First presidency of Donald Trump: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "The Guardian" to "The Guardian"
m (Text replacement - "Associated Press" to "Associated Press")
m (Text replacement - "The Guardian" to "The Guardian")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 54: Line 54:
The [[First presidential transition of Donald Trump|presidential transition period]] began following Trump's victory in the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 U.S. presidential election]], though Trump had chosen [[Bill Hagerty]] to begin planning for the transition in August 2016. During the transition period, Trump announced nominations for his [[First cabinet of Donald Trump|cabinet]] and [[Executive Office of the President of the United States|administration]].
The [[First presidential transition of Donald Trump|presidential transition period]] began following Trump's victory in the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 U.S. presidential election]], though Trump had chosen [[Bill Hagerty]] to begin planning for the transition in August 2016. During the transition period, Trump announced nominations for his [[First cabinet of Donald Trump|cabinet]] and [[Executive Office of the President of the United States|administration]].


Trump was [[First inauguration of Donald Trump|inaugurated]] on January 20, 2017, succeeding [[Presidency of Barack Obama|Barack Obama]]. He was sworn in by [[Chief Justice of the United States|Chief Justice]] [[John Roberts]].<ref name="inaugurated1">[[David Fahrenthold|Fahrenthold, David]]; Rucker, Philip; Wagner, John (January 20, 2017). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-to-be-sworn-in-marking-a-transformative-shift-in-the-countrys-leadership/2017/01/20/954b9cac-de7d-11e6-ad42-f3375f271c9c_story.html "Donald Trump is sworn in as president, vows to end 'American carnage'"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200331205748/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-to-be-sworn-in-marking-a-transformative-shift-in-the-countrys-leadership/2017/01/20/954b9cac-de7d-11e6-ad42-f3375f271c9c_story.html |date=March 31, 2020 }}. ''[[The Washington Post]]''. Retrieved January 20, 2017.</ref> In his seventeen-minute inaugural address, Trump painted a dark picture of contemporary America, pledging to end "American carnage" caused by urban crime and saying America's "wealth, strength, and confidence has dissipated" by jobs lost overseas.<ref>Pilkington, Ed (January 21, 2018). [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/20/donald-trump-transition-of-power-president-first-speech "'American carnage': Donald Trump's vision casts shadow over day of pageantry"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200713104006/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/20/donald-trump-transition-of-power-president-first-speech |date=July 13, 2020 }}. ''[[The Guardian]]''. Retrieved February 21, 2018.</ref> He declared his strategy would be "[[America First (policy)|America First]]."<ref name="inaugurated1" /> The largest single-day protest in U.S. history, the [[2017 Women's March|Women's March]], took place the day after his inauguration and was driven by opposition to Trump and his policies and views.<ref>Waddell, Kaveh (January 23, 2017). [https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/01/womens-march-protest-count/514166/ "The Exhausting Work of Tallying America's Largest Protest"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170126005341/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/01/womens-march-protest-count/514166/ |date=January 26, 2017 }}. ''[[The Atlantic]]''. Retrieved February 8, 2017.</ref>
Trump was [[First inauguration of Donald Trump|inaugurated]] on January 20, 2017, succeeding [[Presidency of Barack Obama|Barack Obama]]. He was sworn in by [[Chief Justice of the United States|Chief Justice]] [[John Roberts]].<ref name="inaugurated1">[[David Fahrenthold|Fahrenthold, David]]; Rucker, Philip; Wagner, John (January 20, 2017). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-to-be-sworn-in-marking-a-transformative-shift-in-the-countrys-leadership/2017/01/20/954b9cac-de7d-11e6-ad42-f3375f271c9c_story.html "Donald Trump is sworn in as president, vows to end 'American carnage'"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200331205748/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-to-be-sworn-in-marking-a-transformative-shift-in-the-countrys-leadership/2017/01/20/954b9cac-de7d-11e6-ad42-f3375f271c9c_story.html |date=March 31, 2020 }}. ''[[The Washington Post]]''. Retrieved January 20, 2017.</ref> In his seventeen-minute inaugural address, Trump painted a dark picture of contemporary America, pledging to end "American carnage" caused by urban crime and saying America's "wealth, strength, and confidence has dissipated" by jobs lost overseas.<ref>Pilkington, Ed (January 21, 2018). [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/20/donald-trump-transition-of-power-president-first-speech "'American carnage': Donald Trump's vision casts shadow over day of pageantry"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200713104006/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/20/donald-trump-transition-of-power-president-first-speech |date=July 13, 2020 }}. ''The Guardian''. Retrieved February 21, 2018.</ref> He declared his strategy would be "[[America First (policy)|America First]]."<ref name="inaugurated1" /> The largest single-day protest in U.S. history, the [[2017 Women's March|Women's March]], took place the day after his inauguration and was driven by opposition to Trump and his policies and views.<ref>Waddell, Kaveh (January 23, 2017). [https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/01/womens-march-protest-count/514166/ "The Exhausting Work of Tallying America's Largest Protest"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170126005341/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/01/womens-march-protest-count/514166/ |date=January 26, 2017 }}. ''[[The Atlantic]]''. Retrieved February 8, 2017.</ref>


== Administration ==
== Administration ==
Line 70: Line 70:
Days after the presidential election, Trump selected RNC Chairman [[Reince Priebus]] as his [[White House Chief of Staff|chief of staff]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Shear|first1=Michael|last2=Haberman|first2=Maggie|author2-link=Maggie Haberman|last3=Rappeport|first3=Alan|title=Donald Trump Picks Reince Priebus as Chief of Staff and Stephen Bannon as Strategist|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/14/us/politics/reince-priebus-chief-of-staff-donald-trump.html|newspaper=The New York Times|date=November 13, 2016|access-date=November 14, 2016}}</ref> Trump chose Sessions for the position of attorney general.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Stokols|first=Eli|title=What Trump's early picks say about his administration|url=https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/trump-cabinet-selections-231617 |newspaper=[[Politico]]|date=November 18, 2016|access-date=November 18, 2016}}</ref>
Days after the presidential election, Trump selected RNC Chairman [[Reince Priebus]] as his [[White House Chief of Staff|chief of staff]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Shear|first1=Michael|last2=Haberman|first2=Maggie|author2-link=Maggie Haberman|last3=Rappeport|first3=Alan|title=Donald Trump Picks Reince Priebus as Chief of Staff and Stephen Bannon as Strategist|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/14/us/politics/reince-priebus-chief-of-staff-donald-trump.html|newspaper=The New York Times|date=November 13, 2016|access-date=November 14, 2016}}</ref> Trump chose Sessions for the position of attorney general.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Stokols|first=Eli|title=What Trump's early picks say about his administration|url=https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/trump-cabinet-selections-231617 |newspaper=[[Politico]]|date=November 18, 2016|access-date=November 18, 2016}}</ref>


In February 2017, Trump formally announced his cabinet structure, elevating the [[Director of National Intelligence]] and [[Director of the Central Intelligence Agency]] to cabinet level. The [[Council of Economic Advisers#Chairmen and members|Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers]], which had been added to the cabinet by Obama in 2009, was removed from the cabinet. Trump's cabinet consisted of 24 members, more than Obama at 23 or [[George W. Bush]] at 21.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/president-trump-announces-his-full-cabinet-roster-044552214.html |first=Hunter |last=Walker |work=[[Yahoo! News]] |date=February 8, 2017 |title=President Trump announces his full Cabinet roster|access-date=February 9, 2017}}</ref>
In February 2017, Trump formally announced his cabinet structure, elevating the [[Director of National Intelligence]] and [[Director of the Central Intelligence Agency]] to cabinet level. The [[Council of Economic Advisers#Chairmen and members|Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers]], which had been added to the cabinet by Obama in 2009, was removed from the cabinet. Trump's cabinet consisted of 24 members, more than Obama at 23 or George W. Bush at 21.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/president-trump-announces-his-full-cabinet-roster-044552214.html |first=Hunter |last=Walker |work=[[Yahoo! News]] |date=February 8, 2017 |title=President Trump announces his full Cabinet roster|access-date=February 9, 2017}}</ref>


On February 13, 2017, Trump fired [[Michael Flynn]] from the post of [[National Security Advisor (United States)|National Security Advisor]] on grounds that he had lied to Vice President Pence about his communications with [[List of ambassadors of Russia to the United States|Russian Ambassador]] [[Sergey Kislyak]]; Flynn later pleaded guilty to lying to the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] (FBI) about his contacts with Russia.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Goldman|first1=Adam|last2=Mazzetti|first2=Mark|date=May 14, 2020|title=Trump White House Changes Its Story on Michael Flynn|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/14/us/politics/trump-michael-flynn.html|access-date=May 20, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Flynn was fired amidst the ongoing controversy concerning [[Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections|Russian interference in the 2016 election]] and accusations that Trump's electoral team colluded with Russian agents.
On February 13, 2017, Trump fired [[Michael Flynn]] from the post of [[National Security Advisor (United States)|National Security Advisor]] on grounds that he had lied to Vice President Pence about his communications with [[List of ambassadors of Russia to the United States|Russian Ambassador]] [[Sergey Kislyak]]; Flynn later pleaded guilty to lying to the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] (FBI) about his contacts with Russia.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Goldman|first1=Adam|last2=Mazzetti|first2=Mark|date=May 14, 2020|title=Trump White House Changes Its Story on Michael Flynn|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/14/us/politics/trump-michael-flynn.html|access-date=May 20, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Flynn was fired amidst the ongoing controversy concerning [[Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections|Russian interference in the 2016 election]] and accusations that Trump's electoral team colluded with Russian agents.
Line 120: Line 120:
During the first two years of his presidency, Trump repeatedly sought to influence the [[United States Department of Justice|Department of Justice]] to investigate Clinton,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/promise/1345/appoint-special-prosecutor-investigate-hillary-cli/ |access-date=November 10, 2021 |title=No special counsel was ever appointed to investigate Hillary Clinton |work=PolitiFact |first=Louis |last=Jacobson |date=July 15, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||access-date=November 10, 2021 |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/03/trump-doj-investigate-hillary-clinton-244505 |title=Trump ratchets up call for DOJ to investigate Hillary Clinton |first=Louis |last=Nelson |website=[[Politico]] |date=November 3, 2017}}</ref> the [[Democratic National Committee]],<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/358576-trump-calls-on-fbi-to-investigate-dems-after-revelations-about/|first1=Jordan|last1=Fabian|first2=Avery|last2=Anapol|title=Trump calls on FBI to investigate Clinton-DNC deal|work=The Hill|date=November 3, 2017|access-date=September 18, 2022}}</ref> and Comey.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-foes-james-comey-andrew-mccabe-reportedly-subjected-rare-rigorou-rcna37024|title=IRS asks for review of audits into Trump foes James Comey and Andrew McCabe|date=July 7, 2022|first1=Zoë|last1=Richards|first2=Dareh|last2=Gregorian|work=NBC News|access-date=September 19, 2022}}</ref> He persistently repeated a variety of allegations, at least some of which had already been investigated or debunked.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/03/trump-doj-investigate-hillary-clinton-244505 |first=Louis |last=Nelson |title=Trump ratchets up call for DOJ to investigate Hillary Clinton |work=[[Politico]] |access-date=November 21, 2018 |date=November 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/20/politics/donald-trump-justice-department-campaign/index.html|title=Trump demands Justice Department examine whether it or FBI spied on campaign |first1=Maegan |last1=Vazquez |first2=Laura |last2=Jarrett |first3=Dana |last3=Bash |date=May 20, 2018 |work=CNN|access-date=November 21, 2018}}</ref> In spring 2018, Trump told White House counsel [[Don McGahn]] he wanted to order the Department of Justice to prosecute Clinton and Comey, but McGahn advised Trump such action would constitute abuse of power and invite possible [[Federal impeachment in the United States|impeachment]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/20/us/politics/president-trump-justice-department.html |date=November 20, 2018 |first1=Michael S. |last1=Schmidt |first2=Maggie |last2=Haberman |title=Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton |newspaper=The New York Times |access-date=November 21, 2018}}</ref> In May 2018, Trump demanded that the Department of Justice investigate "whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes," which the Department of Justice referred to its [[United States Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General|inspector general]].<ref name="nytimes.com2">{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/20/us/politics/trump-mueller.html |date=May 20, 2018 |first1=Julie Hirschfeld |last1=Davis |first2=Adam |last2=Goldman |title=Trump Demands Inquiry Into Whether Justice Dept. 'Infiltrated or Surveilled' His Campaign|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=November 21, 2018}}</ref> Although it is not unlawful for a president to exert influence on the Department of Justice to open an investigation, presidents have assiduously avoided doing so to prevent perceptions of political interference.<ref name="nytimes.com2" /><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-politics-north-america-ap-top-news-impeachments-060ca2399a744b4a9554dbd2ec276a90 |title=Trump Wanted to Prosecute Comey, Hillary Clinton|work=Associated Press |date=November 21, 2018 |first=Zeke |last=Miller |access-date=November 21, 2018}}</ref>
During the first two years of his presidency, Trump repeatedly sought to influence the [[United States Department of Justice|Department of Justice]] to investigate Clinton,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/promise/1345/appoint-special-prosecutor-investigate-hillary-cli/ |access-date=November 10, 2021 |title=No special counsel was ever appointed to investigate Hillary Clinton |work=PolitiFact |first=Louis |last=Jacobson |date=July 15, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||access-date=November 10, 2021 |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/03/trump-doj-investigate-hillary-clinton-244505 |title=Trump ratchets up call for DOJ to investigate Hillary Clinton |first=Louis |last=Nelson |website=[[Politico]] |date=November 3, 2017}}</ref> the [[Democratic National Committee]],<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/358576-trump-calls-on-fbi-to-investigate-dems-after-revelations-about/|first1=Jordan|last1=Fabian|first2=Avery|last2=Anapol|title=Trump calls on FBI to investigate Clinton-DNC deal|work=The Hill|date=November 3, 2017|access-date=September 18, 2022}}</ref> and Comey.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-foes-james-comey-andrew-mccabe-reportedly-subjected-rare-rigorou-rcna37024|title=IRS asks for review of audits into Trump foes James Comey and Andrew McCabe|date=July 7, 2022|first1=Zoë|last1=Richards|first2=Dareh|last2=Gregorian|work=NBC News|access-date=September 19, 2022}}</ref> He persistently repeated a variety of allegations, at least some of which had already been investigated or debunked.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/03/trump-doj-investigate-hillary-clinton-244505 |first=Louis |last=Nelson |title=Trump ratchets up call for DOJ to investigate Hillary Clinton |work=[[Politico]] |access-date=November 21, 2018 |date=November 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/20/politics/donald-trump-justice-department-campaign/index.html|title=Trump demands Justice Department examine whether it or FBI spied on campaign |first1=Maegan |last1=Vazquez |first2=Laura |last2=Jarrett |first3=Dana |last3=Bash |date=May 20, 2018 |work=CNN|access-date=November 21, 2018}}</ref> In spring 2018, Trump told White House counsel [[Don McGahn]] he wanted to order the Department of Justice to prosecute Clinton and Comey, but McGahn advised Trump such action would constitute abuse of power and invite possible [[Federal impeachment in the United States|impeachment]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/20/us/politics/president-trump-justice-department.html |date=November 20, 2018 |first1=Michael S. |last1=Schmidt |first2=Maggie |last2=Haberman |title=Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton |newspaper=The New York Times |access-date=November 21, 2018}}</ref> In May 2018, Trump demanded that the Department of Justice investigate "whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes," which the Department of Justice referred to its [[United States Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General|inspector general]].<ref name="nytimes.com2">{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/20/us/politics/trump-mueller.html |date=May 20, 2018 |first1=Julie Hirschfeld |last1=Davis |first2=Adam |last2=Goldman |title=Trump Demands Inquiry Into Whether Justice Dept. 'Infiltrated or Surveilled' His Campaign|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=November 21, 2018}}</ref> Although it is not unlawful for a president to exert influence on the Department of Justice to open an investigation, presidents have assiduously avoided doing so to prevent perceptions of political interference.<ref name="nytimes.com2" /><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-politics-north-america-ap-top-news-impeachments-060ca2399a744b4a9554dbd2ec276a90 |title=Trump Wanted to Prosecute Comey, Hillary Clinton|work=Associated Press |date=November 21, 2018 |first=Zeke |last=Miller |access-date=November 21, 2018}}</ref>


