques. Professional economists ran a strong Bureau of Agricultural Economics. Most important was the agricultural experiment station system, a network of state partners in the land-grant colleges, which in turn operated a large field service in direct contact with farmers in practically every rural county. The department worked smoothly with a nationwide, well-organized pressure group, the [[American Farm Bureau Federation]]. It represented the largest commercial growers before Congress.<ref>David M. Kennedy, ''Freedom from fear: The American people in depression and war, 1929–1945'' (1999). p 203.</ref>
By the year 1933, the department was well established in Washington and very well known in rural America. In the agricultural field the picture was different. Statisticians created a comprehensive data-gathering arm in the Division of Crop and Livestock Estimates. Secretary Henry Wallace, a statistician, further strengthened the expertise by introducing sampling techniques. Professional economists ran a strong Bureau of Agricultural Economics. Most important was the agricultural experiment station system, a network of state partners in the land-grant colleges, which in turn operated a large field service in direct contact with farmers in practically every rural county. The department worked smoothly with a nationwide, well-organized pressure group, the [[American Farm Bureau Federation]]. It represented the largest commercial growers before Congress.<ref>David M. Kennedy, ''Freedom from fear: The American people in depression and war, 1929–1945'' (1999). p 203.</ref>


As late as the [[Great Depression]], farm work occupied a fourth of Americans. Indeed, many young people who moved to the cities in the prosperous 1920s returned to the family farm after the depression caused unemployment after 1929. The USDA helped ensure that food continued to be produced and distributed to those who needed it, assisted with loans for small landowners, and provided technical advice. Its [[Bureau of Home Economics]], established in 1923, published shopping advice and recipes to stretch family budgets and make food go farther.<ref name="Square Meal">{{cite book |last1=Ziegelman |first1=Jane |last2=Coe |first2=Andrew |title=A Square Meal: A Culinary History of the Great Depression |date=2016 |publisher=HarperCollins |isbn=978-0-06-221641-0 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/squaremealculina0000zieg }}</ref>
As late as the Great Depression, farm work occupied a fourth of Americans. Indeed, many young people who moved to the cities in the prosperous 1920s returned to the family farm after the depression caused unemployment after 1929. The USDA helped ensure that food continued to be produced and distributed to those who needed it, assisted with loans for small landowners, and provided technical advice. Its [[Bureau of Home Economics]], established in 1923, published shopping advice and recipes to stretch family budgets and make food go farther.<ref name="Square Meal">{{cite book |last1=Ziegelman |first1=Jane |last2=Coe |first2=Andrew |title=A Square Meal: A Culinary History of the Great Depression |date=2016 |publisher=HarperCollins |isbn=978-0-06-221641-0 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/squaremealculina0000zieg }}</ref>


=== Modern times ===
=== Modern times ===
On August 27, 2018, the USDA announced it would be providing U.S. farmers with a farm aid package totaling $4.7&nbsp;billion in direct payments to American farmers. This package is meant to offset the losses farmers are expected to incur from retaliatory tariffs placed on American exports during the [[Trump tariffs]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Agriculture Department Will Pay $4.7 Billion To Farmers Hit In Trade War |url= https://www.npr.org/2018/08/28/642525831/agriculture-dept-will-pay-4-7-billion-to-farmers-hit-in-trade-war|website=npr |access-date= 27 March 2023 }}</ref>
On August 27, 2018, the USDA announced it would be providing U.S. farmers with a farm aid package totaling $4.7&nbsp;billion in direct payments to American farmers. This package is meant to offset the losses farmers are expected to incur from retaliatory tariffs placed on American exports during the Trump tariffs.<ref>{{cite web |title=Agriculture Department Will Pay $4.7 Billion To Farmers Hit In Trade War |url= https://www.npr.org/2018/08/28/642525831/agriculture-dept-will-pay-4-7-billion-to-farmers-hit-in-trade-war|website=npr |access-date= 27 March 2023 }}</ref>


On 7 February 2022, the USDA announced the Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities, a $1 billion program that will test and verify the benefits of climate-friendly agricultural practices.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Erickson |first1=Britt |title=USDA commits $1 billion to climate-smart agriculture |url=https://cen.acs.org/food/agriculture/USDA-commits-1-billion-climate/100/i6 |work=[[Chemical & Engineering News]]}}</ref>
On 7 February 2022, the USDA announced the Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities, a $1 billion program that will test and verify the benefits of climate-friendly agricultural practices.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Erickson |first1=Britt |title=USDA commits $1 billion to climate-smart agriculture |url=https://cen.acs.org/food/agriculture/USDA-commits-1-billion-climate/100/i6 |work=[[Chemical & Engineering News]]}}</ref>


In October 2022, the USDA announced a $1.3 billion debt relief program for about 36,000 farmers who had fallen behind on loan payments or facing foreclosures. The provisions in the [[Inflation Reduction Act of 2022]] set aside $3.1 billion to help such farmers with high-risk operations caused by USDA-backed loans.<ref>{{cite news |last=Pitt |first=David |date=2022-10-18 |title=USDA announces $1 billion debt relief for 36,000 farmers |url=https://apnews.com/article/biden-health-covid-iowa-us-department-of-agriculture-a520df60c52a704ec98098d56cf2ea18 |work=[[Associated Press]]}}</ref>
In October 2022, the USDA announced a $1.3 billion debt relief program for about 36,000 farmers who had fallen behind on loan payments or facing foreclosures. The provisions in the [[Inflation Reduction Act of 2022]] set aside $3.1 billion to help such farmers with high-risk operations caused by USDA-backed loans.<ref>{{cite news |last=Pitt |first=David |date=2022-10-18 |title=USDA announces $1 billion debt relief for 36,000 farmers |url=https://apnews.com/article/biden-health-covid-iowa-us-department-of-agriculture-a520df60c52a704ec98098d56cf2ea18 |work=Associated Press}}</ref>


==Organization and Component Staff Level==
==Organization and Component Staff Level==
Line 254: Line 265:
| 99,137
| 99,137
|}
|}
[[File:Consumer Reports - product testing - brine test for canned peas (cropped).jpg|thumb|right|A nutrition researcher considers canned peas.|262x262px]]
===Inactive Departmental Services===
===Inactive Departmental Services===
* [[Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service]] (ASCS) (became part of the [[Farm Service Agency]] in 1994)
* [[Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service]] (ASCS) (became part of the [[Farm Service Agency]] in 1994)
Line 261: Line 270:
* Soil Conservation Service (SCS) renamed [[Natural Resources Conservation Service]]
* Soil Conservation Service (SCS) renamed [[Natural Resources Conservation Service]]
* Section of Vegetable Pathology, Division of Botany (1887–90)<ref name="BPISAE">{{cite web|url=https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/054.html |title=Records of the Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils, and Agricultural Engineering [BPISAE&#93;: Administrative History |publisher=Archives.gov |access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref>
* Section of Vegetable Pathology, Division of Botany (1887–90)<ref name="BPISAE">{{cite web|url=https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/054.html |title=Records of the Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils, and Agricultural Engineering [BPISAE&#93;: Administrative History |publisher=Archives.gov |access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref>
** Renamed Division of Vegetable Pathology (1890–95)<ref name="BPISAE" />
* Renamed Division of Vegetable Pathology (1890–95)<ref name="BPISAE" />
 