Sessions resisted several demands by Trump and his allies for investigations of political opponents, causing Trump to repeatedly express frustration, saying at one point, "I don't have an attorney general."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.npr.org/2018/09/19/649475687/trump-again-slams-jeff-sessions-i-don-t-have-an-attorney-general|title=Trump Again Slams Jeff Sessions: 'I Don't Have An Attorney General'|newspaper=[[NPR]]|date=September 19, 2018|access-date=November 21, 2018|last1=Seipel|first1=Arnie}}</ref> While criticizing the special counsel investigation in July 2019, Trump falsely claimed that [[Article Two of the United States Constitution|the Constitution]] ensures that "I have to the right to do whatever I want as president."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Brice-Saddler|first=Michael|date=July 23, 2019|title=While bemoaning Mueller probe, Trump falsely says the Constitution gives him 'the right to do whatever I want'|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/23/trump-falsely-tells-auditorium-full-teens-constitution-gives-him-right-do-whatever-i-want/|access-date=July 24, 2019|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> Trump had on multiple occasions either suggested or promoted views of extending his presidency beyond normal term limits.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Corbett|first=Erin|title=Trump Keeps Alluding to Extending His Presidency. Does He Mean It? |date=May 6, 2019 |url=https://fortune.com/2019/05/06/donald-trump-presidential-term-limit/|access-date=June 17, 2019|website=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Wu|first=Nicholas|title=Trump says supporters could 'demand' he not leave office after two terms|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/16/trump-says-supporters-could-demand-he-not-leave-after-two-terms/1471915001/ |date=June 16, 2019 |access-date=June 17, 2019|website=[[USA Today]]}}</ref>
Sessions resisted several demands by Trump and his allies for investigations of political opponents, causing Trump to repeatedly express frustration, saying at one point, "I don't have an attorney general."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.npr.org/2018/09/19/649475687/trump-again-slams-jeff-sessions-i-don-t-have-an-attorney-general|title=Trump Again Slams Jeff Sessions: 'I Don't Have An Attorney General'|newspaper=[[NPR]]|date=September 19, 2018|access-date=November 21, 2018|last1=Seipel|first1=Arnie}}</ref> While criticizing the special counsel investigation in July 2019, Trump falsely claimed that [[Article Two of the United States Constitution|the Constitution]] ensures that "I have to the right to do whatever I want as president."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Brice-Saddler|first=Michael|date=July 23, 2019|title=While bemoaning Mueller probe, Trump falsely says the Constitution gives him 'the right to do whatever I want'|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/23/trump-falsely-tells-auditorium-full-teens-constitution-gives-him-right-do-whatever-i-want/|access-date=July 24, 2019|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> Trump had on multiple occasions either suggested or promoted views of extending his presidency beyond normal term limits.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Corbett|first=Erin|title=Trump Keeps Alluding to Extending His Presidency. Does He Mean It? |date=May 6, 2019 |url=https://fortune.com/2019/05/06/donald-trump-presidential-term-limit/|access-date=June 17, 2019|website=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Wu|first=Nicholas|title=Trump says supporters could 'demand' he not leave office after two terms|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/16/trump-says-supporters-could-demand-he-not-leave-after-two-terms/1471915001/ |date=June 16, 2019 |access-date=June 17, 2019|website=USA Today}}</ref>


Trump frequently criticized the independence of the judiciary for unfairly interfering in his administration's ability to decide policy.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Coyle|first=Marcia|date=February 25, 2020|title='Ridiculous and Unhelpful': Commentary on Trump's Bashing of SCOTUS|work=[[National Law Journal]]|url=https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2020/02/25/ridiculous-and-unhelpful-commentary-on-trumps-bashing-of-scotus/?slreturn=20200125193933|access-date=February 26, 2020}}</ref> In November 2018, in an extraordinary rebuke of a sitting president, Roberts criticized Trump's characterization of a judge who had ruled against his policies as an "Obama judge", adding "That's not law."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/20/us/politics/trump-appeals-court-ninth-circuit.html |first=Adam |last=Liptak |date=November 20, 2018 |title=Trump Takes Aim at Appeals Court, Calling It a 'Disgrace'|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=November 21, 2018}}</ref> In October 2020, twenty Republican former [[United States Attorney|U.S. attorneys]], among them appointees by each Republican president since Eisenhower, characterized Trump as "a threat to the rule of law in our country." [[Greg Brower]], who worked in the Trump administration, asserted, "It's clear that President Trump views the Justice Department and the FBI as his own personal law firm and investigative agency."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Hamburger |first1=Tom |last2=Barrett |first2=Devlin |title=Former U.S. attorneys – all Republicans – back Biden, saying Trump threatens 'the rule of law' |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republican-us-attorneys-back-biden/2020/10/27/c1b55702-17fd-11eb-befb-8864259bd2d8_story.html |access-date=November 10, 2021 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=October 27, 2020}}</ref>
Trump frequently criticized the independence of the judiciary for unfairly interfering in his administration's ability to decide policy.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Coyle|first=Marcia|date=February 25, 2020|title='Ridiculous and Unhelpful': Commentary on Trump's Bashing of SCOTUS|work=[[National Law Journal]]|url=https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2020/02/25/ridiculous-and-unhelpful-commentary-on-trumps-bashing-of-scotus/?slreturn=20200125193933|access-date=February 26, 2020}}</ref> In November 2018, in an extraordinary rebuke of a sitting president, Roberts criticized Trump's characterization of a judge who had ruled against his policies as an "Obama judge", adding "That's not law."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/20/us/politics/trump-appeals-court-ninth-circuit.html |first=Adam |last=Liptak |date=November 20, 2018 |title=Trump Takes Aim at Appeals Court, Calling It a 'Disgrace'|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=November 21, 2018}}</ref> In October 2020, twenty Republican former [[United States Attorney|U.S. attorneys]], among them appointees by each Republican president since Eisenhower, characterized Trump as "a threat to the rule of law in our country." [[Greg Brower]], who worked in the Trump administration, asserted, "It's clear that President Trump views the Justice Department and the FBI as his own personal law firm and investigative agency."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Hamburger |first1=Tom |last2=Barrett |first2=Devlin |title=Former U.S. attorneys – all Republicans – back Biden, saying Trump threatens 'the rule of law' |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republican-us-attorneys-back-biden/2020/10/27/c1b55702-17fd-11eb-befb-8864259bd2d8_story.html |access-date=November 10, 2021 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=October 27, 2020}}</ref>
Line 137: Line 137:
[[File:19 03 2019 Declaração à imprensa (47423243351).jpg|thumb|During a joint news conference, Trump said he was "very proud" to hear [[Brazil]]ian president [[Jair Bolsonaro]] use the term "fake news."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump says he's 'very proud' to hear Bolsonaro use the term 'fake news'|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/434762-trump-says-hes-very-proud-to-hear-bolsonaro-use-the-term-fake-news |first=Brett |last=Samuels |access-date=November 7, 2021 |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|date=March 19, 2019}}</ref>]]
[[File:19 03 2019 Declaração à imprensa (47423243351).jpg|thumb|During a joint news conference, Trump said he was "very proud" to hear [[Brazil]]ian president [[Jair Bolsonaro]] use the term "fake news."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump says he's 'very proud' to hear Bolsonaro use the term 'fake news'|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/434762-trump-says-hes-very-proud-to-hear-bolsonaro-use-the-term-fake-news |first=Brett |last=Samuels |access-date=November 7, 2021 |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|date=March 19, 2019}}</ref>]]


In October 2018, Trump praised U.S. representative [[Greg Gianforte]] for assaulting political reporter [[Ben Jacobs (journalist)|Ben Jacobs]] in 2017.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/19/us/politics/trump-greg-gianforte-montana.html|title='That's My Kind of Guy,' Trump Says of Republican Lawmaker Who Body-Slammed a Reporter|last=Cochrane|first=Emily|date=October 19, 2018|work=The New York Times|access-date=October 20, 2018}}</ref> According to analysts, the incident marked the first time the president has "openly and directly praised a violent act against a journalist on American soil."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/oct/18/trump-greg-gianforte-assault-guardian-ben-jacobs|title=Trump praises Gianforte for assault on Guardian reporter: 'He's my guy'|last=Pilkington|first=Ed|date=October 19, 2018|website=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=October 19, 2018}}</ref> Later that month, as [[October 2018 United States mail bombing attempts|CNN and prominent Democrats were targeted with mail bombs]], Trump initially condemned the bomb attempts but shortly thereafter blamed the "Mainstream Media that I refer to as Fake News" for causing "a very big part of the anger we see today in our society."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://edition.cnn.com/2018/10/25/politics/trump-blames-media-for-anger-after-attacks/index.html |date=October 25, 2018 |title=Trump claims media to blame for 'anger' after bombs sent to CNN, Dems |first1=Veronica |last1=Stracqualursi |first2=Liz |last2=Stark |work=CNN |access-date=October 25, 2018}}</ref>
In October 2018, Trump praised U.S. representative [[Greg Gianforte]] for assaulting political reporter [[Ben Jacobs (journalist)|Ben Jacobs]] in 2017.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/19/us/politics/trump-greg-gianforte-montana.html|title='That's My Kind of Guy,' Trump Says of Republican Lawmaker Who Body-Slammed a Reporter|last=Cochrane|first=Emily|date=October 19, 2018|work=The New York Times|access-date=October 20, 2018}}</ref> According to analysts, the incident marked the first time the president has "openly and directly praised a violent act against a journalist on American soil."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/oct/18/trump-greg-gianforte-assault-guardian-ben-jacobs|title=Trump praises Gianforte for assault on Guardian reporter: 'He's my guy'|last=Pilkington|first=Ed|date=October 19, 2018|website=The Guardian|access-date=October 19, 2018}}</ref> Later that month, as [[October 2018 United States mail bombing attempts|CNN and prominent Democrats were targeted with mail bombs]], Trump initially condemned the bomb attempts but shortly thereafter blamed the "Mainstream Media that I refer to as Fake News" for causing "a very big part of the anger we see today in our society."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://edition.cnn.com/2018/10/25/politics/trump-blames-media-for-anger-after-attacks/index.html |date=October 25, 2018 |title=Trump claims media to blame for 'anger' after bombs sent to CNN, Dems |first1=Veronica |last1=Stracqualursi |first2=Liz |last2=Stark |work=CNN |access-date=October 25, 2018}}</ref>


The Trump Justice Department obtained by court order the 2017 [[phone log]]s or email [[metadata]] of reporters from CNN, ''The New York Times'', ''The Washington Post'', [[BuzzFeed]], and ''Politico'' as part of investigations into leaks of classified information.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/02/politics/trump-administration-phone-records-reporters-new-york-times/index.html |access-date=November 11, 2021 |date=June 3, 2021 |title=New York Times reports Trump administration secretly obtained its reporters' phone records|first=Paul |last=LeBlanc |website=CNN}}</ref>
The Trump Justice Department obtained by court order the 2017 [[phone log]]s or email [[metadata]] of reporters from CNN, ''The New York Times'', ''The Washington Post'', [[BuzzFeed]], and ''Politico'' as part of investigations into leaks of classified information.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/02/politics/trump-administration-phone-records-reporters-new-york-times/index.html |access-date=November 11, 2021 |date=June 3, 2021 |title=New York Times reports Trump administration secretly obtained its reporters' phone records|first=Paul |last=LeBlanc |website=CNN}}</ref>
Line 156: Line 156:
In response to the mid-2020 [[George Floyd protests]], some of which resulted in looting,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Calamur|first1=Krishnadev|last2=Rascoe|first2=Ayesha|last3=Wise|first3=Alana|date=May 29, 2020|title=Trump Says He Spoke With Floyd's Family, Understands Hurt And Pain Of Community|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/05/29/864722348/twitter-hides-trumps-tweet-on-minneapolis-saying-it-glorifies-violence|access-date=January 9, 2021|website=[[NPR]]}}</ref> Trump tweeted on May 25 that "when the looting starts, the shooting starts." Not long after, Twitter restricted the tweet for violating the company's policy on promoting violence.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Porter|first=Jon|date=May 29, 2020|title=Twitter restricts new Trump tweet for 'glorifying violence'|url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/29/21274323/trump-twitter-glorifying-violence-minneapolis-shooting-looting-notice-restriction|access-date=June 29, 2020|website=The Verge}}</ref> On May 28, Trump signed an executive order which sought to limit legal protections of social media companies.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Allyn|first=Bobby|date=May 28, 2020|title=Stung By Twitter, Trump Signs Executive Order To Weaken Social Media Companies|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/05/28/863932758/stung-by-twitter-trump-signs-executive-order-to-weaken-social-media-companies|access-date=June 29, 2020|website=[[NPR]]}}</ref>
In response to the mid-2020 [[George Floyd protests]], some of which resulted in looting,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Calamur|first1=Krishnadev|last2=Rascoe|first2=Ayesha|last3=Wise|first3=Alana|date=May 29, 2020|title=Trump Says He Spoke With Floyd's Family, Understands Hurt And Pain Of Community|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/05/29/864722348/twitter-hides-trumps-tweet-on-minneapolis-saying-it-glorifies-violence|access-date=January 9, 2021|website=[[NPR]]}}</ref> Trump tweeted on May 25 that "when the looting starts, the shooting starts." Not long after, Twitter restricted the tweet for violating the company's policy on promoting violence.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Porter|first=Jon|date=May 29, 2020|title=Twitter restricts new Trump tweet for 'glorifying violence'|url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/29/21274323/trump-twitter-glorifying-violence-minneapolis-shooting-looting-notice-restriction|access-date=June 29, 2020|website=The Verge}}</ref> On May 28, Trump signed an executive order which sought to limit legal protections of social media companies.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Allyn|first=Bobby|date=May 28, 2020|title=Stung By Twitter, Trump Signs Executive Order To Weaken Social Media Companies|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/05/28/863932758/stung-by-twitter-trump-signs-executive-order-to-weaken-social-media-companies|access-date=June 29, 2020|website=[[NPR]]}}</ref>


On January 8, 2021, Twitter announced that they had permanently suspended Trump's personal account "due to the risk of further [[incitement]] of violence" following the [[January 6 United States Capitol attack|Capitol attack]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=January 8, 2020|title=Permanent suspension of @realDonaldTrump|url=https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspension.html|access-date=January 9, 2021|website=Twitter}}</ref> Trump announced in his final tweet before the suspension that he would not attend the [[inauguration of Joe Biden]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/08/tech/trump-twitter-ban/index.html|title=Twitter bans President Trump permanently|first=Brian|last=Fung|work=CNN|date=January 8, 2021|access-date=January 9, 2021}}</ref> Other social media platforms like [[Facebook]], [[Snapchat]], [[YouTube]] and others also suspended the official handles of Donald Trump.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/13/youtube-suspends-trump-channel-from-uploading-new-content-for-seven-days|title=YouTube suspends Trump channel from uploading new content for seven days|access-date=January 13, 2021|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=January 13, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.vox.com/2021/1/10/22223356/every-platform-that-banned-trump-twitter-facebook-snapchat-twitch |first=Cameron |last=Peters |date=January 10, 2021 |title=Every online platform that has cracked down on Trump|access-date=January 10, 2021 |website=[[Vox (website)|Vox]]}}</ref>
On January 8, 2021, Twitter announced that they had permanently suspended Trump's personal account "due to the risk of further [[incitement]] of violence" following the [[January 6 United States Capitol attack|Capitol attack]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=January 8, 2020|title=Permanent suspension of @realDonaldTrump|url=https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspension.html|access-date=January 9, 2021|website=Twitter}}</ref> Trump announced in his final tweet before the suspension that he would not attend the [[inauguration of Joe Biden]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/08/tech/trump-twitter-ban/index.html|title=Twitter bans President Trump permanently|first=Brian|last=Fung|work=CNN|date=January 8, 2021|access-date=January 9, 2021}}</ref> Other social media platforms like [[Facebook]], [[Snapchat]], [[YouTube]] and others also suspended the official handles of Donald Trump.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/13/youtube-suspends-trump-channel-from-uploading-new-content-for-seven-days|title=YouTube suspends Trump channel from uploading new content for seven days|access-date=January 13, 2021|website=The Guardian|date=January 13, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.vox.com/2021/1/10/22223356/every-platform-that-banned-trump-twitter-facebook-snapchat-twitch |first=Cameron |last=Peters |date=January 10, 2021 |title=Every online platform that has cracked down on Trump|access-date=January 10, 2021 |website=[[Vox (website)|Vox]]}}</ref>


== Domestic affairs ==
== Domestic affairs ==
Line 172: Line 172:
[[File:Ann Wagner Statement on President Signing FOSTA into Law.jpg|thumb|Trump signed [[FOSTA-SESTA]] on April 16, 2018.{{Verify source|date=June 2024|reason=date, secondary source}}]]
[[File:Ann Wagner Statement on President Signing FOSTA into Law.jpg|thumb|Trump signed [[FOSTA-SESTA]] on April 16, 2018.{{Verify source|date=June 2024|reason=date, secondary source}}]]


The ''New York Times'' summarized the Trump administration's "general approach to law enforcement" as "cracking down on violent crime", "not regulating the police departments that fight it", and overhauling "programs that the Obama administration used to ease tensions between communities and the police".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Eder|first1=Steve|last2=Protess|first2=Ben|last3=Dewan|first3=Shaila|date=November 21, 2017|title=How Trump's Hands-Off Approach to Policing Is Frustrating Some Chiefs|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/21/us/trump-justice-department-police.html|access-date=November 22, 2017|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Trump reversed a ban on providing federal military equipment to [[Local law enforcement in the United States|local police departments]]<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Johnson|first=Kevin|title=Trump lifts ban on military gear to local police forces|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/08/27/trump-expected-lift-ban-military-gear-local-police-forces/606065001/|access-date=June 17, 2020|work=[[USA Today]]|date=August 28, 2017}}</ref> and reinstated the use of civil [[asset forfeiture]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Sessions reinstates asset forfeiture policy at Justice Department|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sessions-signals-more-police-property-seizures-coming-from-justice-department/ |work=CBS News |date=July 19, 2017 |agency=CBS/AP |access-date=July 19, 2017}}</ref> The administration stated that it would no longer investigate police departments and publicize their shortcomings in reports, a policy previously enacted under the Obama administration. Later, Trump falsely claimed that the Obama administration never tried to reform the police.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Timm|first=Jane|title=Trump says Obama didn't reform policing – but he did. Then the president ditched it.|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1231200|access-date=June 17, 2020|work=[[NBC News]]|date=June 16, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Benner|first=Katie|title=Sessions, in Last-Minute Act, Sharply Limits Use of Consent Decrees to Curb Police Abuses|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/us/politics/sessions-limits-consent-decrees.html|access-date=June 17, 2020|work=The New York Times|date=November 8, 2018|archive-url=https://archive.today/20181109033145/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/us/politics/sessions-limits-consent-decrees.html|archive-date=November 9, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
The ''New York Times'' summarized the Trump administration's "general approach to law enforcement" as "cracking down on violent crime", "not regulating the police departments that fight it", and overhauling "programs that the Obama administration used to ease tensions between communities and the police".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Eder|first1=Steve|last2=Protess|first2=Ben|last3=Dewan|first3=Shaila|date=November 21, 2017|title=How Trump's Hands-Off Approach to Policing Is Frustrating Some Chiefs|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/21/us/trump-justice-department-police.html|access-date=November 22, 2017|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Trump reversed a ban on providing federal military equipment to [[Local law enforcement in the United States|local police departments]]<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Johnson|first=Kevin|title=Trump lifts ban on military gear to local police forces|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/08/27/trump-expected-lift-ban-military-gear-local-police-forces/606065001/|access-date=June 17, 2020|work=USA Today|date=August 28, 2017}}</ref> and reinstated the use of civil [[asset forfeiture]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Sessions reinstates asset forfeiture policy at Justice Department|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sessions-signals-more-police-property-seizures-coming-from-justice-department/ |work=CBS News |date=July 19, 2017 |agency=CBS/AP |access-date=July 19, 2017}}</ref> The administration stated that it would no longer investigate police departments and publicize their shortcomings in reports, a policy previously enacted under the Obama administration. Later, Trump falsely claimed that the Obama administration never tried to reform the police.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Timm|first=Jane|title=Trump says Obama didn't reform policing – but he did. Then the president ditched it.|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1231200|access-date=June 17, 2020|work=[[NBC News]]|date=June 16, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Benner|first=Katie|title=Sessions, in Last-Minute Act, Sharply Limits Use of Consent Decrees to Curb Police Abuses|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/us/politics/sessions-limits-consent-decrees.html|access-date=June 17, 2020|work=The New York Times|date=November 8, 2018|archive-url=https://archive.today/20181109033145/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/us/politics/sessions-limits-consent-decrees.html|archive-date=November 9, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>


In December 2017, Sessions and the Department of Justice rescinded a 2016 guideline advising courts against imposing large fines and fees on poor defendants.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/43qxqp/jeff-sessions-is-cool-with-towns-like-ferguson-fining-the-poor-into-oblivion |first=Taylor |last=Dolven |title=Jeff Sessions gives OK for towns like Ferguson to hit the poor with heavy fines |access-date=December 26, 2017 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171226130441/https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/43qxqp/jeff-sessions-is-cool-with-towns-like-ferguson-fining-the-poor-into-oblivion |archive-date=December 26, 2017|date=December 22, 2017}}</ref>
In December 2017, Sessions and the Department of Justice rescinded a 2016 guideline advising courts against imposing large fines and fees on poor defendants.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/43qxqp/jeff-sessions-is-cool-with-towns-like-ferguson-fining-the-poor-into-oblivion |first=Taylor |last=Dolven |title=Jeff Sessions gives OK for towns like Ferguson to hit the poor with heavy fines |access-date=December 26, 2017 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171226130441/https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/43qxqp/jeff-sessions-is-cool-with-towns-like-ferguson-fining-the-poor-into-oblivion |archive-date=December 26, 2017|date=December 22, 2017}}</ref>
Line 304: Line 304:
[[File:President Donald J. Trump at the G20 Summit (44300765490).jpg|thumb|right|Trump signs the [[United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement]] (USMCA) alongside Mexican president [[Enrique Peña Nieto]] and Canadian prime minister [[Justin Trudeau]] in [[Buenos Aires]], Argentina, November 30, 2018.]]
[[File:President Donald J. Trump at the G20 Summit (44300765490).jpg|thumb|right|Trump signs the [[United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement]] (USMCA) alongside Mexican president [[Enrique Peña Nieto]] and Canadian prime minister [[Justin Trudeau]] in [[Buenos Aires]], Argentina, November 30, 2018.]]
[[File:Signing Ceremony Phase One Trade Deal Between the U.S. & China (49391434906).jpg|thumb|right|Trump and Chinese Vice Premier [[Liu He (politician)|Liu He]] sign the Phase One [[China–United States trade war|Trade Deal]], January 15, 2020.]]
[[File:Signing Ceremony Phase One Trade Deal Between the U.S. & China (49391434906).jpg|thumb|right|Trump and Chinese Vice Premier [[Liu He (politician)|Liu He]] sign the Phase One [[China–United States trade war|Trade Deal]], January 15, 2020.]]
In March 2018, Trump imposed tariffs on [[solar panel]]s and [[washing machine]]s of 30–50%.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Gonzales |first=Richard |date=January 22, 2018 |title=Trump Slaps Tariffs On Imported Solar Panels and Washing Machines |access-date=November 10, 2021 |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/22/579848409/trump-slaps-tariffs-on-imported-solar-panels-and-washing-machines |work=[[NPR]]}}</ref> In March 2018, he imposed tariffs on [[steel]] (25%) and [[aluminum]] (10%) from most countries,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Horsley|first=Scott|date=March 8, 2018|title=Trump Formally Orders Tariffs on Steel, Aluminum Imports|url=https://www.npr.org/2018/03/08/591744195/trump-expected-to-formally-order-tariffs-on-steel-aluminum-imports |access-date=November 10, 2021 |work=[[NPR]]}}</ref><ref name="Long">{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Long|first=Heather|date=May 31, 2018|title=Trump has officially put more tariffs on U.S. allies than on China|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/05/31/trump-has-officially-put-more-tariffs-on-u-s-allies-than-on-china/ |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> which covered an estimated 4.1% of U.S. imports.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Chance|first=David|date=March 5, 2018|title=Trump's trade tariffs: Long on rhetoric, short on impact?|work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-trump-rhetoric-analysis/trumps-trade-tariffs-long-on-rhetoric-short-on-impact-idUSKBN1GH37N |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> On June 1, 2018, this was extended to the [[European Union]], [[Canada]], and [[Mexico]].<ref name="Long" /> In separate moves, the Trump administration has set and escalated tariffs on goods imported from [[China]], leading to [[China–United States trade war|a trade war]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=Danielle |last1=Paquette |first2=David J. |last2=Lynch |first3=Emily |last3=Rauhala |title=As Trump's trade war starts, China retaliates with comparable tariffs of its own|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/china-fires-back-at-us-tariffs-vows-to-defend-its-core-interests/2018/07/06/f42fc812-8091-11e8-a63f-7b5d2aba7ac5_story.html |date=July 6, 2018 |access-date=July 6, 2018|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> The tariffs angered trading partners, who implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||date=June 1, 2018|title=US tariffs a dangerous game, says EU|work=[[BBC News]]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-44324565 |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> and adversely affected real income and GDP.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite journal||last1=Amiti|first1=Mary|author1-link=Mary Amiti|last2=Redding|first2=Stephen J.|author2-link=Stephen Redding|last3=Weinstein|first3=David E.|author3-link=David E. Weinstein|year=2019|title=The Impact of the 2018 Tariffs on Prices and Welfare|journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives|volume=33|issue=Fall 2019|pages=187–210|doi=10.1257/jep.33.4.187|doi-access=free}}</ref> A CNBC analysis found that Trump "enacted tariffs equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in decades", while [[Tax Foundation]] and [[Tax Policy Center]] analyses found the tariffs could wipe out the benefits of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for many households.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||title=Trump Tariffs Could Wipe Out Tax Cuts for Many Households|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-tariffs-could-wipe-tax-142911498.html |work=Yahoo! Finance |date=May 16, 2019 |first=Michael |last=Rainey |access-date=November 8, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=May 14, 2019|title=For Many Households, Trump's Tariffs Could Wipe Out The Benefits of the TCJA|url=https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/many-households-trumps-tariffs-could-wipe-out-benefits-tcja |first=Howard |last=Gleckman |access-date=November 10, 2021 |website=Tax Policy Center}}</ref> The two countries reached a "phase one" truce agreement in January 2020. The bulk of the tariffs remained in place until talks were to resume after the 2020 election. Trump provided $28 billion in cash aid to farmers affected by the trade war.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last2=Daly |first1=Hallie |last1=Gu |first2=Tom |date=August 5, 2019 |title=U.S. farmers suffer 'body blow' as China slams door on farm purchases |newspaper=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-agriculture-idUSKCN1UV0XJ |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Swanson|first1=Ana|last2=Rappeport|first2=Alan|date=June 23, 2020|title=Trump Signs China Trade Deal, Putting Economic Conflict on Pause|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/15/business/economy/china-trade-deal.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Rappeport|first=Alan|date=February 18, 2020|title=U.S. Watchdog to Investigate Trump's Farm Bailout Program|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/14/us/politics/trump-farm-bailout-investigation.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> Studies have found that the tariffs also adversely affected Republican candidates in elections.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite journal||last1=Blanchard|first1=Emily J|last2=Bown|first2=Chad P|last3=Chor|first3=Davin|date=2019|title=Did Trump's Trade War Impact the 2018 Election?|url=https://www.nber.org/papers/w26434 |publisher=[[National Bureau of Economic Research]] |journal=NBER Working Paper Series |series=Working Paper Series |doi=10.3386/w26434 |s2cid=207992615 |id=Working Paper 26434 |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> An analysis published by ''The Wall Street Journal'' in October 2020 found the trade war did not achieve the primary objective of reviving American manufacturing, nor did it result in the [[reshoring]] of factory production.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Zumbrun|first=Josh|date=October 25, 2020|title=China Trade War Didn't Boost U.S. Manufacturing Might|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-trade-war-didnt-boost-u-s-manufacturing-might-11603618203 |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref>
In March 2018, Trump imposed tariffs on [[solar panel]]s and [[washing machine]]s of 30–50%.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Gonzales |first=Richard |date=January 22, 2018 |title=Trump Slaps Tariffs On Imported Solar Panels and Washing Machines |access-date=November 10, 2021 |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/22/579848409/trump-slaps-tariffs-on-imported-solar-panels-and-washing-machines |work=[[NPR]]}}</ref> In March 2018, he imposed tariffs on [[steel]] (25%) and [[aluminum]] (10%) from most countries,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Horsley|first=Scott|date=March 8, 2018|title=Trump Formally Orders Tariffs on Steel, Aluminum Imports|url=https://www.npr.org/2018/03/08/591744195/trump-expected-to-formally-order-tariffs-on-steel-aluminum-imports |access-date=November 10, 2021 |work=[[NPR]]}}</ref><ref name="Long">{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Long|first=Heather|date=May 31, 2018|title=Trump has officially put more tariffs on U.S. allies than on China|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/05/31/trump-has-officially-put-more-tariffs-on-u-s-allies-than-on-china/ |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> which covered an estimated 4.1% of U.S. imports.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Chance|first=David|date=March 5, 2018|title=Trump's trade tariffs: Long on rhetoric, short on impact?|work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-trump-rhetoric-analysis/trumps-trade-tariffs-long-on-rhetoric-short-on-impact-idUSKBN1GH37N |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> On June 1, 2018, this was extended to the [[European Union]], [[Canada]], and [[Mexico]].<ref name="Long" /> In separate moves, the Trump administration has set and escalated tariffs on goods imported from China, leading to [[China–United States trade war|a trade war]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=Danielle |last1=Paquette |first2=David J. |last2=Lynch |first3=Emily |last3=Rauhala |title=As Trump's trade war starts, China retaliates with comparable tariffs of its own|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/china-fires-back-at-us-tariffs-vows-to-defend-its-core-interests/2018/07/06/f42fc812-8091-11e8-a63f-7b5d2aba7ac5_story.html |date=July 6, 2018 |access-date=July 6, 2018|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> The tariffs angered trading partners, who implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||date=June 1, 2018|title=US tariffs a dangerous game, says EU|work=[[BBC News]]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-44324565 |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> and adversely affected real income and GDP.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite journal||last1=Amiti|first1=Mary|author1-link=Mary Amiti|last2=Redding|first2=Stephen J.|author2-link=Stephen Redding|last3=Weinstein|first3=David E.|author3-link=David E. Weinstein|year=2019|title=The Impact of the 2018 Tariffs on Prices and Welfare|journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives|volume=33|issue=Fall 2019|pages=187–210|doi=10.1257/jep.33.4.187|doi-access=free}}</ref> A CNBC analysis found that Trump "enacted tariffs equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in decades", while [[Tax Foundation]] and [[Tax Policy Center]] analyses found the tariffs could wipe out the benefits of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for many households.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||title=Trump Tariffs Could Wipe Out Tax Cuts for Many Households|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-tariffs-could-wipe-tax-142911498.html |work=Yahoo! Finance |date=May 16, 2019 |first=Michael |last=Rainey |access-date=November 8, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=May 14, 2019|title=For Many Households, Trump's Tariffs Could Wipe Out The Benefits of the TCJA|url=https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/many-households-trumps-tariffs-could-wipe-out-benefits-tcja |first=Howard |last=Gleckman |access-date=November 10, 2021 |website=Tax Policy Center}}</ref> The two countries reached a "phase one" truce agreement in January 2020. The bulk of the tariffs remained in place until talks were to resume after the 2020 election. Trump provided $28 billion in cash aid to farmers affected by the trade war.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last2=Daly |first1=Hallie |last1=Gu |first2=Tom |date=August 5, 2019 |title=U.S. farmers suffer 'body blow' as China slams door on farm purchases |newspaper=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-agriculture-idUSKCN1UV0XJ |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Swanson|first1=Ana|last2=Rappeport|first2=Alan|date=June 23, 2020|title=Trump Signs China Trade Deal, Putting Economic Conflict on Pause|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/15/business/economy/china-trade-deal.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Rappeport|first=Alan|date=February 18, 2020|title=U.S. Watchdog to Investigate Trump's Farm Bailout Program|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/14/us/politics/trump-farm-bailout-investigation.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> Studies have found that the tariffs also adversely affected Republican candidates in elections.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite journal||last1=Blanchard|first1=Emily J|last2=Bown|first2=Chad P|last3=Chor|first3=Davin|date=2019|title=Did Trump's Trade War Impact the 2018 Election?|url=https://www.nber.org/papers/w26434 |publisher=[[National Bureau of Economic Research]] |journal=NBER Working Paper Series |series=Working Paper Series |doi=10.3386/w26434 |s2cid=207992615 |id=Working Paper 26434 |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> An analysis published by ''The Wall Street Journal'' in October 2020 found the trade war did not achieve the primary objective of reviving American manufacturing, nor did it result in the [[reshoring]] of factory production.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Zumbrun|first=Josh|date=October 25, 2020|title=China Trade War Didn't Boost U.S. Manufacturing Might|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-trade-war-didnt-boost-u-s-manufacturing-might-11603618203 |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref>