===Full list===
# [[Agricultural Marketing Service]] (AMS)
# [[Agricultural Research Service]] (ARS)
# [[Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service]] (APHIS)
# [[Economic Research Service]] (ERS)
# [[Farm Service Agency]] (FSA)
# [[Food and Nutrition Service]] (FNS)
# [[Food Safety and Inspection Service]] (FSIS)
# [[Foreign Agricultural Service]] (FAS)
# [[Forest Service]] (FS)
# [[National Agricultural Statistics Service]] (NASS)
# [[National Institute of Food and Agriculture]] (NIFA)
# [[Natural Resources Conservation Service]] (NRCS)
# [[Risk Management Agency]] (RMA)
# [[Rural Business-Cooperative Service]] (RBS)
# [[Rural Housing Service]] (RHS)
# [[Rural Utilities Service]] (RUS)
# [[Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration]] (GIPSA) [Note: Merged into AMS in some contexts]
# [[Office of the Chief Economist]] (OCE)
# [[Office of the Chief Financial Officer (Department of Agriculture)|Office of the Chief Financial Officer]] (OCFO)
# [[Office of the Chief Information Officer (Department of Agriculture)|Office of the Chief Information Officer]] (OCIO)
# [[Office of Communications (Department of Agriculture)|Office of Communications]] (OC)
# [[Office of General Counsel (Department of Agriculture)|Office of the General Counsel]] (OGC)
# [[Office of Inspector General (Department of Agriculture)|Office of Inspector General]] (OIG)
# [[Office of Partnerships and Public Engagement (Department of Agriculture)|Office of Partnerships and Public Engagement]] (OPPE)
# [[Office of Tribal Relations (Department of Agriculture)|Office of Tribal Relations]] (OTR)
# [[National Appeals Division]] (NAD)
# [[Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion]] (CNPP)
# [[United States National Finance Center|National Finance Center]] (NFC)


==Discrimination==
==Discrimination==
[[File:Black American Protesters Align Outside Lafayette Park Across White House.jpg|alt=Black farmers protest at Lafayette Park across from the White House in Washington, D.C. on September 22, 1997. Protesters are holding-up signs labeled with phrases. "Don't take our land", "Equal Justice is the Law", and more but they are cute off.|thumb|265x265px|Black farmers protested at Lafayette Park across from the White House, on September 22, 1997, against USDA.]]
Allegations have been made that throughout the agency's history its personnel have discriminated against farmers of various backgrounds, denying them loans and access to other programs well into the 1990s.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=General Accounting Office |url=http://www.gao.gov/archive/1999/rc99038.pdf |title=USDA – Problems Continue to Hinder the Timely Processing of Discrimination Complaints |date=January 1999 |access-date=October 16, 2007 |archive-date=February 24, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090224210610/http://www.gao.gov/archive/1999/rc99038.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> The effect of this discrimination caused a reduction in the number of African American farmers in the United States.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Brooks |first=Roy L. |title=Atonement and Forgiveness: A New Model for Black Reparations |year=2004 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |isbn=0-520-24813-9 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/atonementforgive0000broo/page/7 7–8] |url=https://archive.org/details/atonementforgive0000broo/page/7 }}</ref> Though African American farmers have been the most hit by discriminatory actions by the USDA, women, [[Native Americans in the United States|Native Americans]], Hispanics, and other minorities have experienced discrimination in a variety of forms at the hands of the USDA. The majority of these discriminatory actions have occurred through the [[Farm Service Agency]], which oversees loan and assistance programs to farmers.<ref name="heinonline">''Garcia v. Vilsack: A Policy and Legal Analysis of a USDA Discrimination Case'', ''HeinOnline'', <nowiki>https://heinonline-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/HOL/P?h=hein.crs/crsmthmatal0001&i=11</nowiki>.</ref>
Allegations have been made that throughout the agency's history its personnel have discriminated against farmers of various backgrounds, denying them loans and access to other programs well into the 1990s.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=General Accounting Office |url=http://www.gao.gov/archive/1999/rc99038.pdf |title=USDA – Problems Continue to Hinder the Timely Processing of Discrimination Complaints |date=January 1999 |access-date=October 16, 2007 |archive-date=February 24, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090224210610/http://www.gao.gov/archive/1999/rc99038.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> The effect of this discrimination caused a reduction in the number of [[African Americans|African American]] farmers in the United States.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Brooks |first=Roy L. |title=Atonement and Forgiveness: A New Model for Black Reparations |year=2004 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |isbn=0-520-24813-9 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/atonementforgive0000broo/page/7 7–8] |url=https://archive.org/details/atonementforgive0000broo/page/7 }}</ref> Though [[African Americans|African American]] farmers have been the most hit by discriminatory actions by the USDA, women, [[Native Americans in the United States|Native Americans]], [[Hispanic]]s, and other minorities have experienced discrimination in a variety of forms at the hands of the USDA. The majority of these discriminatory actions have occurred through the [[Farm Service Agency]], which oversees loan and assistance programs to farmers.<ref name="heinonline" />


In response to the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court's]] ruling of unconstitutionality of the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]], [[United States Congress|Congress]] enacted the [[Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act of 1936]], which established the [[Soil Conservation Service]] (SCS) which provided service to private landowners and encouraged subsidies that would relieve soil from excessive farming. The SCS in its early days were hesitant, especially in Southern jurisdictions, to hire Black conservationists. Rather than reaching out to Black students in universities for interviews and job opportunities, students had to reach out for the few opportunities granted to Black conservationists.<ref>Helms, Douglas. "Eroding the Color Line: The Soil Conservation Service and the Civil Rights Act of 1964." ''Agricultural History'', vol. 65, no. 2, Agricultural History Society, 1991, pp. 35–53, <nowiki>http://www.jstor.org/stable/3743706</nowiki>.</ref>
In response to the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court's]] ruling of unconstitutionality of the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]], [[United States Congress|Congress]] enacted the [[Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act of 1936]], which established the [[Soil Conservation Service]] (SCS) which provided service to private landowners and encouraged subsidies that would relieve soil from excessive farming. The SCS in its early days were hesitant, especially in Southern jurisdictions, to hire Black conservationists. Rather than reaching out to Black students in universities for interviews and job opportunities, students had to reach out for the few opportunities granted to Black conservationists.<ref>Helms, Douglas. "Eroding the Color Line: The Soil Conservation Service and the Civil Rights Act of 1964." ''Agricultural History'', vol. 65, no. 2, Agricultural History Society, 1991, pp. 35–53, <nowiki>http://www.jstor.org/stable/3743706</nowiki>.</ref>