Three weeks after Republican senator [[Chuck Grassley]], chairman of the [[Senate Finance Committee]], wrote an April 2019 ''Wall Street Journal'' op-ed entitled "Trump's Tariffs End or His Trade Deal Dies", stating "Congress won't approve [[USMCA]] while constituents pay the price for Mexican and Canadian retaliation," Trump lifted steel and aluminum tariffs on Mexico and Canada.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Salama|first1=Vivian|last2=Zumbrun|first2=Josh|last3=Mackrael|first3=Kim|date=May 17, 2019|title=U.S. Reaches Deal With Canada, Mexico to End Steel and Aluminum Tariffs|newspaper=Wall Street Journal|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-close-to-deal-with-canada-mexico-to-end-steel-and-aluminum-tariffs-11558110448 |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> Two weeks later, Trump unexpectedly announced he would impose a 5% tariff on all imports from Mexico on June 10, increasing to 10% on July 1, and by another 5% each month for three months, "until such time as illegal migrants coming through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Karni|first1=Annie|last2=Swanson|first2=Ana|last3=Shear|first3=Michael D.|date=May 30, 2019|title=Trump Says U.S. Will Hit Mexico With 5% Tariffs on All Goods|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/us/politics/trump-mexico-tariffs.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> Grassley commented the move as a "misuse of presidential tariff authority and counter to congressional intent".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump says U.S. to impose 5 percent tariff on all Mexican imports beginning June 10 in dramatic escalation of border clash|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/trump-prepares-to-threaten-mexico-with-new-tariffs-in-attempt-to-force-migrant-crackdown/2019/05/30/0f05f01e-8314-11e9-bce7-40b4105f7ca0_story.html |first1=Damian |last1=Paletta |first2=Nick |last2=Miroff |first3=Josh |last3=Dawsey |date=May 30, 2019 |access-date=November 10, 2021 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> That same day, the Trump administration formally initiated the process to seek congressional approval of USMCA.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||title=Trump Pushes USMCA Approval Plan in Move That Irks Pelosi|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-30/trump-plows-ahead-with-usmca-approval-plan-as-democrats-waver |access-date=November 10, 2021 |date=May 30, 2019 |first1=Jenny |last1=Leonard |first2=Erik |last2=Wasson |website=[[Bloomberg LP]]}}</ref> Trump's top trade advisor, [[Office of the United States Trade Representative|U.S. Trade Representative]] [[Robert Lighthizer]], opposed the new Mexican tariffs on concerns it would jeopardize passage of USMCA.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Salama |first1=Vivian |last2=Mauldin |first2=William |last3=Lucey |first3=Catherine |date=June 1, 2019|title=Trump's Threat of Tariffs on Mexico Prompts Outcry |access-date=November 10, 2021 |newspaper=[[Wall Street Journal]] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-top-trade-adviser-opposed-mexican-tariffs-11559320692}}</ref> Treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin and Trump senior advisor Jared Kushner also opposed the action. Grassley, whose committee is instrumental in passing USMCA, was not informed in advance of Trump's surprise announcement.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump defies close advisers in deciding to threaten Mexico with disruptive tariffs|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-defies-close-advisers-in-deciding-to-threaten-mexico-with-disruptive-tariffs/2019/05/31/d87ae82c-83ba-11e9-bce7-40b4105f7ca0_story.html |first1=Seung Min |last1=Kim |first2=Josh |last2=Dawsey |first3=Damian |last3=Paletta |date=May 31, 2021 |access-date=November 10, 2021 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> On June 7, Trump announced the tariffs would be "indefinitely suspended" after Mexico agreed to take actions, including deploying its [[National Guard (Mexico)|National Guard]] throughout the country and along its southern border.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Shear|first1=Michael D.|last2=Swanson|first2=Ana|last3=Ahmed|first3=Azam|date=June 7, 2019|title=Trump Calls Off Plan to Impose Tariffs on Mexico|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/07/us/politics/trump-tariffs-mexico.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> ''The New York Times'' reported the following day that Mexico had actually agreed to most of the actions months earlier.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Shear|first1=Michael D. |last2=Haberman |first2=Maggie |date=June 8, 2019|title=Mexico Agreed to Take Border Actions Months Before Trump Announced Tariff Deal |newspaper=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/08/us/politics/trump-mexico-deal-tariffs.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref>
Three weeks after Republican senator [[Chuck Grassley]], chairman of the [[Senate Finance Committee]], wrote an April 2019 ''Wall Street Journal'' op-ed entitled "Trump's Tariffs End or His Trade Deal Dies", stating "Congress won't approve [[USMCA]] while constituents pay the price for Mexican and Canadian retaliation," Trump lifted steel and aluminum tariffs on Mexico and Canada.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Salama|first1=Vivian|last2=Zumbrun|first2=Josh|last3=Mackrael|first3=Kim|date=May 17, 2019|title=U.S. Reaches Deal With Canada, Mexico to End Steel and Aluminum Tariffs|newspaper=Wall Street Journal|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-close-to-deal-with-canada-mexico-to-end-steel-and-aluminum-tariffs-11558110448 |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> Two weeks later, Trump unexpectedly announced he would impose a 5% tariff on all imports from Mexico on June 10, increasing to 10% on July 1, and by another 5% each month for three months, "until such time as illegal migrants coming through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Karni|first1=Annie|last2=Swanson|first2=Ana|last3=Shear|first3=Michael D.|date=May 30, 2019|title=Trump Says U.S. Will Hit Mexico With 5% Tariffs on All Goods|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/us/politics/trump-mexico-tariffs.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> Grassley commented the move as a "misuse of presidential tariff authority and counter to congressional intent".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump says U.S. to impose 5 percent tariff on all Mexican imports beginning June 10 in dramatic escalation of border clash|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/trump-prepares-to-threaten-mexico-with-new-tariffs-in-attempt-to-force-migrant-crackdown/2019/05/30/0f05f01e-8314-11e9-bce7-40b4105f7ca0_story.html |first1=Damian |last1=Paletta |first2=Nick |last2=Miroff |first3=Josh |last3=Dawsey |date=May 30, 2019 |access-date=November 10, 2021 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> That same day, the Trump administration formally initiated the process to seek congressional approval of USMCA.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||title=Trump Pushes USMCA Approval Plan in Move That Irks Pelosi|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-30/trump-plows-ahead-with-usmca-approval-plan-as-democrats-waver |access-date=November 10, 2021 |date=May 30, 2019 |first1=Jenny |last1=Leonard |first2=Erik |last2=Wasson |website=[[Bloomberg LP]]}}</ref> Trump's top trade advisor, [[Office of the United States Trade Representative|U.S. Trade Representative]] [[Robert Lighthizer]], opposed the new Mexican tariffs on concerns it would jeopardize passage of USMCA.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Salama |first1=Vivian |last2=Mauldin |first2=William |last3=Lucey |first3=Catherine |date=June 1, 2019|title=Trump's Threat of Tariffs on Mexico Prompts Outcry |access-date=November 10, 2021 |newspaper=[[Wall Street Journal]] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-top-trade-adviser-opposed-mexican-tariffs-11559320692}}</ref> Treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin and Trump senior advisor Jared Kushner also opposed the action. Grassley, whose committee is instrumental in passing USMCA, was not informed in advance of Trump's surprise announcement.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump defies close advisers in deciding to threaten Mexico with disruptive tariffs|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-defies-close-advisers-in-deciding-to-threaten-mexico-with-disruptive-tariffs/2019/05/31/d87ae82c-83ba-11e9-bce7-40b4105f7ca0_story.html |first1=Seung Min |last1=Kim |first2=Josh |last2=Dawsey |first3=Damian |last3=Paletta |date=May 31, 2021 |access-date=November 10, 2021 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> On June 7, Trump announced the tariffs would be "indefinitely suspended" after Mexico agreed to take actions, including deploying its [[National Guard (Mexico)|National Guard]] throughout the country and along its southern border.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Shear|first1=Michael D.|last2=Swanson|first2=Ana|last3=Ahmed|first3=Azam|date=June 7, 2019|title=Trump Calls Off Plan to Impose Tariffs on Mexico|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/07/us/politics/trump-tariffs-mexico.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> ''The New York Times'' reported the following day that Mexico had actually agreed to most of the actions months earlier.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Shear|first1=Michael D. |last2=Haberman |first2=Maggie |date=June 8, 2019|title=Mexico Agreed to Take Border Actions Months Before Trump Announced Tariff Deal |newspaper=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/08/us/politics/trump-mexico-deal-tariffs.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref>
Line 374: Line 374:
=== Guns ===
=== Guns ===
{{Main|Gun law in the United States}}
{{Main|Gun law in the United States}}
The administration banned [[bump stock]]s after such devices were used by the gunman who perpetrated the [[2017 Las Vegas shooting]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||title=The US Supreme Court Is Letting The Trump Administration's Bump Stocks Ban Take Effect|url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/bump-stocks-ban-nationwide-gun-control-supreme-court |first=Zoe |last=Tillman |date=April 5, 2019 |access-date=July 13, 2019 |website=[[BuzzFeed News]]}}</ref> In the wake of several [[mass shootings in the United States|mass shootings]] during the Trump administration, including [[2019 El Paso shooting|August 2019 shootings in El Paso, Texas]], and [[2019 Dayton shooting|Dayton, Ohio]], Trump called on states to implement [[red flag law]]s to remove guns from "those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Lawrence|first=Elizabeth|date=August 5, 2019|title=After back to back shootings, Trump called for red flag laws. Here's what they are.|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/08/05/dayton-el-paso-shootings-what-red-flag-laws/1922428001/|work=[[USA Today]]}}</ref> By November 2019, he abandoned the idea of red-flag laws.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Josh |last=Dawsey |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-quietly-abandons-proposing-ideas-to-curb-gun-violence-after-saying-he-would-following-mass-shootings/2019/10/31/8bca030c-fa6e-11e9-9534-e0dbcc9f5683_story.html |title=Trump abandons proposing ideas to curb gun violence after saying he would following mass shootings |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=November 1, 2019}}</ref> Trump repealed a regulation that barred gun ownership from approximately 75,000 individuals who received [[Social Security (United States)|Social Security]] checks due to mental illness and who were deemed unfit to handle their financial affairs.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Vitali|first=Ali|title=Trump Signs Bill Revoking Obama-Era Gun Checks for People With Mental Illnesses|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-signs-bill-revoking-obama-era-gun-checks-people-mental-n727221 |date=March 1, 2017 |work=[[NBC News]]|access-date=February 16, 2018}}</ref> The administration ended U.S. involvement in the UN [[Arms Trade Treaty]] to curb the international trade of conventional arms with countries having poor human rights records.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||first=Bill|last=Chappell|url=https://www.npr.org/2019/04/26/717547741/trump-moves-to-withdraw-u-s-from-u-n-arms-trade-treaty|title=Trump Moves To Withdraw U.S. From U.N. Arms Trade Treaty|work=[[NPR]]|date=April 26, 2019}}</ref>
The administration banned [[bump stock]]s after such devices were used by the gunman who perpetrated the [[2017 Las Vegas shooting]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||title=The US Supreme Court Is Letting The Trump Administration's Bump Stocks Ban Take Effect|url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/bump-stocks-ban-nationwide-gun-control-supreme-court |first=Zoe |last=Tillman |date=April 5, 2019 |access-date=July 13, 2019 |website=[[BuzzFeed News]]}}</ref> In the wake of several [[mass shootings in the United States|mass shootings]] during the Trump administration, including [[2019 El Paso shooting|August 2019 shootings in El Paso, Texas]], and [[2019 Dayton shooting|Dayton, Ohio]], Trump called on states to implement [[red flag law]]s to remove guns from "those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Lawrence|first=Elizabeth|date=August 5, 2019|title=After back to back shootings, Trump called for red flag laws. Here's what they are.|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/08/05/dayton-el-paso-shootings-what-red-flag-laws/1922428001/|work=USA Today}}</ref> By November 2019, he abandoned the idea of red-flag laws.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Josh |last=Dawsey |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-quietly-abandons-proposing-ideas-to-curb-gun-violence-after-saying-he-would-following-mass-shootings/2019/10/31/8bca030c-fa6e-11e9-9534-e0dbcc9f5683_story.html |title=Trump abandons proposing ideas to curb gun violence after saying he would following mass shootings |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=November 1, 2019}}</ref> Trump repealed a regulation that barred gun ownership from approximately 75,000 individuals who received [[Social Security (United States)|Social Security]] checks due to mental illness and who were deemed unfit to handle their financial affairs.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Vitali|first=Ali|title=Trump Signs Bill Revoking Obama-Era Gun Checks for People With Mental Illnesses|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-signs-bill-revoking-obama-era-gun-checks-people-mental-n727221 |date=March 1, 2017 |work=[[NBC News]]|access-date=February 16, 2018}}</ref> The administration ended U.S. involvement in the UN [[Arms Trade Treaty]] to curb the international trade of conventional arms with countries having poor human rights records.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||first=Bill|last=Chappell|url=https://www.npr.org/2019/04/26/717547741/trump-moves-to-withdraw-u-s-from-u-n-arms-trade-treaty|title=Trump Moves To Withdraw U.S. From U.N. Arms Trade Treaty|work=[[NPR]]|date=April 26, 2019}}</ref>


=== Health care ===
=== Health care ===
Line 417: Line 417:
In 2018, before the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trump administration reorganized the Global Health Security and Biodefense unit at the NSC by merging it with other related units.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/387191-trump-official-overseeing-pandemic-response-suddenly-leaves-admin|title=Trump official overseeing pandemic readiness exits|last=Thomsen|first=Jacqueline|website=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|access-date=February 26, 2020|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105175454/https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/387191-trump-official-overseeing-pandemic-response-suddenly-leaves-admin |date=May 10, 2018 |archive-date=November 5, 2020}}</ref> Two months prior to the [[Wuhan outbreak|outbreak in Wuhan China]], the Trump Administration had cut nearly $200 million in funding to Chinese research scientists studying animal [[coronavirus]]es.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Baumgaertner|first1=Emily|last2=Rainey|first2=James|date=April 2, 2020|title=Trump administration ended pandemic early-warning program to detect coronaviruses|url=https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-04-02/coronavirus-trump-pandemic-program-viruses-detection|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210103154422/https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-04-02/coronavirus-trump-pandemic-program-viruses-detection|archive-date=January 3, 2021|access-date=April 3, 2020|website=Los Angeles Times}}</ref> Throughout his presidency he also proposed budget cuts to global health.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Finnegan|first=Conor|title=Trump budget proposes cuts to global health amid two global health crises|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-budget-proposes-cuts-global-health-amid-global/story?id=68911515 |date=February 12, 2020 |access-date=February 26, 2020|website=[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]]}}</ref> The Trump administration ignored detailed plans on how to mass-produce [[Protective mask|protective respirator masks]] under a program that had been launched by the Obama administration to alleviate a mask shortage for a future pandemic.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/federal-government-spent-millions-to-ramp-up-mask-readiness-but-that-isnt-helping-now/2020/04/03/d62dda5c-74fa-11ea-a9bd-9f8b593300d0_story.html|title=Federal government spent millions to ramp up mask readiness, but that isn't helping now|last=Swaine|first=Jon|date=April 3, 2020|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref>
In 2018, before the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trump administration reorganized the Global Health Security and Biodefense unit at the NSC by merging it with other related units.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/387191-trump-official-overseeing-pandemic-response-suddenly-leaves-admin|title=Trump official overseeing pandemic readiness exits|last=Thomsen|first=Jacqueline|website=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|access-date=February 26, 2020|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105175454/https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/387191-trump-official-overseeing-pandemic-response-suddenly-leaves-admin |date=May 10, 2018 |archive-date=November 5, 2020}}</ref> Two months prior to the [[Wuhan outbreak|outbreak in Wuhan China]], the Trump Administration had cut nearly $200 million in funding to Chinese research scientists studying animal [[coronavirus]]es.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Baumgaertner|first1=Emily|last2=Rainey|first2=James|date=April 2, 2020|title=Trump administration ended pandemic early-warning program to detect coronaviruses|url=https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-04-02/coronavirus-trump-pandemic-program-viruses-detection|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210103154422/https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-04-02/coronavirus-trump-pandemic-program-viruses-detection|archive-date=January 3, 2021|access-date=April 3, 2020|website=Los Angeles Times}}</ref> Throughout his presidency he also proposed budget cuts to global health.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Finnegan|first=Conor|title=Trump budget proposes cuts to global health amid two global health crises|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-budget-proposes-cuts-global-health-amid-global/story?id=68911515 |date=February 12, 2020 |access-date=February 26, 2020|website=[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]]}}</ref> The Trump administration ignored detailed plans on how to mass-produce [[Protective mask|protective respirator masks]] under a program that had been launched by the Obama administration to alleviate a mask shortage for a future pandemic.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/federal-government-spent-millions-to-ramp-up-mask-readiness-but-that-isnt-helping-now/2020/04/03/d62dda5c-74fa-11ea-a9bd-9f8b593300d0_story.html|title=Federal government spent millions to ramp up mask readiness, but that isn't helping now|last=Swaine|first=Jon|date=April 3, 2020|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref>


From January to mid-March 2020, Trump consistently downplayed the threat posed by COVID-19 to the United States, giving many optimistic public statements.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Blake|first=Aaron|date=March 17, 2020|title=A timeline of Trump playing down the coronavirus threat|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/03/12/trump-coronavirus-timeline/|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref> He accused Democrats and media outlets of exaggerating the seriousness of the situation, describing Democrats' criticism of his administration's response as a "hoax".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Mangan|first=Dan|date=March 17, 2019|title=Trump dismissed coronavirus pandemic worry in January – now claims he long warned about it|work=[[CNBC]]|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/17/trump-dissed-coronavirus-pandemic-worry-now-claims-he-warned-about-it.html|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Rupar|first=Aaron|date=March 18, 2020|title=Trump spent weeks downplaying the coronavirus. He's now pretending that never happened.|work=[[Vox (website)|Vox]]|url=https://www.vox.com/2020/3/18/21184945/trump-coronavirus-comments-then-versus-now|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref> By March 2020, however, Trump had adopted a more somber tone on the matter, acknowledging for the first time that COVID-19 was "not under control".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Dale|first=Daniel|date=March 17, 2020|title=Fact check: Trump tries to erase the memory of him downplaying the coronavirus|work=CNN|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/17/politics/fact-check-trump-always-knew-pandemic-coronavirus/index.html|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||date=March 18, 2020|title=Analysis: US presidential politics in the time of coronavirus|work=[[Al Jazeera Media Network|Al Jazeera]]|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/03/analysis-presidential-politics-time-coronavirus-200317202843984.html|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref> Although the CDC recommended people wear [[Face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States|face masks]] in public when [[social distancing]] is not possible, Trump continually refused to wear one.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Lizza |first1=Ryan |last2=Lippman |first2=Daniel |title=Wearing a mask is for smug liberals. Refusing to is for reckless Republicans. |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/01/masks-politics-coronavirus-227765 |date=May 1, 2020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120214749/https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/01/masks-politics-coronavirus-227765 |archive-date=November 20, 2020 |access-date=June 8, 2020 |website=[[Politico]]}}</ref> He praised and encouraged protesters who violated [[stay-at-home order]]s in Democratic states, as well as praised Republican governors who violated the White House's own COVID-19 guidelines regarding re-opening their economies.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Smith|first=David|date=April 18, 2020|title=Trump calls protesters against stay-at-home orders 'very responsible'|work=[[The Guardian]]|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/17/trump-liberate-tweets-coronavirus-stay-at-home-orders|url-status=live|access-date=May 16, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107092730/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/17/trump-liberate-tweets-coronavirus-stay-at-home-orders|archive-date=November 7, 2020|issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||date=May 4, 2020 |title=Trump cheers on governors even as they ignore White House coronavirus guidelines in race to reopen |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |first1=Toluse |last1=Olorunnipa |first2=Griff |last2=Witte |first3=Lenny |last3=Bernstein |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-cheers-on-governors-as-they-ignore-white-house-coronovirus-guidelines-in-race-to-reopen/2020/05/04/bedc6116-8e18-11ea-a0bc-4e9ad4866d21_story.html |url-status=live |access-date=November 22, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121225809/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-cheers-on-governors-as-they-ignore-white-house-coronovirus-guidelines-in-race-to-reopen/2020/05/04/bedc6116-8e18-11ea-a0bc-4e9ad4866d21_story.html |archive-date=November 21, 2020}}</ref>
From January to mid-March 2020, Trump consistently downplayed the threat posed by COVID-19 to the United States, giving many optimistic public statements.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Blake|first=Aaron|date=March 17, 2020|title=A timeline of Trump playing down the coronavirus threat|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/03/12/trump-coronavirus-timeline/|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref> He accused Democrats and media outlets of exaggerating the seriousness of the situation, describing Democrats' criticism of his administration's response as a "hoax".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Mangan|first=Dan|date=March 17, 2019|title=Trump dismissed coronavirus pandemic worry in January – now claims he long warned about it|work=[[CNBC]]|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/17/trump-dissed-coronavirus-pandemic-worry-now-claims-he-warned-about-it.html|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Rupar|first=Aaron|date=March 18, 2020|title=Trump spent weeks downplaying the coronavirus. He's now pretending that never happened.|work=[[Vox (website)|Vox]]|url=https://www.vox.com/2020/3/18/21184945/trump-coronavirus-comments-then-versus-now|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref> By March 2020, however, Trump had adopted a more somber tone on the matter, acknowledging for the first time that COVID-19 was "not under control".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Dale|first=Daniel|date=March 17, 2020|title=Fact check: Trump tries to erase the memory of him downplaying the coronavirus|work=CNN|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/17/politics/fact-check-trump-always-knew-pandemic-coronavirus/index.html|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||date=March 18, 2020|title=Analysis: US presidential politics in the time of coronavirus|work=[[Al Jazeera Media Network|Al Jazeera]]|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/03/analysis-presidential-politics-time-coronavirus-200317202843984.html|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref> Although the CDC recommended people wear [[Face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States|face masks]] in public when [[social distancing]] is not possible, Trump continually refused to wear one.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Lizza |first1=Ryan |last2=Lippman |first2=Daniel |title=Wearing a mask is for smug liberals. Refusing to is for reckless Republicans. |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/01/masks-politics-coronavirus-227765 |date=May 1, 2020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120214749/https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/01/masks-politics-coronavirus-227765 |archive-date=November 20, 2020 |access-date=June 8, 2020 |website=[[Politico]]}}</ref> He praised and encouraged protesters who violated [[stay-at-home order]]s in Democratic states, as well as praised Republican governors who violated the White House's own COVID-19 guidelines regarding re-opening their economies.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Smith|first=David|date=April 18, 2020|title=Trump calls protesters against stay-at-home orders 'very responsible'|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/17/trump-liberate-tweets-coronavirus-stay-at-home-orders|url-status=live|access-date=May 16, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107092730/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/17/trump-liberate-tweets-coronavirus-stay-at-home-orders|archive-date=November 7, 2020|issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||date=May 4, 2020 |title=Trump cheers on governors even as they ignore White House coronavirus guidelines in race to reopen |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |first1=Toluse |last1=Olorunnipa |first2=Griff |last2=Witte |first3=Lenny |last3=Bernstein |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-cheers-on-governors-as-they-ignore-white-house-coronovirus-guidelines-in-race-to-reopen/2020/05/04/bedc6116-8e18-11ea-a0bc-4e9ad4866d21_story.html |url-status=live |access-date=November 22, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121225809/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-cheers-on-governors-as-they-ignore-white-house-coronovirus-guidelines-in-race-to-reopen/2020/05/04/bedc6116-8e18-11ea-a0bc-4e9ad4866d21_story.html |archive-date=November 21, 2020}}</ref>


The [[White House Coronavirus Task Force]] was led by Vice President Mike Pence, Coronavirus Response Coordinator [[Deborah Birx]], and Trump's son-in-law [[Jared Kushner]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Shear|first1=Michael|last2=Weiland|first2=Noah|last3=Rogers|first3=Katie|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/26/us/politics/trump-coronavirus-cdc.html|title=Trump Names Mike Pence to Lead Coronavirus Response|date=February 26, 2020|work=The New York Times|access-date=February 27, 2020|archive-url=https://archive.today/20200227003735/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/26/us/politics/trump-coronavirus-cdc.html|archive-date=February 27, 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> Congress appropriated $8.3{{spaces}}billion in emergency funding, which Trump signed into [[Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act|law]] on March 6.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Keith|first=Tamara|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/03/06/812825943/trump-signs-coronavirus-funding-bill-cancels-trip-to-cdc|title=Trump Visits CDC After Coronavirus Fears Throw Schedule Into Chaos|date=March 6, 2020|work=[[NPR]]|access-date=March 7, 2020}}</ref> During his oval office address on March 11, Trump announced an imminent travel ban between Europe and the U.S. The announcement caused chaos in European and American airports, as Americans abroad scrambled to get flights back to the U.S. The administration later had to clarify that the travel ban applied to foreigners coming from the [[Schengen Area]], and later added Ireland and the UK to the list.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Specia|first=Megan|date=March 12, 2020|title=What You Need to Know About Trump's European Travel Ban|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/europe/trump-travel-ban-coronavirus.html|access-date=March 28, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Snyder |first=Tanya |title=White House adds U.K., Ireland to travel ban, hints at airline aid |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/14/white-house-adds-uk-ireland-to-travel-ban-129470 |date=March 14, 2020 |access-date=March 28, 2020 |website=[[Politico]]}}</ref> Previously, in late January 2020, the administration banned travel to the U.S. from China; prior to the decision, major U.S. carriers had already announced that they would no longer fly to and from China.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Tate|first=Curtis|title=Delta, American, United to suspend all China mainland flights as coronavirus crisis grows|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/2020/01/31/coronavirus-china-flight-ban-delta-cuts-all-flights-white-house/4620989002/ |date=January 31, 2020 |access-date=April 3, 2020|website=[[USA Today]]}}</ref> On March 13, Trump designated COVID-19 pandemic as a [[national emergency]], as the number of known cases of COVID-19 in the country exceeded 1,500, while known deaths exceeded 40.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Politi|first1=James|last2=Kuchler|first2=Hannah|date=March 14, 2020|title=Donald Trump declares US national emergency for coronavirus|work=[[Financial Times]]|url=https://www.ft.com/content/465543fa-655c-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5|access-date=March 18, 2020}}</ref>
The [[White House Coronavirus Task Force]] was led by Vice President Mike Pence, Coronavirus Response Coordinator [[Deborah Birx]], and Trump's son-in-law [[Jared Kushner]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Shear|first1=Michael|last2=Weiland|first2=Noah|last3=Rogers|first3=Katie|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/26/us/politics/trump-coronavirus-cdc.html|title=Trump Names Mike Pence to Lead Coronavirus Response|date=February 26, 2020|work=The New York Times|access-date=February 27, 2020|archive-url=https://archive.today/20200227003735/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/26/us/politics/trump-coronavirus-cdc.html|archive-date=February 27, 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> Congress appropriated $8.3{{spaces}}billion in emergency funding, which Trump signed into [[Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act|law]] on March 6.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Keith|first=Tamara|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/03/06/812825943/trump-signs-coronavirus-funding-bill-cancels-trip-to-cdc|title=Trump Visits CDC After Coronavirus Fears Throw Schedule Into Chaos|date=March 6, 2020|work=[[NPR]]|access-date=March 7, 2020}}</ref> During his oval office address on March 11, Trump announced an imminent travel ban between Europe and the U.S. The announcement caused chaos in European and American airports, as Americans abroad scrambled to get flights back to the U.S. The administration later had to clarify that the travel ban applied to foreigners coming from the [[Schengen Area]], and later added Ireland and the UK to the list.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Specia|first=Megan|date=March 12, 2020|title=What You Need to Know About Trump's European Travel Ban|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/europe/trump-travel-ban-coronavirus.html|access-date=March 28, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Snyder |first=Tanya |title=White House adds U.K., Ireland to travel ban, hints at airline aid |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/14/white-house-adds-uk-ireland-to-travel-ban-129470 |date=March 14, 2020 |access-date=March 28, 2020 |website=[[Politico]]}}</ref> Previously, in late January 2020, the administration banned travel to the U.S. from China; prior to the decision, major U.S. carriers had already announced that they would no longer fly to and from China.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Tate|first=Curtis|title=Delta, American, United to suspend all China mainland flights as coronavirus crisis grows|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/2020/01/31/coronavirus-china-flight-ban-delta-cuts-all-flights-white-house/4620989002/ |date=January 31, 2020 |access-date=April 3, 2020|website=USA Today}}</ref> On March 13, Trump designated COVID-19 pandemic as a [[national emergency]], as the number of known cases of COVID-19 in the country exceeded 1,500, while known deaths exceeded 40.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Politi|first1=James|last2=Kuchler|first2=Hannah|date=March 14, 2020|title=Donald Trump declares US national emergency for coronavirus|work=[[Financial Times]]|url=https://www.ft.com/content/465543fa-655c-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5|access-date=March 18, 2020}}</ref>


Although the U.S. government was initially quick to develop a diagnostic test for COVID-19, U.S. [[COVID-19 testing]] efforts from mid-January to late-February lost pace compared to the rest of the world.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-testing-specialrep-idUSKBN2153BW |first1=Toluse |last1=Olorunnipa |first2=Griff |last2=Witte |first3=Lenny |last3=Bernstein |title=Special Report: How Korea trounced U.S. in race to test people for coronavirus|date=March 18, 2020 |work=Reuters |access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref> ABC News described the testing as "shockingly slow".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-responsible-testing-problems-things/story?id=69590286 |date=March 14, 2020 |first=Anne |last=Flaherty |title=Trump says he's not responsible for testing problems: 3 things to know|website=ABC News|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref> When the WHO distributed 1.4 million COVID-19 tests in February, the U.S. chose instead to use its own tests. At that time, the CDC had produced 160,000 COVID-19 tests, but many were defective. As a result, fewer than 4,000 tests were done in the U.S. by February 27, with U.S. state laboratories conducting only about 200. In this period, academic laboratories and hospitals had developed their own tests, but were not allowed to use them until February 29, when the [[Food and Drug Administration]] issued approvals for them and private companies.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Whoriskey|first1=Peter|last2=Satija|first2=Neena|title=How U.S. coronavirus testing stalled: Flawed tests, red tape and resistance to using the millions of tests produced by the WHO|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/03/16/cdc-who-coronavirus-tests/|access-date=March 18, 2020|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=March 16, 2020}}</ref> A comprehensive ''New York Times'' investigation concluded that "technical flaws, regulatory hurdles, business-as-usual bureaucracies and lack of leadership at multiple levels" contributed to the testing failures.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Shear|first1=Michael D.|last2=Goodnough|first2=Abby|last3=Kaplan|first3=Sheila|last4=Fink|first4=Sheri|last5=Thomas|first5=Katie|last6=Weiland|first6=Noah|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/28/us/testing-coronavirus-pandemic.html|title=The Lost Month: How a Failure to Test Blinded the U.S. to Covid-19|date=March 28, 2020|work=The New York Times|access-date=March 28, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> An Associated Press investigation found the administration made its first bulk orders for vital health care equipment, such as [[N95 respirator]] masks and ventilators, in mid-March.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-health-us-news-ap-top-news-politics-090600c299a8cf07f5b44d92534856bc |title=U.S. 'wasted' months before preparing for virus pandemic |date=April 5, 2020 |last=Biesecker |first=Michael |work=Associated Press |access-date=April 5, 2020|url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200405130007/https://apnews.com/090600c299a8cf07f5b44d92534856bc |archive-date=April 5, 2020}}</ref>
Although the U.S. government was initially quick to develop a diagnostic test for COVID-19, U.S. [[COVID-19 testing]] efforts from mid-January to late-February lost pace compared to the rest of the world.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-testing-specialrep-idUSKBN2153BW |first1=Toluse |last1=Olorunnipa |first2=Griff |last2=Witte |first3=Lenny |last3=Bernstein |title=Special Report: How Korea trounced U.S. in race to test people for coronavirus|date=March 18, 2020 |work=Reuters |access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref> ABC News described the testing as "shockingly slow".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-responsible-testing-problems-things/story?id=69590286 |date=March 14, 2020 |first=Anne |last=Flaherty |title=Trump says he's not responsible for testing problems: 3 things to know|website=ABC News|access-date=March 19, 2020}}</ref> When the WHO distributed 1.4 million COVID-19 tests in February, the U.S. chose instead to use its own tests. At that time, the CDC had produced 160,000 COVID-19 tests, but many were defective. As a result, fewer than 4,000 tests were done in the U.S. by February 27, with U.S. state laboratories conducting only about 200. In this period, academic laboratories and hospitals had developed their own tests, but were not allowed to use them until February 29, when the [[Food and Drug Administration]] issued approvals for them and private companies.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Whoriskey|first1=Peter|last2=Satija|first2=Neena|title=How U.S. coronavirus testing stalled: Flawed tests, red tape and resistance to using the millions of tests produced by the WHO|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/03/16/cdc-who-coronavirus-tests/|access-date=March 18, 2020|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=March 16, 2020}}</ref> A comprehensive ''New York Times'' investigation concluded that "technical flaws, regulatory hurdles, business-as-usual bureaucracies and lack of leadership at multiple levels" contributed to the testing failures.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Shear|first1=Michael D.|last2=Goodnough|first2=Abby|last3=Kaplan|first3=Sheila|last4=Fink|first4=Sheri|last5=Thomas|first5=Katie|last6=Weiland|first6=Noah|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/28/us/testing-coronavirus-pandemic.html|title=The Lost Month: How a Failure to Test Blinded the U.S. to Covid-19|date=March 28, 2020|work=The New York Times|access-date=March 28, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> An Associated Press investigation found the administration made its first bulk orders for vital health care equipment, such as [[N95 respirator]] masks and ventilators, in mid-March.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-health-us-news-ap-top-news-politics-090600c299a8cf07f5b44d92534856bc |title=U.S. 'wasted' months before preparing for virus pandemic |date=April 5, 2020 |last=Biesecker |first=Michael |work=Associated Press |access-date=April 5, 2020|url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200405130007/https://apnews.com/090600c299a8cf07f5b44d92534856bc |archive-date=April 5, 2020}}</ref>
Line 448: Line 448:
[[File:Chad Wolf official portrait 2017.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Chad Wolf]], acting [[Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security]]]]
[[File:Chad Wolf official portrait 2017.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Chad Wolf]], acting [[Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security]]]]