As part of the 1964 [[Civil Rights Act]], the USDA formally ended racial segregation among its staff.<ref name="Johnson2011">{{cite journal|last1=Johnson|first1=Kimberley S.|date=October 2011|title=Racial Orders, Congress, and the Agricultural Welfare State, 1865–1940|journal=Studies in American Political Development|volume=25|issue=2|pages=143–161|doi=10.1017/S0898588X11000095|doi-access=free}}</ref> In the 1999 ''[[Pigford v. Glickman]]'' class-action lawsuit brought by African American farmers, the USDA agreed to a billion-dollar settlement due to its patterns of discrimination in the granting of loans and subsidies to black farmers.<ref name="Johnson2011" /> In 2011, a second round of payouts, ''Pigford II,'' was appropriated by Congress for $1.25 billion, although this payout, far too late to support the many who desperately needed financial assistance during 1999 lawsuit, only comes out to around $250,000 per farmer.<ref>{{cite news|date=3 September 2021|title=United States: Black US Farmers Awaiting Billions in Promised Debt Relief|work=Asia News Monitor|location=Bangkok|id={{ProQuest|2568289864}}}}</ref>
As part of the 1964 [[Civil Rights Act]], the USDA formally ended racial segregation among its staff.<ref name="Johnson2011">{{cite journal|last1=Johnson|first1=Kimberley S.|date=October 2011|title=Racial Orders, Congress, and the Agricultural Welfare State, 1865–1940|journal=Studies in American Political Development|volume=25|issue=2|pages=143–161|doi=10.1017/S0898588X11000095|doi-access=free}}</ref> In the 1999 ''Pigford v. Glickman'' class-action lawsuit brought by African American farmers, the USDA agreed to a billion-dollar settlement due to its patterns of discrimination in the granting of loans and subsidies to black farmers.<ref name="Johnson2011" /> In 2011, a second round of payouts, ''Pigford II,'' was appropriated by Congress for $1.25 billion, although this payout, far too late to support the many who desperately needed financial assistance during 1999 lawsuit, only comes out to around $250,000 per farmer.<ref>{{cite news|date=3 September 2021|title=United States: Black US Farmers Awaiting Billions in Promised Debt Relief|work=Asia News Monitor|location=Bangkok|id={{ProQuest|2568289864}}}}</ref>