Trump has repeatedly characterized [[Illegal immigration to the United States|illegal immigrants]] as criminals, although some studies have found they have lower crime and incarceration rates than native-born Americans.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/trump-immigration-borders-family-separation.html |first=Katie |last=Rogers |date=June 22, 2018 |title=Trump Highlights Immigrant Crime to Defend His Border Policy. Statistics Don't Back Him Up.|work=The New York Times|access-date=June 24, 2018}}</ref> Prior to taking office, Trump promised to deport the estimated eleven million illegal immigrants living in the United States and to build a [[Trump wall|wall]] along the [[Mexico–U.S. border]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Tareen|first=Sophia|title=Trump's election triggers flood of immigration questions|url=https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2016/1118/Trump-s-election-triggers-flood-of-immigration-questions |newspaper=[[Christian Science Monitor]] |date=November 18, 2016|access-date=November 18, 2016}}</ref> During his presidency, Trump reduced legal immigration substantially while the illegal immigrant population remained the same.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=January 20, 2021|title=President Trump Reduced Legal Immigration. He Did Not Reduce Illegal Immigration|url=https://www.cato.org/blog/president-trump-reduced-legal-immigration-he-did-not-reduce-illegal-immigration |first=Alex |last=Nowrasteh |access-date=January 21, 2021|website=Cato Institute}}</ref> The administration took several steps to limit the rights of legal immigrants, which included attempted revocations of [[Temporary Protected Status]] for Central American refugees,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Nakamura|first=David|date=August 16, 2017|title=Trump administration ends Obama-era protection program for Central American minors|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-administration-ends-obama-era-protection-program-for-central-american-minors/2017/08/16/8101507e-82b6-11e7-ab27-1a21a8e006ab_story.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> 60,000 Haitians (who emigrated following the [[2010 Haiti earthquake]]),<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Miroff|first=Nick|date=January 8, 2018|title=200,000 Salvadorans may be forced to leave the U.S. as Trump ends immigration protection|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-administration-to-end-provisional-residency-for-200000-salvadorans/2018/01/08/badfde90-f481-11e7-beb6-c8d48830c54d_story.html|access-date=January 8, 2018|issn=0190-8286}}</ref> and 200,000 Salvadorans (who emigrated following a series of devastating earthquakes in 2001)<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Jordan |first=Miriam |date=January 8, 2018 |title=Trump Administration Says That Nearly 200,000 Salvadorans Must Leave |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/08/us/salvadorans-tps-end.html |access-date=January 8, 2018 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> as well as making it illegal for refugees and asylum seekers,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Thomsen |first=Jacqueline |date=July 3, 2018 |title=Sessions rescinds DOJ guidance on refugees, asylum seekers' right to work |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]] |url=https://thehill.com/regulation/international/395440-sessions-rescinds-guidance-on-refugees-asylum-seekers-right-to-work |access-date=July 4, 2018}}</ref> and spouses of [[H-1B visa]] holders to work in the U.S.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Mullen|first=Jethro|title=Trump will stop spouses of H-1B visa holders from working |work=[[CNN Business]] |url=https://money.cnn.com/2017/12/15/technology/h1b-visa-spouses-h4-trump/index.html |date=December 15, 2017 |access-date=December 15, 2017}}</ref> A federal judge blocked the administration's attempt to deport the TPS recipients, citing what the judge said was Trump's racial "animus against non-white, non-European immigrants".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Federal judge blocks Trump from deporting hundreds of thousands of immigrants under TPS|work=[[USA Today]]|url=https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2018/10/03/judge-blocks-trump-administration-deporting-immigrants-under-tps/1517268002/ |date=October 3, 2018 |first=Alan |last=Gomez |access-date=October 4, 2018}}</ref> The administration slashed refugee admissions to record low levels (since the modern program began in 1980).<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=September 27, 2019|title=US slashes refugee limit to all-time low of 18,000|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49847906 |access-date=November 10, 2021 |work=[[BBC News]]}}</ref> The administration made it harder non-citizens who served in the military to receive necessary paperwork to pursue U.S. citizenship.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Copp|first=Tara|date=May 3, 2018|title=Naturalizations drop 65 percent for service members seeking citizenship after Mattis memo|work=Military Times|url=https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2018/05/03/naturalizations-drop-65-percent-for-service-members-seeking-citizenship-after-mattis-memo|access-date=May 4, 2018}}</ref> The administration's key legislative proposal on immigration was the 2017 [[RAISE Act]], a proposal to reduce legal immigration levels to the U.S. by fifty percent by halving the number of [[Permanent residence (United States)|green cards]] issued, capping [[refugee]] admissions at 50,000 a year and ending the [[Diversity Immigrant Visa|visa diversity lottery]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Harold |last=Brubaker |date=August 10, 2017 |title=Wharton study: Immigration proposal will lead to less economic growth and fewer jobs |work=Philadelphia Daily News |url=https://www.inquirer.com/philly/business/wharton-study-immigration-proposal-will-lead-to-less-economic-growth-and-fewer-jobs-20170810.html |access-date=August 11, 2017}}</ref> In 2020, the Trump administration set the lowest cap for refugees in the modern history of the United States for the subsequent year: 15,000 refugees.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=Susan |last1=Heavey |first2=Ted |last2=Hesson |first3=Kristina |last3=Cooke |first4=Mimi |last4=Dwyer |first5=Mica |last5=Rosenberg |date=October 28, 2020|title=Trump administration sets record low limit for new U.S. refugees|work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-refugees-idUSKBN27D1TS|access-date=April 23, 2021}}</ref> The administration increased fees for citizen applications, as well as caused delays in the processing of citizen applications.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=May 25, 2021|title=Citizenship agency eyes improved service without plan to pay|url=https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-voter-registration-lifestyle-travel-immigration-1c0554d5d141776722c64f5deadbad8d |first1=Elliot |last1=Spagat |first2=Sophia |last2=Tareen |access-date=June 20, 2021|website=Associated Press}}</ref>
Trump has repeatedly characterized [[Illegal immigration to the United States|illegal immigrants]] as criminals, although some studies have found they have lower crime and incarceration rates than native-born Americans.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/trump-immigration-borders-family-separation.html |first=Katie |last=Rogers |date=June 22, 2018 |title=Trump Highlights Immigrant Crime to Defend His Border Policy. Statistics Don't Back Him Up.|work=The New York Times|access-date=June 24, 2018}}</ref> Prior to taking office, Trump promised to deport the estimated eleven million illegal immigrants living in the United States and to build a [[Trump wall|wall]] along the [[Mexico–U.S. border]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Tareen|first=Sophia|title=Trump's election triggers flood of immigration questions|url=https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2016/1118/Trump-s-election-triggers-flood-of-immigration-questions |newspaper=[[Christian Science Monitor]] |date=November 18, 2016|access-date=November 18, 2016}}</ref> During his presidency, Trump reduced legal immigration substantially while the illegal immigrant population remained the same.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=January 20, 2021|title=President Trump Reduced Legal Immigration. He Did Not Reduce Illegal Immigration|url=https://www.cato.org/blog/president-trump-reduced-legal-immigration-he-did-not-reduce-illegal-immigration |first=Alex |last=Nowrasteh |access-date=January 21, 2021|website=Cato Institute}}</ref> The administration took several steps to limit the rights of legal immigrants, which included attempted revocations of [[Temporary Protected Status]] for Central American refugees,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Nakamura|first=David|date=August 16, 2017|title=Trump administration ends Obama-era protection program for Central American minors|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-administration-ends-obama-era-protection-program-for-central-american-minors/2017/08/16/8101507e-82b6-11e7-ab27-1a21a8e006ab_story.html |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> 60,000 Haitians (who emigrated following the [[2010 Haiti earthquake]]),<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Miroff|first=Nick|date=January 8, 2018|title=200,000 Salvadorans may be forced to leave the U.S. as Trump ends immigration protection|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-administration-to-end-provisional-residency-for-200000-salvadorans/2018/01/08/badfde90-f481-11e7-beb6-c8d48830c54d_story.html|access-date=January 8, 2018|issn=0190-8286}}</ref> and 200,000 Salvadorans (who emigrated following a series of devastating earthquakes in 2001)<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Jordan |first=Miriam |date=January 8, 2018 |title=Trump Administration Says That Nearly 200,000 Salvadorans Must Leave |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/08/us/salvadorans-tps-end.html |access-date=January 8, 2018 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> as well as making it illegal for refugees and asylum seekers,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Thomsen |first=Jacqueline |date=July 3, 2018 |title=Sessions rescinds DOJ guidance on refugees, asylum seekers' right to work |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]] |url=https://thehill.com/regulation/international/395440-sessions-rescinds-guidance-on-refugees-asylum-seekers-right-to-work |access-date=July 4, 2018}}</ref> and spouses of [[H-1B visa]] holders to work in the U.S.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Mullen|first=Jethro|title=Trump will stop spouses of H-1B visa holders from working |work=[[CNN Business]] |url=https://money.cnn.com/2017/12/15/technology/h1b-visa-spouses-h4-trump/index.html |date=December 15, 2017 |access-date=December 15, 2017}}</ref> A federal judge blocked the administration's attempt to deport the TPS recipients, citing what the judge said was Trump's racial "animus against non-white, non-European immigrants".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Federal judge blocks Trump from deporting hundreds of thousands of immigrants under TPS|work=USA Today|url=https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2018/10/03/judge-blocks-trump-administration-deporting-immigrants-under-tps/1517268002/ |date=October 3, 2018 |first=Alan |last=Gomez |access-date=October 4, 2018}}</ref> The administration slashed refugee admissions to record low levels (since the modern program began in 1980).<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=September 27, 2019|title=US slashes refugee limit to all-time low of 18,000|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49847906 |access-date=November 10, 2021 |work=[[BBC News]]}}</ref> The administration made it harder non-citizens who served in the military to receive necessary paperwork to pursue U.S. citizenship.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Copp|first=Tara|date=May 3, 2018|title=Naturalizations drop 65 percent for service members seeking citizenship after Mattis memo|work=Military Times|url=https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2018/05/03/naturalizations-drop-65-percent-for-service-members-seeking-citizenship-after-mattis-memo|access-date=May 4, 2018}}</ref> The administration's key legislative proposal on immigration was the 2017 [[RAISE Act]], a proposal to reduce legal immigration levels to the U.S. by fifty percent by halving the number of [[Permanent residence (United States)|green cards]] issued, capping [[refugee]] admissions at 50,000 a year and ending the [[Diversity Immigrant Visa|visa diversity lottery]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Harold |last=Brubaker |date=August 10, 2017 |title=Wharton study: Immigration proposal will lead to less economic growth and fewer jobs |work=Philadelphia Daily News |url=https://www.inquirer.com/philly/business/wharton-study-immigration-proposal-will-lead-to-less-economic-growth-and-fewer-jobs-20170810.html |access-date=August 11, 2017}}</ref> In 2020, the Trump administration set the lowest cap for refugees in the modern history of the United States for the subsequent year: 15,000 refugees.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=Susan |last1=Heavey |first2=Ted |last2=Hesson |first3=Kristina |last3=Cooke |first4=Mimi |last4=Dwyer |first5=Mica |last5=Rosenberg |date=October 28, 2020|title=Trump administration sets record low limit for new U.S. refugees|work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-refugees-idUSKBN27D1TS|access-date=April 23, 2021}}</ref> The administration increased fees for citizen applications, as well as caused delays in the processing of citizen applications.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=May 25, 2021|title=Citizenship agency eyes improved service without plan to pay|url=https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-voter-registration-lifestyle-travel-immigration-1c0554d5d141776722c64f5deadbad8d |first1=Elliot |last1=Spagat |first2=Sophia |last2=Tareen |access-date=June 20, 2021|website=Associated Press}}</ref>


By February 2018, arrests of undocumented immigrants by ICE increased by forty percent during Trump's tenure. Arrests of noncriminal undocumented immigrants were twice as high as during Obama's final year in office. Arrests of undocumented immigrants with criminal convictions increased only slightly.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Miroff|first1=Nick|last2=Sacchetti|first2=Maria|date=February 11, 2018|title=Trump takes 'shackles' off ICE, which is slapping them on immigrants who thought they were safe|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-takes-shackles-off-ice-which-is-slapping-them-on-immigrants-who-thought-they-were-safe/2018/02/11/4bd5c164-083a-11e8-b48c-b07fea957bd5_story.html|access-date=February 12, 2018|issn=0190-8286}}</ref> In 2018, experts noted that the Trump administration's immigration policies had led to an increase in criminality and lawlessness along the U.S.–Mexico border, as asylum seekers prevented by U.S. authorities from filing for asylum had been preyed upon by human smugglers, organized crime and corrupt local law enforcement.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=Ray |last1=Sanchez |first2=Nick |last2=Valencia |first3=Tal |last3=Kopan |title=Trump's immigration policies were supposed to make the border safer. Experts say the opposite is happening. |date=July 20, 2018 |work=CNN|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/19/americas/trump-migration-border-smuggling/index.html|access-date=July 24, 2018}}</ref> To defend administration policies on immigration, the administration fudged data and presented intentionally misleading analyses of the costs associated with refugees (omitting data that showed net positive fiscal effects),<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump Administration Rejects Study Showing Positive Impact of Refugees|website=The New York Times|date=September 19, 2017|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/18/us/politics/refugees-revenue-cost-report-trump.html|access-date=June 25, 2018|last1=Davis|first1=Julie Hirschfeld|last2=Sengupta|first2=Somini}}</ref> as well as created the [[Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement]] to highlight crimes committed by undocumented immigrants (there is no evidence undocumented immigrants increase the U.S. crime rate).<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Lee|first=Michelle|date=March 1, 2017|title=Fact check: Trump claim on murders by unauthorized immigrants|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2017/live-updates/trump-white-house/real-time-fact-checking-and-analysis-of-trumps-address-to-congress/fact-check-trump-claim-on-murders-by-unauthorized-immigrants/|access-date=March 3, 2017}}</ref> In January 2018, Trump was widely criticized after referring to Haiti, El Salvador, and African nations in general as "shithole countries" at a bipartisan meeting on immigration. Multiple international leaders condemned his remarks as racist.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=African nations slam Trump's vulgar remarks as "racist"|work=[[NBC News]]|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/african-nations-slam-trump-s-vulgar-remarks-reprehensible-racist-n837486 |first=Erik |last=Ortiz |date=January 13, 2018 |access-date=January 15, 2018}}</ref>
By February 2018, arrests of undocumented immigrants by ICE increased by forty percent during Trump's tenure. Arrests of noncriminal undocumented immigrants were twice as high as during Obama's final year in office. Arrests of undocumented immigrants with criminal convictions increased only slightly.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Miroff|first1=Nick|last2=Sacchetti|first2=Maria|date=February 11, 2018|title=Trump takes 'shackles' off ICE, which is slapping them on immigrants who thought they were safe|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-takes-shackles-off-ice-which-is-slapping-them-on-immigrants-who-thought-they-were-safe/2018/02/11/4bd5c164-083a-11e8-b48c-b07fea957bd5_story.html|access-date=February 12, 2018|issn=0190-8286}}</ref> In 2018, experts noted that the Trump administration's immigration policies had led to an increase in criminality and lawlessness along the U.S.–Mexico border, as asylum seekers prevented by U.S. authorities from filing for asylum had been preyed upon by human smugglers, organized crime and corrupt local law enforcement.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=Ray |last1=Sanchez |first2=Nick |last2=Valencia |first3=Tal |last3=Kopan |title=Trump's immigration policies were supposed to make the border safer. Experts say the opposite is happening. |date=July 20, 2018 |work=CNN|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/19/americas/trump-migration-border-smuggling/index.html|access-date=July 24, 2018}}</ref> To defend administration policies on immigration, the administration fudged data and presented intentionally misleading analyses of the costs associated with refugees (omitting data that showed net positive fiscal effects),<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump Administration Rejects Study Showing Positive Impact of Refugees|website=The New York Times|date=September 19, 2017|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/18/us/politics/refugees-revenue-cost-report-trump.html|access-date=June 25, 2018|last1=Davis|first1=Julie Hirschfeld|last2=Sengupta|first2=Somini}}</ref> as well as created the [[Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement]] to highlight crimes committed by undocumented immigrants (there is no evidence undocumented immigrants increase the U.S. crime rate).<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Lee|first=Michelle|date=March 1, 2017|title=Fact check: Trump claim on murders by unauthorized immigrants|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2017/live-updates/trump-white-house/real-time-fact-checking-and-analysis-of-trumps-address-to-congress/fact-check-trump-claim-on-murders-by-unauthorized-immigrants/|access-date=March 3, 2017}}</ref> In January 2018, Trump was widely criticized after referring to Haiti, El Salvador, and African nations in general as "shithole countries" at a bipartisan meeting on immigration. Multiple international leaders condemned his remarks as racist.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=African nations slam Trump's vulgar remarks as "racist"|work=[[NBC News]]|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/african-nations-slam-trump-s-vulgar-remarks-reprehensible-racist-n837486 |first=Erik |last=Ortiz |date=January 13, 2018 |access-date=January 15, 2018}}</ref>


Upon taking office, Trump directed the DHS to begin work on a wall.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/25/donald-trump-sign-mexico-border-executive-order |first=David |last=Smith |access-date=November 10, 2021 |title=Trump signs order to begin Mexico border wall in immigration crackdown|newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |date=January 25, 2017}}</ref> An internal DHS report estimated Trump's wall would cost $21.6{{spaces}}billion and take 3.5 years to build (far higher than the Trump 2016 campaign's estimate ($12{{spaces}}billion) and the $15{{spaces}}billion estimate from Republican congressional leaders).<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-trump-immigration-wall-idINKBN15O2ZZ |date=February 9, 2017 |title=Trump border 'wall' to cost $21.6 billion, take 3.5 years to build: Homeland Security internal report|last=Ainsley|first=Julia Edwards|access-date=February 10, 2017|work=Reuters}}</ref> In a January 2017 phone call between Trump and Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto, Trump conceded that the U.S. would pay for the border wall, not Mexico as he promised during the campaign, and implored Nieto to stop saying publicly the Mexican government would not pay for the border wall.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/you-cannot-say-that-to-the-press-trump-urged-mexican-president-to-end-his-public-defiance-on-border-wall-transcript-reveals/2017/08/03/0c2c0a4e-7610-11e7-8f39-eeb7d3a2d304_story.html |first=Greg |last=Miller |date=November 10, 2021 |title=Trump urged Mexican president to end his public defiance on border wall, transcript reveals|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=August 3, 2017}}</ref> In January 2018, the administration proposed spending $18{{spaces}}billion over the next ten years on the wall, more than half of the $33{{spaces}}billion spending blueprint for border security.<ref name="Nixon-2018">{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/08/us/politics/trump-border-wall-funding-surveillance.html |title=To Pay for Wall, Trump Would Cut Proven Border Security Measures |last=Nixon |first=Ron |date=January 8, 2018 |work=The New York Times |access-date=January 9, 2018 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Trump's plan would reduce funding for border surveillance, radar technology, patrol boats and customs agents; experts and officials say these are more effective at curbing illegal immigration and preventing terrorism and smuggling than a border wall.<ref name="Nixon-2018" />
Upon taking office, Trump directed the DHS to begin work on a wall.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/25/donald-trump-sign-mexico-border-executive-order |first=David |last=Smith |access-date=November 10, 2021 |title=Trump signs order to begin Mexico border wall in immigration crackdown|newspaper=The Guardian |date=January 25, 2017}}</ref> An internal DHS report estimated Trump's wall would cost $21.6{{spaces}}billion and take 3.5 years to build (far higher than the Trump 2016 campaign's estimate ($12{{spaces}}billion) and the $15{{spaces}}billion estimate from Republican congressional leaders).<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-trump-immigration-wall-idINKBN15O2ZZ |date=February 9, 2017 |title=Trump border 'wall' to cost $21.6 billion, take 3.5 years to build: Homeland Security internal report|last=Ainsley|first=Julia Edwards|access-date=February 10, 2017|work=Reuters}}</ref> In a January 2017 phone call between Trump and Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto, Trump conceded that the U.S. would pay for the border wall, not Mexico as he promised during the campaign, and implored Nieto to stop saying publicly the Mexican government would not pay for the border wall.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/you-cannot-say-that-to-the-press-trump-urged-mexican-president-to-end-his-public-defiance-on-border-wall-transcript-reveals/2017/08/03/0c2c0a4e-7610-11e7-8f39-eeb7d3a2d304_story.html |first=Greg |last=Miller |date=November 10, 2021 |title=Trump urged Mexican president to end his public defiance on border wall, transcript reveals|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=August 3, 2017}}</ref> In January 2018, the administration proposed spending $18{{spaces}}billion over the next ten years on the wall, more than half of the $33{{spaces}}billion spending blueprint for border security.<ref name="Nixon-2018">{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/08/us/politics/trump-border-wall-funding-surveillance.html |title=To Pay for Wall, Trump Would Cut Proven Border Security Measures |last=Nixon |first=Ron |date=January 8, 2018 |work=The New York Times |access-date=January 9, 2018 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Trump's plan would reduce funding for border surveillance, radar technology, patrol boats and customs agents; experts and officials say these are more effective at curbing illegal immigration and preventing terrorism and smuggling than a border wall.<ref name="Nixon-2018" />


The administration sought to add a citizenship question to the [[2020 United States Census|2020 census]], which experts warned would likely result in severe undercounting of the population and faulty data,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/us/politics/census-citizenship-question-trump.html|title=Despite Concerns, Census Will Ask Respondents if They Are U.S. Citizens|last=Baumgaertner|first=Emily|date=March 26, 2018|work=The New York Times|access-date=March 27, 2018|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> with naturalized U.S. citizens, legal immigrants, and undocumented immigrants all being less likely to respond to the census.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Holly |last=Straut-Eppsteiner |access-date=November 10, 2021 |url=https://www.nilc.org/2019/04/22/citizenship-question-would-undermine-census-reliability/ |publisher=National Immigration Law Center |title=Research Shows a Citizenship Question Would Suppress Participation among Latinxs and Immigrants in the 2020 Census, Undermining Its Reliability |date=April 22, 2019 |quote=Researchers uncovered a significant and troubling finding from this survey research: Fewer Latinx immigrant households will participate in the 2020 census if the question is implemented, which will result in an undercount. Without the citizenship question, 84 percent of respondents were willing to participate in the census; after including the citizenship question, however, willingness to participate dropped by almost half, to 46 percent. Willingness dropped among individuals across legal status: naturalized citizens, legal residents, and undocumented individuals.}}</ref> [[Blue states]] were estimated to get fewer congressional seats and lower congressional appropriations than they would otherwise get, because they have larger non-citizen populations.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/27/politics/blue-states-lose-citizenship-question-census/index.html |date=March 27, 2018 |title=Blue states are far more likely to lose money and power over Census citizenship question|last=Enten|first=Harry|work=CNN|access-date=March 27, 2018}}</ref> [[Thomas B. Hofeller]], an architect of Republican gerrymandering, had found adding the census question would help to gerrymander maps that "would be advantageous to Republicans and non-Hispanic whites" and that Hofeller had later written the key portion of a letter from the Trump administration's Justice Department justifying the addition of a citizenship question by claiming it was needed to enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/us/census-citizenship-question-hofeller.html |title=Deceased G.O.P. Strategist's Hard Drives Reveal New Details on the Census Citizenship Question |first=Michael |last=Wines |date=May 30, 2019 |newspaper=The New York Times |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> In July 2019, the Supreme Court in ''[[Department of Commerce v. New York]]'' blocked the administration from including the citizenship question on the census form.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump abandons effort to add citizenship question to census |work=[[Politico]] |first1=Anita |last1=Kumar |first2=Caitlin |last2=Oprysko |date=July 11, 2019 |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/11/trump-expected-to-take-executive-action-to-add-citizenship-question-to-census-1405893 |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref>
The administration sought to add a citizenship question to the [[2020 United States Census|2020 census]], which experts warned would likely result in severe undercounting of the population and faulty data,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/us/politics/census-citizenship-question-trump.html|title=Despite Concerns, Census Will Ask Respondents if They Are U.S. Citizens|last=Baumgaertner|first=Emily|date=March 26, 2018|work=The New York Times|access-date=March 27, 2018|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> with naturalized U.S. citizens, legal immigrants, and undocumented immigrants all being less likely to respond to the census.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Holly |last=Straut-Eppsteiner |access-date=November 10, 2021 |url=https://www.nilc.org/2019/04/22/citizenship-question-would-undermine-census-reliability/ |publisher=National Immigration Law Center |title=Research Shows a Citizenship Question Would Suppress Participation among Latinxs and Immigrants in the 2020 Census, Undermining Its Reliability |date=April 22, 2019 |quote=Researchers uncovered a significant and troubling finding from this survey research: Fewer Latinx immigrant households will participate in the 2020 census if the question is implemented, which will result in an undercount. Without the citizenship question, 84 percent of respondents were willing to participate in the census; after including the citizenship question, however, willingness to participate dropped by almost half, to 46 percent. Willingness dropped among individuals across legal status: naturalized citizens, legal residents, and undocumented individuals.}}</ref> [[Blue states]] were estimated to get fewer congressional seats and lower congressional appropriations than they would otherwise get, because they have larger non-citizen populations.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/27/politics/blue-states-lose-citizenship-question-census/index.html |date=March 27, 2018 |title=Blue states are far more likely to lose money and power over Census citizenship question|last=Enten|first=Harry|work=CNN|access-date=March 27, 2018}}</ref> [[Thomas B. Hofeller]], an architect of Republican gerrymandering, had found adding the census question would help to gerrymander maps that "would be advantageous to Republicans and non-Hispanic whites" and that Hofeller had later written the key portion of a letter from the Trump administration's Justice Department justifying the addition of a citizenship question by claiming it was needed to enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/us/census-citizenship-question-hofeller.html |title=Deceased G.O.P. Strategist's Hard Drives Reveal New Details on the Census Citizenship Question |first=Michael |last=Wines |date=May 30, 2019 |newspaper=The New York Times |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref> In July 2019, the Supreme Court in ''[[Department of Commerce v. New York]]'' blocked the administration from including the citizenship question on the census form.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump abandons effort to add citizenship question to census |work=[[Politico]] |first1=Anita |last1=Kumar |first2=Caitlin |last2=Oprysko |date=July 11, 2019 |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/11/trump-expected-to-take-executive-action-to-add-citizenship-question-to-census-1405893 |access-date=November 10, 2021}}</ref>
Line 477: Line 477:
A [[Executive Order 13780|new executive order]] was signed in March which limited travel to the U.S. from six different countries for 90 days, and by all refugees who do not possess either a visa or valid travel documents for 120 days.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/06/donald-trump-travel-ban-nigeria-executive-order/|title=Donald Trump's travel ban: President facing new legal threat as FBI investigate 300 refugees for links to Isil|last=Alexander|first=Harriet|date=March 7, 2017|access-date=June 26, 2017|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph}}</ref> The new executive order revoked and replaced the executive order issued in January.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/06/politics/trump-new-travel-ban-executive-order-full-text/index.html |title=Trump travel ban: Read the full executive order|date=March 6, 2017|access-date=June 26, 2017|work=CNN}}</ref>
A [[Executive Order 13780|new executive order]] was signed in March which limited travel to the U.S. from six different countries for 90 days, and by all refugees who do not possess either a visa or valid travel documents for 120 days.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/06/donald-trump-travel-ban-nigeria-executive-order/|title=Donald Trump's travel ban: President facing new legal threat as FBI investigate 300 refugees for links to Isil|last=Alexander|first=Harriet|date=March 7, 2017|access-date=June 26, 2017|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph}}</ref> The new executive order revoked and replaced the executive order issued in January.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/06/politics/trump-new-travel-ban-executive-order-full-text/index.html |title=Trump travel ban: Read the full executive order|date=March 6, 2017|access-date=June 26, 2017|work=CNN}}</ref>


In June, the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] partially [[Stay of execution|stayed]] certain injunctions that were put on the order by two federal appeals courts earlier, allowing the executive order to mostly go into effect. In October, the Court dismissed the case, saying the orders had been replaced by a new proclamation, so challenges to the previous executive orders are moot.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/10/10/victory-trump-supreme-court-dismisses-travel-ban-case/752401001/|title=In victory for Trump, Supreme Court dismisses travel ban case|last1=Wolf|first1=Richard|last2=Korte|first2=Gregory|work=[[USA Today]]|date=October 10, 2017|access-date=October 20, 2017}}</ref>
In June, the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] partially [[Stay of execution|stayed]] certain injunctions that were put on the order by two federal appeals courts earlier, allowing the executive order to mostly go into effect. In October, the Court dismissed the case, saying the orders had been replaced by a new proclamation, so challenges to the previous executive orders are moot.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/10/10/victory-trump-supreme-court-dismisses-travel-ban-case/752401001/|title=In victory for Trump, Supreme Court dismisses travel ban case|last1=Wolf|first1=Richard|last2=Korte|first2=Gregory|work=USA Today|date=October 10, 2017|access-date=October 20, 2017}}</ref>


In September, Trump signed a proclamation placing limits on the six countries in the second executive order and added [[Chad]], [[North Korea]], and [[Venezuela]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.lawfaremedia.org/white-house-updates-travel-ban-summary|title=White House Updates to the Travel Ban: A Summary|first=Russell|last=Spivak|publisher=[[Lawfare (website)|Lawfare]]|location=[[Washington, D.C.]]|date=September 25, 2017|access-date=October 19, 2017}}</ref> In October 2017, Judge [[Derrick Watson]], of the [[United States District Court for the District of Hawaii|U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii]] issued another temporary [[restraining order]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-judge-blocks-trumps-third-travel-ban/2017/10/17/e73293fc-ae90-11e7-9e58-e6288544af98_story.html|title=Federal judge blocks Trump's third travel ban|first=Matt|last=Zapotosky|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|location=[[Washington, D.C.]]|date=October 17, 2017|access-date=October 19, 2017}}</ref> In December 2017, the Supreme Court allowed the September 2017 travel restrictions to go into effect while legal challenges in Hawaii and Maryland are heard. The decision effectively barred most citizens of Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea from entry into the United States along with some government officials from Venezuela and their families.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/04/us/politics/trump-travel-ban-supreme-court.html|newspaper=The New York Times|title=Supreme Court Allows Trump Travel Ban to Take Effect|last=Liptak|first=Adam|date=December 4, 2017|access-date=December 5, 2017}}</ref>
In September, Trump signed a proclamation placing limits on the six countries in the second executive order and added [[Chad]], [[North Korea]], and [[Venezuela]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.lawfaremedia.org/white-house-updates-travel-ban-summary|title=White House Updates to the Travel Ban: A Summary|first=Russell|last=Spivak|publisher=[[Lawfare (website)|Lawfare]]|location=[[Washington, D.C.]]|date=September 25, 2017|access-date=October 19, 2017}}</ref> In October 2017, Judge [[Derrick Watson]], of the [[United States District Court for the District of Hawaii|U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii]] issued another temporary [[restraining order]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-judge-blocks-trumps-third-travel-ban/2017/10/17/e73293fc-ae90-11e7-9e58-e6288544af98_story.html|title=Federal judge blocks Trump's third travel ban|first=Matt|last=Zapotosky|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|location=[[Washington, D.C.]]|date=October 17, 2017|access-date=October 19, 2017}}</ref> In December 2017, the Supreme Court allowed the September 2017 travel restrictions to go into effect while legal challenges in Hawaii and Maryland are heard. The decision effectively barred most citizens of Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea from entry into the United States along with some government officials from Venezuela and their families.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/04/us/politics/trump-travel-ban-supreme-court.html|newspaper=The New York Times|title=Supreme Court Allows Trump Travel Ban to Take Effect|last=Liptak|first=Adam|date=December 4, 2017|access-date=December 5, 2017}}</ref>


In January 2020, Trump added [[Nigeria]], [[Myanmar]], [[Eritrea]], [[Kyrgyzstan]], [[Sudan]], and [[Tanzania]] to the visa ban list.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/trump-admin-expands-travel-ban-new-restrictions-six-countries-n1127841 |first1=Adiel |last1=Kaplan |first2=Daniella |last2=Silva |title=Trump admin expands travel ban with new restrictions for six countries |website=[[NBC News]] |date=January 31, 2020 |access-date=March 2, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/01/31/trump-expands-controversial-travel-ban-six-new-countries/4620473002/ |first=David |last=Jackson |title=Trump expands controversial travel ban restrictions to six new countries |website=[[USA Today]] |date=January 31, 2020 |access-date=March 2, 2020}}</ref>
In January 2020, Trump added [[Nigeria]], [[Myanmar]], [[Eritrea]], [[Kyrgyzstan]], [[Sudan]], and [[Tanzania]] to the visa ban list.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/trump-admin-expands-travel-ban-new-restrictions-six-countries-n1127841 |first1=Adiel |last1=Kaplan |first2=Daniella |last2=Silva |title=Trump admin expands travel ban with new restrictions for six countries |website=[[NBC News]] |date=January 31, 2020 |access-date=March 2, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/01/31/trump-expands-controversial-travel-ban-six-new-countries/4620473002/ |first=David |last=Jackson |title=Trump expands controversial travel ban restrictions to six new countries |website=USA Today |date=January 31, 2020 |access-date=March 2, 2020}}</ref>


Amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, Trump further restricted travel from Iran on February 29, 2020, and advised American citizens not to travel to specific regions in Italy and South Korea in response to COVID-19.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Vella|first=Lauren|title=Trump announces new travel restrictions amid spread of coronavirus|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/485295-trump-administration-announces-new-travel-restrictions-amid-spread-of|website=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|access-date=April 26, 2020|date=February 29, 2020}}</ref> In March 2020, the Trump administration later issued a ban on entrants from all [[Schengen Area]] countries, eventually including [[Ireland]] and the UK.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Haltiwanger|first=John|title=Trump's coronavirus travel ban initially excluded countries where he has golf courses struggling for business|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-trump-europe-travel-ban-exclude-uk-ireland-golf-courses-2020-3 |access-date=March 22, 2020|work=[[Business Insider]]|date=March 14, 2020}}</ref>
Amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, Trump further restricted travel from Iran on February 29, 2020, and advised American citizens not to travel to specific regions in Italy and South Korea in response to COVID-19.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Vella|first=Lauren|title=Trump announces new travel restrictions amid spread of coronavirus|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/485295-trump-administration-announces-new-travel-restrictions-amid-spread-of|website=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|access-date=April 26, 2020|date=February 29, 2020}}</ref> In March 2020, the Trump administration later issued a ban on entrants from all [[Schengen Area]] countries, eventually including [[Ireland]] and the UK.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Haltiwanger|first=John|title=Trump's coronavirus travel ban initially excluded countries where he has golf courses struggling for business|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-trump-europe-travel-ban-exclude-uk-ireland-golf-courses-2020-3 |access-date=March 22, 2020|work=[[Business Insider]]|date=March 14, 2020}}</ref>
Line 496: Line 496:
{{See also|LGBT rights in the United States}}
{{See also|LGBT rights in the United States}}