A March 17, 2006 letter from the GAO about the Pigford Settlement indicated that "the court noted that USDA disbanded its Office of Civil Rights in 1983, and stopped responding to claims of discrimination."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-06-469r.pdf |title=GAO-06-469R Pigford Settlement: The Role of the Court-Appointed Monitor |date= |access-date=2022-03-02}}</ref>
A March 17, 2006 letter from the GAO about the Pigford Settlement indicated that "the court noted that USDA disbanded its Office of Civil Rights in 1983, and stopped responding to claims of discrimination."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-06-469r.pdf |title=GAO-06-469R Pigford Settlement: The Role of the Court-Appointed Monitor |date= |access-date=2022-03-02}}</ref>
===''Pigford v. Glickman''===
{{main|Pigford v. Glickman}}
Following long-standing concerns, black farmers joined a [[class action]] discrimination suit against the USDA filed in federal court in 1997.<ref name="CRS">{{cite web|author1=Tadlock Cowan |author2=Jody Feder |date=14 June 2011|title=The Pigford Cases: USDA Settlement of Discrimination Suits by Black Farmers|url=http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/crs/RS20430.pdf|access-date=1 December 2011|publisher=Congressional Research Service}}</ref> An attorney called it "the most organized, largest civil rights case in the history of the country."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/race_relations/jan-june99/farmers_3-2.html |title=PBS The News Hour (1999) |publisher=PBS |access-date=2013-12-29 |archive-date=December 30, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131230234723/http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/race_relations/jan-june99/farmers_3-2.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> Also in 1997, black farmers from at least five states held protests in front of the USDA headquarters in [[Washington, D.C.]]<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C7QOUqVlu5IC |title=Homecoming: The Story of African-American Farmers |author=Charlene Gilbert |author2=Quinn Eli |publisher=Beacon Press |date=2002 |access-date=2013-12-29|isbn=978-0-8070-0963-5 }}</ref> Protests in front of the USDA were a strategy employed in later years as the black farmers sought to keep national attention focused on the plight of the black farmers. Representatives of the [[National Black Farmers Association]] met with President [[Bill Clinton]] and other administration officials at the [[White House]]. And NBFA's president testified before the [[United States House Committee on Agriculture]].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FywV4yVN5iIC |title=Treatment of minority and limited resource producers by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: ... |publisher=U.S. G.P.O. |date=Jan 1, 1997 |access-date=2013-12-29|isbn=978-0-16-055410-0 }}</ref>
In ''[[Pigford v. Glickman]]'', U.S. Federal District Court Judge [[Paul L. Friedman]] approved the settlement and consent decree on April 14, 1999.<ref name="CRS" /> The settlement recognized discrimination against 22,363 black farmers, but the NBFA would later call the agreement incomplete because more than 70,000 were excluded.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jLKMFlLhCx0C |title=Where Rebels Roost... Mississippi Civil Rights Revisited |author=M. Susan Orr Klopfer |author2=Fred Klopfer |author3=Barry Klopfer |publisher=Lulu Press |date=2005 |access-date=2013-12-29|isbn=978-1-4116-4102-0 }}{{self-published inline|date=June 2023}}</ref> Nevertheless, the settlement was deemed to be the largest-ever civil rights class action settlement in American history. Lawyers estimated the value of the settlement to be more than $2&nbsp;billion.<ref name="nytimes1">{{cite news|date=April 15, 1999|title=Judge Approves Settlement for Black Farmers|newspaper=New York Times|agency=ASSOCIATED PRESS|url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C05E0D9143BF936A25757C0A96F958260|access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref> Some farmers would have their debts forgiven.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1046266 |title=Black Farmers Lawsuit |publisher=NPR |date=March 2, 1999 |access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref> Judge Friedman appointed a monitor to oversee the settlement.<ref name="nytimes1" /> Farmers in Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Georgia were among those affected by the settlement.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1355/is_2_97/ai_58411585 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120711212707/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1355/is_2_97/ai_58411585 |archive-date=2012-07-11 |title=Southern farmers among those affected by court case}}</ref>
The NBFA's president was invited to testify before congress on this matter numerous times following the settlement, including before the [[United States Senate Committee on Agriculture]] on September 12, 2000, when he testified that many farmers had not yet received payments and others were left out of the settlement. It was later revealed that one DoJ staff "general attorney" was unlicensed while she was handling black farmers' cases.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0205/021105lb.htm |title=Unlicensed Hire |author=Daniel Pulliam |website=GOVEXEC.com |date=February 11, 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050416092038/http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0205/021105lb.htm |archive-date=2005-04-16 }}</ref> NBFA called for all those cases to be reheard.<ref name="nationalblackfarmersassociation.org"/> The ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' reported in 2004 that the result of such longstanding USDA discrimination was that black farmers had been forced out of business at a rate three times faster than white farmers. In 1920, 1 in 7 U.S. farmers was African-American, and by 2004 the number was 1 in 100. USDA spokesman Ed Loyd, when acknowledging that the USDA loan process was unfair to minority farmers, had claimed it was hard to determine the effect on such farmers.<ref>{{cite news|first= Andrew |last=Martin |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/2004/08/08/usda-discrimination-accused-of-withering-black-farmers/ |title=USDA discrimination accused of withering black farmers |work=Chicago Tribune |date=2004-08-08 |access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref>
In 2006 the [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) issued a report highly critical of the USDA in its handling of the black farmers cases.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5362406 |title=Black Farmers Follow Up on USDA Grievances|publisher=National Public Radio |date=25 Apr 2006 |access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref> NBFA continued to lobby Congress to provide relief. NBFA's [[John Boyd (farmer)]] secured congressional support for legislation that would provide $100&nbsp;million in funds to settle late-filer cases. In 2006 a bill was introduced into the House of Representatives and later the Senate by Senator [[George Felix Allen]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/29/AR2006092900152.html |title=Allen Unveils Bill to Help Black Farmers |agency=Associated Press |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=September 29, 2006 |access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref> In 2007 Boyd testified before the [[United States House Committee on the Judiciary]] about this legislation.<ref name="nationalblackfarmersassociation.org">{{cite web |title=About us |url= https://www.nationalblackfarmersassociation.org/about_us|website=National Black Farmers Association |access-date= 27 March 2023 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230510033642/https://www.nationalblackfarmersassociation.org/about_us |archive-date= May 10, 2023 }}</ref> As the organization was making headway by gathering Congressional supporters in 2007 it was revealed that some USDA Farm Services Agency employees were engaged in activities aimed at blocking Congressional legislation that would aid the black farmers.<ref>{{cite web |date=August 8, 2007 |url=http://obama.senate.gov/press/070808-usda_improper_lobbying/ |title=Obama: USDA Should Not Undermine Legislation to Help Black Farmers |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081111011207/http://obama.senate.gov/press/070808-usda_improper_lobbying/ |archive-date=2008-11-11 }}</ref> [[Barack Obama]], then a U.S. Senator, lent his support to the black farmers' issues in 2007.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/as-champion-of-black-farmers-obama-could-win-southern-votes-2007-09-19.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011004824/http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/as-champion-of-black-farmers-obama-could-win-southern-votes-2007-09-19.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=October 11, 2007 |title=The Hill newspaper (2007) |publisher=Thehill.com |access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref> A bill co-sponsored by Obama passed the Senate in 2007.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://obama.senate.gov/news/071217-senate_votes_to_1/ |title=Senate Votes to Reopen Black Farmers' Lawsuits |date=December 17, 2007 |agency=Associated Press |author=Ben Evans |access-date=2013-04-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081030221920/http://obama.senate.gov/news/071217-senate_votes_to_1/ |archive-date=2008-10-30 }}</ref>
In early June 2008 hundreds of black farmers, denied a chance to have their cases heard in the ''Pigford'' settlement, filed a new lawsuit against USDA.<ref>{{cite news |author=Ben Evans |agency=Associated Press |url=http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Jun04/0,4670,BlackFarmersLawsuit,00.html |title=Black farmers file new suit against USDA |publisher=FOXNews.com |date=June 4, 2008 |access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref> The Senate and House versions of the black farmers bill, reopening black farmers discrimination cases, became law in June 2008.<ref name="BenEvans1">{{cite news|author=Ben Evans|date=2008-06-28|title=Reopening black farmers' suits could cost billions|newspaper=USA Today|agency=Associated Press|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-06-28-1736680923_x.htm|access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref> Some news reports said that the new law could affect up to 74,000 black farmers.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17722777 |title=Help Ahead for Black Farmers |publisher=NPR |date=December 31, 2007 |access-date=2013-12-29}}</ref> In October 2008, the GAO issued a report criticizing the USDA's handling of discrimination complaints.<ref>{{cite news |last=Etter |first=Lauren |url=http://s.wsj.net/article/SB122472492972861173.html |title=USDA Faulted Over Minority Farmers |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |date=2008-10-23 |access-date=2013-12-29 |archive-date=June 26, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130626070624/http://s.wsj.net/article/SB122472492972861173.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> The GAO recommended an oversight review board to examine civil rights complaints.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/22/AR2008102203198.html |title=USDA Action On Bias Complaints Is Criticized |newspaper=The Washington Post |date= 2008-10-23 |access-date=2013-12-29 |first=Darryl |last=Fears}}</ref>
After numerous public rallies and an intensive NBFA member lobbying effort, Congress approved and Obama signed into law in December 2010 legislation that set aside $1.15&nbsp;billion to resolve the outstanding black farmers' cases. NBFA's John W. Boyd Jr., attended the bill-signing ceremony at the White House.<ref name="nationalblackfarmersassociation.org"/> As of 2013, 90,000 African-American, Hispanic, female and Native American farmers had filed claims. It was reported that some had been found fraudulent, or transparently bogus. In [[Maple Hill, North Carolina|Maple Hill]], North Carolina by 2013, the number of successful claimants was four times the number of farms with 1 out of 9 African-Americans being paid, while "claimants were not required [by the USDA] to present documentary evidence that they had been unfairly treated or had even tried to farm." Lack of documentation is an issue complicated by the USDA practice of discarding denied applications after three years.<ref>{{cite news |title=U.S. Opens Spigot After Farmers Claim Discrimination |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/26/us/farm-loan-bias-claims-often-unsupported-cost-us-millions.html |access-date=April 26, 2013 |newspaper=The New York Times |date=April 25, 2013 |author=Sharon LaFraniere |quote=...claimants were not required to present documentary evidence that they had been unfairly treated or had even tried to farm.}}</ref>
=== Keepseagle v. Vilsack ===
In 1999, [[Native Americans in the United States|Native American farmers]], discriminated in a similar fashion to black farmers, filed a [[Class action|class-action]] lawsuit against the USDA alleging [[loan discrimination]] under the [[Equal Credit Opportunity Act|ECOA]] and the [[Administrative Procedure Act (United States)|APA]]. This case relied heavily on its predecessor, [[Pigford v. Glickman]], in terms of the reasoning it set forth in the lawsuit.<ref name="heinonline">''Garcia v. Vilsack: A Policy and Legal Analysis of a USDA Discrimination Case'', ''HeinOnline'', <nowiki>https://heinonline-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/HOL/P?h=hein.crs/crsmthmatal0001&i=11</nowiki>.</ref> Eventually, a settlement was reached between the plaintiffs and the USDA to the amount of up to $760 million, awardable through individual [[damages]] claims.<ref>{{cite web|title=Native American Farmer and Rancher Class Action Settlement – Keepseagle v. Vilsack |website=Natural Resources Conservation Service Louisiana |url=https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/la/newsroom/?cid=nrcs141p2_015776 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200525003913/https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/la/newsroom/?cid=nrcs141p2_015776 |archive-date=2020-05-25}}</ref> These claims could be used for monetary relief, debt relief, and/or tax relief. The filing period began June 29, 2011 and lasted 180 days.<ref name="autogenerated2">"Keepseagle settlement filing period open". Delta Farm Press, July 26, 2011. advance-lexis-com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/api/document?collection=news&id=<nowiki>urn:contentItem:53F3-DGH1-DY7H-500C-00000-00&context=1516831</nowiki>. Accessed November 28, 2021.</ref> Track A claimants would be eligible for up to $50,000, whereas Track B claimants would be eligible for up to $250,000 with a higher standard of proof.<ref name="autogenerated2"/>
=== Garcia v. Vilsack ===
{{Main|Garcia v. Vilsack}}
In 2000, similar to [[Pigford v. Glickman]], a [[Class action|class-action]] lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of Hispanic farmers alleging that the USDA discriminated against them in terms of credit transactions and disaster benefits, in direct violation of [[Equal Credit Opportunity Act|ECOA]]. As per the settlement, $1.33 billion is available for compensation in awards of up to $50,000 or $250,000, while an additional $160 million is available in [[debt relief]].<ref name="heinonline"/>
=== ''Love v. Vilsack'' ===
{{Main|Love v. Vilsack}}
In 2001, similar to [[Garcia v. Vilsack]], a [[Class action|class-action]] lawsuit was filed in the same court alleging [[discrimination]] on the basis of gender. A Congressional response to the lawsuit resulted in the passing of the [[Equality for Women Farmers Act]], which created a system that would allow for allegations of gender discrimination to be heard against the USDA and enable claims for damages.<ref name="heinonline"/>


== Environmental justice initiatives ==
== Environmental justice initiatives ==
In their 2012 [[environmental justice]] strategy, the [[U.S. Department of Agriculture]] (USDA) stated an ongoing desire to integrate environmental justice into its core mission and operations. In 2011, [[United States Secretary of Agriculture|Secretary of Agriculture]] [[Tom Vilsack]] emphasized the USDA's focus on [[Environmental justice|EJ]] in rural communities around the United States, as well as connecting with [[Native Americans in the United States|Indigenous Tribes]] and ensuring they understand and receive their environmental rights. USDA does fund programs with social and environmental equity goals; however, it has no staff dedicated solely to EJ.
In their 2012 environmental justice strategy, the [[U.S. Department of Agriculture]] (USDA) stated an ongoing desire to integrate environmental justice into its core mission and operations. In 2011, [[United States Secretary of Agriculture|Secretary of Agriculture]] Tom Vilsack emphasized the USDA's focus on EJ in rural communities around the United States, as well as connecting with [[Native Americans in the United States|Indigenous Tribes]] and ensuring they understand and receive their environmental rights. USDA does fund programs with social and environmental equity goals; however, it has no staff dedicated solely to EJ.


=== Background ===
=== Background ===
On February 16, 1994, [[Bill Clinton|President Clinton]] issued [[Executive Order 12898]], "Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations."<!-- AutoEd: rm unicode ctrl char w/no win-1252 mapping, intent unknown --> [[Executive Order 12898]] requires that achieving EJ must be part of each federal agency's mission. Under [[Executive Order 12898]] federal agencies must:
On February 16, 1994, [[Bill Clinton|President Clinton]] issued [[Executive Order 12898]], "Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations."<!-- AutoEd: rm unicode ctrl char w/no win-1252 mapping, intent unknown --> Executive Order 12898 requires that achieving EJ must be part of each federal agency's mission. Under Executive Order 12898 federal agencies must:


# enforce all health and environmental statutes in areas with minority and low-income populations;
# enforce all health and environmental statutes in areas with minority and low-income populations;
# ensure [[public participation]];
# ensure public participation;
# improve research and data collection relating to the health and environment of minority and low-income populations; and
# improve research and data collection relating to the health and environment of minority and low-income populations; and
# identify differential patterns of [[Resource consumption|consumption of natural resources]] among minority and low-income populations.
# identify differential patterns of consumption of natural resources among minority and low-income populations.
The Executive Order also created an Interagency Working Group (IWG) consisting of 11 heads of departments and agencies.<ref>{{cite web|title=Summary of Executive Order 12898 – Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations|date=February 22, 2013|url=https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-executive-order-12898-federal-actions-address-environmental-justice |website=Environmental Protection Agency}}</ref>
The Executive Order also created an Interagency Working Group (IWG) consisting of 11 heads of departments and agencies.<ref>{{cite web|title=Summary of Executive Order 12898 – Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations|date=February 22, 2013|url=https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-executive-order-12898-federal-actions-address-environmental-justice |website=Environmental Protection Agency}}</ref>


==== 2012 Environmental Justice Strategy ====
==== 2012 Environmental Justice Strategy ====
On February 7, 2012, the USDA released a final Environmental Justice Strategic Plan identifying new and updated goals and performance measures beyond what USDA identified in a 1995 EJ strategy that was adopted in response to E.O. 12898.<ref name="ftn10">USDA, Strategic Plan, http://www.dm.usda.gov/hmmd/FinalUSDAEJSTRATScan_1.pdf {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120226184928/http://www.dm.usda.gov/hmmd/FinalUSDAEJSTRATScan_1.pdf|date=2012-02-26}}</ref> Generally, USDA believes its existing technical and financial assistance programs provide solutions to environmental inequity, such as its initiatives on education, [[Food Deserts in the United States|food deserts]], and economic development in impacted communities.
On February 7, 2012, the USDA released a final Environmental Justice Strategic Plan identifying new and updated goals and performance measures beyond what USDA identified in a 1995 EJ strategy that was adopted in response to E.O. 12898.<ref name="ftn10">USDA, Strategic Plan, http://www.dm.usda.gov/hmmd/FinalUSDAEJSTRATScan_1.pdf {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120226184928/http://www.dm.usda.gov/hmmd/FinalUSDAEJSTRATScan_1.pdf|date=2012-02-26}}</ref> Generally, USDA believes its existing technical and financial assistance programs provide solutions to environmental inequity, such as its initiatives on education, food deserts, and economic development in impacted communities.


Natural Resources and Environment Under Secretary Harris Sherman is the political appointee generally responsible for USDA's EJ strategy, with Patrick Holmes, a senior staffer to the Under Secretary, playing a coordinating role. USDA has no staff dedicated solely to EJ.<ref name="ftn68">Holmes interview.</ref>
Natural Resources and Environment Under Secretary Harris Sherman is the political appointee generally responsible for USDA's EJ strategy, with Patrick Holmes, a senior staffer to the Under Secretary, playing a coordinating role. USDA has no staff dedicated solely to EJ.<ref name="ftn68">Holmes interview.</ref>
Line 321: Line 331:


==== Tribal development ====
==== Tribal development ====
USDA has had a role in implementing [[Michelle Obama]]'s ''[[Let's Move]]'' campaign in tribal areas by increasing [[Bureau of Indian Education]] schools' participation in federal nutrition programs, by developing community gardens on tribal lands, and developing tribal food policy councils.<ref name="ftn38">USDA, Strategic Plan at 6.</ref>
USDA has had a role in implementing Michelle Obama's ''Let's Move'' campaign in tribal areas by increasing [[Bureau of Indian Education]] schools' participation in federal nutrition programs, by developing community gardens on tribal lands, and developing tribal food policy councils.<ref name="ftn38">USDA, Strategic Plan at 6.</ref>


More than $6.2 billion in [[USDA Rural Development|Rural Development]] funding has been allocated for community infrastructure in [[Indian country]] and is distributed via 47 state offices that altogether cover the entire continental [[United States]], [[Hawaii]], and [[Alaska]].<ref name="ftn68" /> Such funding has been used for a variety of reasons:
More than $6.2 billion in [[USDA Rural Development|Rural Development]] funding has been allocated for community infrastructure in Indian country and is distributed via 47 state offices that altogether cover the entire continental [[United States]], [[Hawaii]], and [[Alaska]].<ref name="ftn68" /> Such funding has been used for a variety of reasons:


===== Rural housing=====
===== Rural housing=====
Line 342: Line 352:
===== Business and cooperative programs=====
===== Business and cooperative programs=====


*increased access to [[broadband]] connections
*increased access to broadband connections
*tribal workplace development and employment opportunities
*tribal workplace development and employment opportunities
*sustainable renewable energy development
*sustainable renewable energy development
Line 354: Line 364:
*reliable and affordable water and wastewater systems
*reliable and affordable water and wastewater systems
*financing electric systems
*financing electric systems
*integrating electric [[Smart grid|smart-grid]] technologies<ref>{{cite web|title=Collaborating for Prosperity With American Indians and Alaska Natives|url=https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo129049/508_RD_TribalReport_2019.pdf |website=Federal Depository Library Program}}</ref>
*integrating electric smart-grid technologies<ref>{{cite web|title=Collaborating for Prosperity With American Indians and Alaska Natives|url=https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo129049/508_RD_TribalReport_2019.pdf |website=Federal Depository Library Program}}</ref>


==== Tribal relations ====
==== Tribal relations ====
In 1997, the [[U.S. Forest Service]] (USFS) published a resource guide aimed at helping USFS officials with developing and maintaining relations with different tribal governments. To that end, and in coordination with the Forest Service's 4*point [[American Indian and Alaska Native|American Indian]]/[[Alaska Natives|Alaska Native]] policy, the resource guide discusses how to:
In 1997, the [[U.S. Forest Service]] (USFS) published a resource guide aimed at helping USFS officials with developing and maintaining relations with different tribal governments. To that end, and in coordination with the Forest Service's 4*point American Indian/Alaska Native policy, the resource guide discusses how to:


# Maintain a governmental relationship with Federally Recognized tribal governments.
# Maintain a governmental relationship with Federally Recognized tribal governments.
Line 385: Line 395:


==Meat and poultry hotline==
==Meat and poultry hotline==
The '''USDA Meat and Poultry hotline''' is a toll-free [[user assistance]] [[hotline]] for consumers to answer inquiries about the safe storage, handling, and preparation of meat, poultry, and egg products that can be reached at: 1-888-MPHotline (1-888-674-6854).<ref name="USDAHotline2024"/><ref>{{cite web |title=USDA Meat & Poultry Hotline |url=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/food_safety_education/usda_meat_&_Poultry_hotline/index.asp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040905112629/http://www.fsis.usda.gov/food_safety_education/usda_meat_&_Poultry_hotline/index.asp |url-status=dead |archive-date=2004-09-05 |publisher=USDA |access-date=30 April 2024 |date=5 September 2004}}</ref> The Hotline also responds to other issues related to the mission of USDA's [[Food Safety and Inspection Service]](FSIS), which is to ensure that commercial supply of meat, poultry, and egg products is safe, wholesome, and correctly labeled and packaged.<ref name="USDAHotline2024">{{cite web |title=What is the United States Department of Agriculture' Meat and Poultry Hotline? |url=https://ask.usda.gov/s/article/What-is-the-USDA-Meat-and-Poultry-Hotline |publisher=USA |access-date=30 April 2024 |date=Mar 22, 2024}}{{source-attribution}}</ref> The hotline operates year-round on weekdays excluding federal holidays (except Thanksgiving) from 10am to 6PM PT and is staffed by food safety specialists with backgrounds in home economics, nutrition, and food technology.<ref name="USDAMPH">{{cite web |title=USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline |url=https://www.fsis.usda.gov/food-safety/safe-food-handling-and-preparation/usda-meat-and-poultry-hotline |publisher=USDA |access-date=30 April 2024 |date=Oct 5, 2023}}{{source-attribution}}</ref> The hotline began on July 1, 1985, and has answered over 2 million calls to date in 2024.<ref name="USDAMPH"/> The hotline added Spanish support in 2002, and added two hours in April 2017.<ref name="USDAMPH"/><ref name="Meat2017">{{cite news |title=USDA expands ‘Meat and Poultry Hotline’ hours |url=https://www.meatpoultry.com/articles/16133-usda-expands-meat-and-poultry-hotline-hours |access-date=30 April 2024 |work=Meat+Poultry |date=April 4, 2017 |language=en}}</ref> The hotline can help detect public health threats and has been attributed with increasing American's awareness of foodborne bacteria and how to avoid them.<ref>{{cite web |title=Making the Connection: Activity Report of the USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline for 2000 About the Meat and Poultry Hotline |url=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Frame/FrameRedirect.asp?main=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/pubs/hot2000/index.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041017162850/http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Frame/FrameRedirect.asp?main=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/pubs/hot2000/index.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=2004-10-17 |publisher=USDA FSIS |access-date=30 April 2024 |date=March 2002}}</ref><ref name="FSIS2003">{{cite web |title=USDA Hotline: A Food Safety Resource for Millions |url=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Frame/FrameRedirect.asp?main=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/oa/news/2003/hotline_holiday.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041017163030/http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Frame/FrameRedirect.asp?main=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/oa/news/2003/hotline_holiday.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=2004-10-17 |website=USDA FSIS |access-date=30 April 2024 |location=Washington, DC |date=November 18, 2003}}</ref>
The '''USDA Meat and Poultry hotline''' is a toll-free user assistance hotline for consumers to answer inquiries about the safe storage, handling, and preparation of meat, poultry, and egg products that can be reached at: 1-888-MPHotline (1-888-674-6854).<ref name="USDAHotline2024"/><ref>{{cite web |title=USDA Meat & Poultry Hotline |url=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/food_safety_education/usda_meat_&_Poultry_hotline/index.asp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040905112629/http://www.fsis.usda.gov/food_safety_education/usda_meat_&_Poultry_hotline/index.asp |url-status=dead |archive-date=2004-09-05 |publisher=USDA |access-date=30 April 2024 |date=5 September 2004}}</ref> The Hotline also responds to other issues related to the mission of USDA's [[Food Safety and Inspection Service]](FSIS), which is to ensure that commercial supply of meat, poultry, and egg products is safe, wholesome, and correctly labeled and packaged.<ref name="USDAHotline2024">{{cite web |title=What is the United States Department of Agriculture' Meat and Poultry Hotline? |url=https://ask.usda.gov/s/article/What-is-the-USDA-Meat-and-Poultry-Hotline |publisher=USA |access-date=30 April 2024 |date=Mar 22, 2024}}{{source-attribution}}</ref> The hotline operates year-round on weekdays excluding federal holidays (except Thanksgiving) from 10am to 6PM PT and is staffed by food safety specialists with backgrounds in home economics, nutrition, and food technology.<ref name="USDAMPH">{{cite web |title=USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline |url=https://www.fsis.usda.gov/food-safety/safe-food-handling-and-preparation/usda-meat-and-poultry-hotline |publisher=USDA |access-date=30 April 2024 |date=Oct 5, 2023}}{{source-attribution}}</ref> The hotline began on July 1, 1985, and has answered over 2 million calls to date in 2024.<ref name="USDAMPH"/> The hotline added Spanish support in 2002, and added two hours in April 2017.<ref name="USDAMPH"/><ref name="Meat2017">{{cite news |title=USDA expands ‘Meat and Poultry Hotline’ hours |url=https://www.meatpoultry.com/articles/16133-usda-expands-meat-and-poultry-hotline-hours |access-date=30 April 2024 |work=Meat+Poultry |date=April 4, 2017 |language=en}}</ref> The hotline can help detect public health threats and has been attributed with increasing American's awareness of foodborne bacteria and how to avoid them.<ref>{{cite web |title=Making the Connection: Activity Report of the USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline for 2000 About the Meat and Poultry Hotline |url=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Frame/FrameRedirect.asp?main=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/pubs/hot2000/index.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041017162850/http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Frame/FrameRedirect.asp?main=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/pubs/hot2000/index.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=2004-10-17 |publisher=USDA FSIS |access-date=30 April 2024 |date=March 2002}}</ref><ref name="FSIS2003">{{cite web |title=USDA Hotline: A Food Safety Resource for Millions |url=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Frame/FrameRedirect.asp?main=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/oa/news/2003/hotline_holiday.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041017163030/http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Frame/FrameRedirect.asp?main=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/oa/news/2003/hotline_holiday.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=2004-10-17 |website=USDA FSIS |access-date=30 April 2024 |location=Washington, DC |date=November 18, 2003}}</ref>


The USDA also offers online text support via "Ask Karen."<ref name="Meat2017"/>
The USDA also offers online text support via "Ask Karen."<ref name="Meat2017"/>
Line 393: Line 403:
=== Private sector relationships ===
=== Private sector relationships ===


Part of the USDA's functions includes promoting the economic development of the agricultural sector. In their 2022 strategic plan, they pledged:<blockquote>To maintain a competitive agricultural sector, USDA will support farmers and ranchers’ ability to start and maintain profitable businesses as well as offer financial support to producers affected by natural disasters. Furthermore, USDA’s research agencies will continue to introduce high-performance plants, animals, and integrated management options that increase the efficiency of farming practices. Lastly, USDA will also provide tools to producers so that they are well-positioned to secure a share of a growing market for agricultural products.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/usda-strategic-plan-2018-2022.pdf |title=USDA Strategic Plan FY2018-2022 |date=May 2018 |publisher=United States Department of Agriculture |pages=15 |language=en |chapter=Strategic Goal 2 |access-date=2024-06-07}}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=A secondary, historical source would supplement this citation (or make it unnecessary)|date=July 2024}}</blockquote>The USDA formalized a relationship with the [[Global Food Safety Initiative]] (GFSI) in 2018.  GFSI is a private organization where members of the [[Consumer Goods Forum]] have control over benchmarking requirements in recognition of [[technical standards|private standards]] for food safety. In August 2018, USDA achieved Technical Equivalence against Version 7.1 of the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements for their Harmonized [[Good agricultural practice|GAP]] Plus + certification programme,<ref>{{cite web |title=GFSI Announces USDA AMS GAP Plus + Certification Programme Achieves Technical Equivalence |url=https://mygfsi.com/news_updates/gfsi-announces-usda-ams-gap-plus-certification-programme-achieves-technical-equivalence/ |website=mygfsi.com/ |publisher=GFSI}}</ref> where Technical Equivalence is limited to government-owned food safety certification programmes. This is misaligned with U.S. Government Policy and [[Office of Management and Budget|OMB Circular No. A-119]]<ref>{{cite web |title=OMB Circular A-119: Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities |url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/revised_circular_a-119_as_of_1_22.pdf |website=whitehouse.gov |publisher=The White House}}</ref> which instructs its agencies to adopt [[technical standards|voluntary consensus standards]] before relying upon&nbsp;[[technical standards|industry standards]] (private standards) or developing government standards.
Part of the USDA's functions includes promoting the economic development of the agricultural sector. In their 2022 strategic plan, they pledged:<blockquote>To maintain a competitive agricultural sector, USDA will support farmers and ranchers’ ability to start and maintain profitable businesses as well as offer financial support to producers affected by natural disasters. Furthermore, USDA’s research agencies will continue to introduce high-performance plants, animals, and integrated management options that increase the efficiency of farming practices. Lastly, USDA will also provide tools to producers so that they are well-positioned to secure a share of a growing market for agricultural products.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/usda-strategic-plan-2018-2022.pdf |title=USDA Strategic Plan FY2018-2022 |date=May 2018 |publisher=United States Department of Agriculture |pages=15 |language=en |chapter=Strategic Goal 2 |access-date=2024-06-07}}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=A secondary, historical source would supplement this citation (or make it unnecessary)|date=July 2024}}</blockquote>The USDA formalized a relationship with the [[Global Food Safety Initiative]] (GFSI) in 2018.  GFSI is a private organization where members of the [[Consumer Goods Forum]] have control over benchmarking requirements in recognition of private standards for food safety. In August 2018, USDA achieved Technical Equivalence against Version 7.1 of the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements for their Harmonized [[Good agricultural practice|GAP]] Plus + certification programme,<ref>{{cite web |title=GFSI Announces USDA AMS GAP Plus + Certification Programme Achieves Technical Equivalence |url=https://mygfsi.com/news_updates/gfsi-announces-usda-ams-gap-plus-certification-programme-achieves-technical-equivalence/ |website=mygfsi.com/ |publisher=GFSI}}</ref> where Technical Equivalence is limited to government-owned food safety certification programmes. This is misaligned with U.S. Government Policy and [[Office of Management and Budget|OMB Circular No. A-119]]<ref>{{cite web |title=OMB Circular A-119: Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities |url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/revised_circular_a-119_as_of_1_22.pdf |website=whitehouse.gov |publisher=The White House}}</ref> which instructs its agencies to adopt voluntary consensus standards before relying upon&nbsp;industry standards (private standards) or developing government standards.


Harmonized [[Good agricultural practice|GAP]] Plus+ Standard (V. 3.0) was published in February 2021<ref>{{cite web |title=Harmonized GAP Plus+ Standard |url=https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/Harmonized_GAP_Plus_Standard_Version3.pdf |website=ams.usda.gov |publisher=USDA}}</ref> with reference to GFSI Guidance Document Version 2020, Part III, ignoring reference to [[international standards]] and technical specifications [[ISO 22000]] and ISO T/S 22002-3 Prerequisite Programmes for Farming. The [[USDA]] exception to  [[Office of Management and Budget|OMB Circular No. A-119]] might be attributed to [[lobbying]] and influence of [[Consumer Goods Forum]] members in Washington, D.C.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Doering |first1=Christopher |title=Where the dollars go: Lobbying a big business for large food and beverage CPGs |url=https://www.fooddive.com/news/where-the-dollars-go-lobbying-a-big-business-for-large-food-and-beverage-c/607982/ |website=fooddive.com |publisher=Food Dive}}</ref> In November 2021, GFSI announced its Technical Equivalence was under strategic review explaining the assessment has raised concerns across many stakeholders.<ref>{{cite web |title=GFSI Launches a Strategic Review of its Technical Equivalence Programme |url=https://mygfsi.com/news_updates/gfsi-launches-a-strategic-review-of-its-technical-equivalence-programme/ |website=mygfsi.com |publisher=GFSI}}</ref>
Harmonized [[Good agricultural practice|GAP]] Plus+ Standard (V. 3.0) was published in February 2021<ref>{{cite web |title=Harmonized GAP Plus+ Standard |url=https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/Harmonized_GAP_Plus_Standard_Version3.pdf |website=ams.usda.gov |publisher=USDA}}</ref> with reference to GFSI Guidance Document Version 2020, Part III, ignoring reference to international standards and technical specifications ISO 22000 and ISO T/S 22002-3 Prerequisite Programmes for Farming. The [[USDA]] exception to  [[Office of Management and Budget|OMB Circular No. A-119]] might be attributed to lobbying and influence of [[Consumer Goods Forum]] members in Washington, D.C.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Doering |first1=Christopher |title=Where the dollars go: Lobbying a big business for large food and beverage CPGs |url=https://www.fooddive.com/news/where-the-dollars-go-lobbying-a-big-business-for-large-food-and-beverage-c/607982/ |website=fooddive.com |publisher=Food Dive}}</ref> In November 2021, GFSI announced its Technical Equivalence was under strategic review explaining the assessment has raised concerns across many stakeholders.<ref>{{cite web |title=GFSI Launches a Strategic Review of its Technical Equivalence Programme |url=https://mygfsi.com/news_updates/gfsi-launches-a-strategic-review-of-its-technical-equivalence-programme/ |website=mygfsi.com |publisher=GFSI}}</ref>


==== Dairy ====
==== Dairy ====
{{Further|Dairy Management Inc.}}
The USDA monitors American dairy production and markets, for which it has a Dairy Board and a marketing branch known as [[Dairy Management Inc.|Dairy Management Incorporated]] (DMI).<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Freeman |first=Andrea |date=December 2013 |year= |title=The Unbearable Whiteness of Milk: Food Oppression and the USDA |url=https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=ucilr |journal=UC Irvine Law Review |volume=3 |issue=4 |pages=1251–1279 |via=[[University of California, Irvine]]}}</ref> Furthermore, the USDA collaborates with [[United Dairy Industry Association]] (UDIA), the [[National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board]] for market information on the industry.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/2005%20-%20Dairy%20Report%20to%20Congress.pdf |title=Report to Congress on the National Dairy Promotion and Research Program and the National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Program |date=2006-07-01 |publisher=United States Department of Agriculture |pages=6 |language=en}}</ref>
The USDA monitors American dairy production and markets, for which it has a Dairy Board and a marketing branch known as [[Dairy Management Inc.|Dairy Management Incorporated]] (DMI).<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Freeman |first=Andrea |date=December 2013 |year= |title=The Unbearable Whiteness of Milk: Food Oppression and the USDA |url=https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=ucilr |journal=UC Irvine Law Review |volume=3 |issue=4 |pages=1251–1279 |via=[[University of California, Irvine]]}}</ref> Furthermore, the USDA collaborates with United Dairy Industry Association (UDIA), the National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board for market information on the industry.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/2005%20-%20Dairy%20Report%20to%20Congress.pdf |title=Report to Congress on the National Dairy Promotion and Research Program and the National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Program |date=2006-07-01 |publisher=United States Department of Agriculture |pages=6 |language=en}}</ref>


=== COVID-19 relief ===
=== COVID-19 relief ===
During the [[COVID-19 pandemic in the United States|COVID-19 pandemic]], Congress allocated funding to the USDA to address the disturbances rippling through the agricultural sector. On April 17, 2020, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture [[Sonny Perdue]] announced the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program:<ref>{{cite news|date=April 17, 2020|title=USDA Announces Coronavirus Food Assistance Program|publisher=United States Department of Agriculture|url=https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2020/04/17/usda-announces-coronavirus-food-assistance-program|access-date=November 23, 2021}}</ref>
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress allocated funding to the USDA to address the disturbances rippling through the agricultural sector. On April 17, 2020, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program:<ref>{{cite news|date=April 17, 2020|title=USDA Announces Coronavirus Food Assistance Program|publisher=United States Department of Agriculture|url=https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2020/04/17/usda-announces-coronavirus-food-assistance-program|access-date=November 23, 2021}}</ref>


{{blockquote|The American food supply chain had to adapt, and it remains safe, secure, and strong, and we all know that starts with America's farmers and ranchers. This program will not only provide immediate relief for our farmers and ranchers, but it will also allow for the purchase and distribution of our agricultural abundance to help our fellow Americans in need.}}
{{blockquote|The American food supply chain had to adapt, and it remains safe, secure, and strong, and we all know that starts with America's farmers and ranchers. This program will not only provide immediate relief for our farmers and ranchers, but it will also allow for the purchase and distribution of our agricultural abundance to help our fellow Americans in need.}}
Line 497: Line 506:
*[[Farm Credit Administration]]
*[[Farm Credit Administration]]
* [[Institute of Child Nutrition]]
* [[Institute of Child Nutrition]]
* [[United States farm bill]], history of Congressional laws on agriculture
* United States farm bill, history of Congressional laws on agriculture
* [[United States Agricultural Society]]
* [[United States Agricultural Society]]
* [[USDA home loan]]
* [[USDA home loan]]
Line 560: Line 569:
[[Category:United States federal executive departments|Agriculture]]
[[Category:United States federal executive departments|Agriculture]]
[[Category:Agricultural organizations based in the United States]]
[[Category:Agricultural organizations based in the United States]]
[[Category:Department of Agriculture]]