The administration rolled back numerous LGBT protections, in particular those implemented during the Obama administration, covering issues such as health care, education, employment, housing, military, and criminal justice, as well as foster care and adoption.<ref name="Berg-2019">{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://projects.propublica.org/graphics/lgbtq-rights-rollback|title=Under Trump, LGBTQ Progress Is Being Reversed in Plain Sight|last1=Berg|first1=Kirsten|last2=Syed|first2=Moiz|website=ProPublica|access-date=December 24, 2019|date=November 22, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/03/trump-attack-lgbt-rights-supreme-court|title='A critical point in history': how Trump's attack on LGBT rights is escalating|last=Levin|first=Sam|date=September 3, 2019|work=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=December 24, 2019|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> The administration rescinded rules prohibiting taxpayer-funded adoption and foster care agencies from discriminating against LGBT adoption and foster parents.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||title=In 'nasty parting shot,' HHS finalizes rule axing LGBTQ nondiscrimination protections|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/nasty-parting-shot-hhs-finalizes-rule-axing-lgbtq-nondiscrimination-protections-n1253959 |first=Dan |last=Avery |date=January 12, 2021 |access-date=January 20, 2021|website=[[NBC News]]}}</ref> The Department of Justice reversed its position on whether the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964|Civil Rights Act]]'s workplace protections covered LGBT individuals and argued in state and federal courts for a constitutional right for businesses to discriminate on the basis of [[sexual orientation]] and [[gender identity]].<ref name="Berg-2019" /> The administration exempted government contractors from following federal workplace discrimination rules, as long as they could cite religious reasons for doing so.<ref name="Berg-2019" />
The administration rolled back numerous LGBT protections, in particular those implemented during the Obama administration, covering issues such as health care, education, employment, housing, military, and criminal justice, as well as foster care and adoption.<ref name="Berg-2019">{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://projects.propublica.org/graphics/lgbtq-rights-rollback|title=Under Trump, LGBTQ Progress Is Being Reversed in Plain Sight|last1=Berg|first1=Kirsten|last2=Syed|first2=Moiz|website=ProPublica|access-date=December 24, 2019|date=November 22, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/03/trump-attack-lgbt-rights-supreme-court|title='A critical point in history': how Trump's attack on LGBT rights is escalating|last=Levin|first=Sam|date=September 3, 2019|work=The Guardian|access-date=December 24, 2019|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> The administration rescinded rules prohibiting taxpayer-funded adoption and foster care agencies from discriminating against LGBT adoption and foster parents.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||title=In 'nasty parting shot,' HHS finalizes rule axing LGBTQ nondiscrimination protections|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/nasty-parting-shot-hhs-finalizes-rule-axing-lgbtq-nondiscrimination-protections-n1253959 |first=Dan |last=Avery |date=January 12, 2021 |access-date=January 20, 2021|website=[[NBC News]]}}</ref> The Department of Justice reversed its position on whether the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964|Civil Rights Act]]'s workplace protections covered LGBT individuals and argued in state and federal courts for a constitutional right for businesses to discriminate on the basis of [[sexual orientation]] and [[gender identity]].<ref name="Berg-2019" /> The administration exempted government contractors from following federal workplace discrimination rules, as long as they could cite religious reasons for doing so.<ref name="Berg-2019" />


The administration rescinded a directive that public schools treat students according to their gender identity.<ref name="Berg-2019" /> The administration rescinded a federal policy that allowed transgender students to use bathrooms corresponding to their gender identity, and dropped a lawsuit against [[North Carolina]]'s "bathroom bill".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/us/politics/devos-sessions-transgender-students-rights.html |first1=Jeremy W. |last1=Peters |first2=Jo |last2=Becker |first3=Julie Hirschfeld |last3=Davis |title=Trump Rescinds Rules on Bathrooms for Transgender Students|date=February 22, 2017|website=The New York Times|access-date=March 16, 2017|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170315213910/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/us/politics/devos-sessions-transgender-students-rights.html|archive-date=March 15, 2017}}</ref> The administration rescinded rules that prohibited discrimination against LGBT patients by health care providers.<ref name="Berg-2019" /><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/24/transgender-patients-protections-health-care-1343005 |date=May 24, 2019 |title=Trump administration rolls back health care protections for LGBTQ patients|last1=Diamond|first1=Dan|last2=Pradhan|first2=Rachana|website=[[Politico]]|access-date=May 31, 2019}}</ref> Rules were rescinded to give transgender homeless people equal access to homeless shelters, and to house transgender prison inmates according to their gender identity "when appropriate".<ref name="Berg-2019" /> HHS stopped collecting information on LGBT participants in its national survey of older adults,<ref name="TrumpRecordAgainstTrans">{{citation |url = https://transequality.org/the-discrimination-administration |title = Trump's record of action against transgender people |date = April 20, 2017 |publisher = transequality.org |access-date = February 20, 2019 |url-status = live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190220231746/https://transequality.org/the-discrimination-administration |archive-date = February 20, 2019}}</ref> and the [[Census Bureau]] removed "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" as proposed subjects for possible inclusion on the decennial census or [[American Community Survey]].<ref name="TrumpRecordAgainstTrans" /> The Justice Department and [[United States Labor Department|Labor Department]] cancelled quarterly conference calls with LGBT organizations.<ref name="TrumpRecordAgainstTrans" />
The administration rescinded a directive that public schools treat students according to their gender identity.<ref name="Berg-2019" /> The administration rescinded a federal policy that allowed transgender students to use bathrooms corresponding to their gender identity, and dropped a lawsuit against [[North Carolina]]'s "bathroom bill".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/us/politics/devos-sessions-transgender-students-rights.html |first1=Jeremy W. |last1=Peters |first2=Jo |last2=Becker |first3=Julie Hirschfeld |last3=Davis |title=Trump Rescinds Rules on Bathrooms for Transgender Students|date=February 22, 2017|website=The New York Times|access-date=March 16, 2017|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170315213910/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/us/politics/devos-sessions-transgender-students-rights.html|archive-date=March 15, 2017}}</ref> The administration rescinded rules that prohibited discrimination against LGBT patients by health care providers.<ref name="Berg-2019" /><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/24/transgender-patients-protections-health-care-1343005 |date=May 24, 2019 |title=Trump administration rolls back health care protections for LGBTQ patients|last1=Diamond|first1=Dan|last2=Pradhan|first2=Rachana|website=[[Politico]]|access-date=May 31, 2019}}</ref> Rules were rescinded to give transgender homeless people equal access to homeless shelters, and to house transgender prison inmates according to their gender identity "when appropriate".<ref name="Berg-2019" /> HHS stopped collecting information on LGBT participants in its national survey of older adults,<ref name="TrumpRecordAgainstTrans">{{citation |url = https://transequality.org/the-discrimination-administration |title = Trump's record of action against transgender people |date = April 20, 2017 |publisher = transequality.org |access-date = February 20, 2019 |url-status = live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190220231746/https://transequality.org/the-discrimination-administration |archive-date = February 20, 2019}}</ref> and the [[Census Bureau]] removed "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" as proposed subjects for possible inclusion on the decennial census or [[American Community Survey]].<ref name="TrumpRecordAgainstTrans" /> The Justice Department and [[United States Labor Department|Labor Department]] cancelled quarterly conference calls with LGBT organizations.<ref name="TrumpRecordAgainstTrans" />
Line 519: Line 519:
}}
}}


In response to the 2020 rioting and looting amid [[2020–2022 United States racial unrest|nationwide protests]] against racism and police brutality after a white [[Minneapolis Police Department]] officer [[Murder of George Floyd|murdered]] an African American man named [[George Floyd]], Trump tweeted a quote, "[[when the looting starts, the shooting starts]]", coined in 1967 by a Miami police chief that has been widely condemned by civil rights groups.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Wines|first=Michael|date=May 29, 2020|title='Looting' Comment From Trump Dates Back to Racial Unrest of the 1960s|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/29/us/looting-starts-shooting-starts.html|access-date=May 30, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref name="Milman-2020">{{#invoke:Cite web||title=Trump praises Secret Service and threatens protesters with 'vicious dogs'|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/30/trump-secret-service-george-floyd-protesters-white-house |first1=Oliver |last1=Milman |first2=Martin |last2=Pengelly |first3=Richard |last3=Luscombe |first4=David |last4=Smith |date=May 30, 2020|website=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=May 30, 2020}}</ref> Trump later addressed protestors outside the White House by saying they "would have been greeted with the most vicious dogs, and most ominous weapons, I have ever seen" if they breached the White House fence.<ref name="Milman-2020" />
In response to the 2020 rioting and looting amid [[2020–2022 United States racial unrest|nationwide protests]] against racism and police brutality after a white [[Minneapolis Police Department]] officer [[Murder of George Floyd|murdered]] an African American man named [[George Floyd]], Trump tweeted a quote, "[[when the looting starts, the shooting starts]]", coined in 1967 by a Miami police chief that has been widely condemned by civil rights groups.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Wines|first=Michael|date=May 29, 2020|title='Looting' Comment From Trump Dates Back to Racial Unrest of the 1960s|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/29/us/looting-starts-shooting-starts.html|access-date=May 30, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref name="Milman-2020">{{#invoke:Cite web||title=Trump praises Secret Service and threatens protesters with 'vicious dogs'|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/30/trump-secret-service-george-floyd-protesters-white-house |first1=Oliver |last1=Milman |first2=Martin |last2=Pengelly |first3=Richard |last3=Luscombe |first4=David |last4=Smith |date=May 30, 2020|website=The Guardian|access-date=May 30, 2020}}</ref> Trump later addressed protestors outside the White House by saying they "would have been greeted with the most vicious dogs, and most ominous weapons, I have ever seen" if they breached the White House fence.<ref name="Milman-2020" />


==== Photo-op at St. John's Episcopal Church ====
==== Photo-op at St. John's Episcopal Church ====
{{Main|Donald Trump photo op at St. John's Church}}
{{Main|Donald Trump photo op at St. John's Church}}
[[File:President Trump Visits St. John's Episcopal Church (49964436272) (cropped) (cropped).jpg|thumb|right|Trump returns to the White House after posing for a photo op at [[St. John's Episcopal Church, Lafayette Square|St. John's Episcopal Church]], June 2020.]]
[[File:President Trump Visits St. John's Episcopal Church (49964436272) (cropped) (cropped).jpg|thumb|right|Trump returns to the White House after posing for a photo op at [[St. John's Episcopal Church, Lafayette Square|St. John's Episcopal Church]], June 2020.]]
On June 1, 2020, hundreds of police officers, members of the [[National Guard (United States)|National Guard]] and other forces, in riot gear used smoke canisters, rubber bullets, batons and shields to disperse a crowd of peaceful protesters outside [[St. John's Episcopal Church, Lafayette Square|St. John's Episcopal Church]] across [[Lafayette Square, Washington, D.C.|Lafayette Square]] from the White House.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Rogers|first=Katie|date=June 1, 2020|title=Protesters Dispersed With Tear Gas So Trump Could Pose at Church|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/01/us/politics/trump-st-johns-church-bible.html|access-date=June 2, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Beauchamp|first=Zack|date=June 1, 2020|title=Officers fire tear gas on peaceful protesters to clear the way for Trump's photo op|url=https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/6/1/21277530/trump-speech-police-violence-dc-tear-gas|website=[[Vox (website)|Vox]]|access-date=June 2, 2020}}</ref> A news crew from Australia was attacked by these forces<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Hume|first=Tim|title=Australian Journalists Covering DC Protests Were Assaulted by Cops on Live Morning Television|url=https://www.vice.com/en_au/article/akzvzz/australian-journalists-covering-dc-protests-were-assaulted-by-cops-on-live-morning-television|work=[[Vice (magazine)|Vice]]|date=June 3, 2020|access-date=June 3, 2020}}</ref> and clergy on the church's porch suffered effects of the gas and were dispersed along with the others.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=June 1, 2020|title=Police Fire Tear Gas Outside White House Before Trump Speech|url=https://www.mediaite.com/tv/watch-police-fire-tear-gas-at-protesters-gathered-outside-the-white-house-as-trump-prepares-to-address-the-nation/ |first=KJ |last=Edelman |website=Mediaite|access-date=June 2, 2020}}</ref> Trump, accompanied by other officials including the secretary of defense, then walked across Lafayette Square and posed for pictures while he was holding a Bible up for the cameras, outside the church which had suffered minor damage from a fire started by arsonists the night before.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=McCreesh |first=Shawn |title=Protests Near White House Spiral Out of Control Again |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/31/us/politics/washington-dc-george-floyd-protests.html |work=The New York Times |date=June 1, 2020|access-date=June 1, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/historic-church-near-white-house-damaged-amid-unrest-leaders-pray-for-healing/2318673/|title=Historic Church Near White House Damaged Amid Unrest; Leaders Pray for Healing|first=Sophia|last=Barnes|date=June 1, 2020|work=NBC 4 Washington|access-date=June 3, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Zoellner |first=Danielle |title='Here in New York, we read the Bible': Cuomo condemns Trump for his church photo op |website=[[The Independent]] |date=June 3, 2020 |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/cuomo-trump-bible-photo-new-york-coronavirus-a9547481.html |access-date=November 10, 2021 |quote='Is that your Bible?' a reporter is heard asking Mr Trump during the moment. He responded: 'It's a Bible.'}}</ref> [[Mariann Edgar Budde]], Bishop of the [[Episcopal Diocese of Washington]] said she was "outraged" by Trump's actions,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title='He Did Not Pray': Fallout Grows From Trump's Photo-Op At St. John's Church |newspaper=[[NPR]] |url=https://www.npr.org/2020/06/02/867705160/he-did-not-pray-fallout-grows-from-trump-s-photo-op-at-st-john-s-church |date=June 2, 2020 |first=Bill |last=Chappell |access-date=June 2, 2020}}</ref> which also received widespread condemnation from other religious leaders.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Jackson|first1=David|last2=Collins|first2=Michael|last3=Wu|first3=Nicholas|title=Washington archbishop denounces Trump visit to Catholic shrine as 'baffling' and 'reprehensible'|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/06/02/george-floyd-trump-visit-catholic-shrine-amid-photo-op-criticism/3122549001/|access-date=June 2, 2020|work=[[USA Today]]|publisher=[[Gannett]]|date=June 2, 2020|location=[[McLean, Virginia]]}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=George Floyd death: Archbishop attacks Trump as US unrest continues|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52897303|access-date=June 2, 2020|work=[[BBC News]]|publisher=[[BBC]]|date=June 2, 2020|location=[[London]]}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Outraged Episcopal leaders condemn tear-gassing clergy, protesters for Trump photo op at Washington church |url=https://www.episcopalnewsservice.org/2020/06/02/episcopal-leaders-express-outrage-condemn-tear-gassing-protesters-for-trump-photo-op-at-washington-church/ |first=Egan |last=Millard |website=Episcopal News Service |access-date=June 3, 2020 |date=June 2, 2020}}</ref> However, the reaction from the religious right and evangelicals generally praised the visit.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/06/trumps-biblical-spectacle-outside-st-johns-church/612529/ |last=Coppins |first=McKay |title=The Christians Who Loved Trump's Stunt |website=[[The Atlantic]] |date=June 2, 2020|access-date=June 4, 2020|quote="I thought it was completely appropriate for the president to stand in front of that church," Jeffress told me. "And by holding up the Bible, he was showing us that it teaches that, yes, God hates racism, it's despicable{{snd}}but God also hates lawlessness."}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/christian-right-leaders-loved-trumps-bible-photo-op.html|title=Christian Right Leaders Loved Trump's Bible Photo Op|website=[[New York (magazine)|New York]] |last=Kilgore|first=Ed|date=June 2, 2020|access-date=June 4, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/03/donald-trump-church-photo-op-evangelicals|title='He wears the armor of God': evangelicals hail Trump's church photo op |website=[[The Guardian]] |last=Teague |first=Matthew |date=June 3, 2020|access-date=June 4, 2020}}</ref>
On June 1, 2020, hundreds of police officers, members of the [[National Guard (United States)|National Guard]] and other forces, in riot gear used smoke canisters, rubber bullets, batons and shields to disperse a crowd of peaceful protesters outside [[St. John's Episcopal Church, Lafayette Square|St. John's Episcopal Church]] across [[Lafayette Square, Washington, D.C.|Lafayette Square]] from the White House.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Rogers|first=Katie|date=June 1, 2020|title=Protesters Dispersed With Tear Gas So Trump Could Pose at Church|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/01/us/politics/trump-st-johns-church-bible.html|access-date=June 2, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Beauchamp|first=Zack|date=June 1, 2020|title=Officers fire tear gas on peaceful protesters to clear the way for Trump's photo op|url=https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/6/1/21277530/trump-speech-police-violence-dc-tear-gas|website=[[Vox (website)|Vox]]|access-date=June 2, 2020}}</ref> A news crew from Australia was attacked by these forces<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Hume|first=Tim|title=Australian Journalists Covering DC Protests Were Assaulted by Cops on Live Morning Television|url=https://www.vice.com/en_au/article/akzvzz/australian-journalists-covering-dc-protests-were-assaulted-by-cops-on-live-morning-television|work=[[Vice (magazine)|Vice]]|date=June 3, 2020|access-date=June 3, 2020}}</ref> and clergy on the church's porch suffered effects of the gas and were dispersed along with the others.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||date=June 1, 2020|title=Police Fire Tear Gas Outside White House Before Trump Speech|url=https://www.mediaite.com/tv/watch-police-fire-tear-gas-at-protesters-gathered-outside-the-white-house-as-trump-prepares-to-address-the-nation/ |first=KJ |last=Edelman |website=Mediaite|access-date=June 2, 2020}}</ref> Trump, accompanied by other officials including the secretary of defense, then walked across Lafayette Square and posed for pictures while he was holding a Bible up for the cameras, outside the church which had suffered minor damage from a fire started by arsonists the night before.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=McCreesh |first=Shawn |title=Protests Near White House Spiral Out of Control Again |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/31/us/politics/washington-dc-george-floyd-protests.html |work=The New York Times |date=June 1, 2020|access-date=June 1, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/historic-church-near-white-house-damaged-amid-unrest-leaders-pray-for-healing/2318673/|title=Historic Church Near White House Damaged Amid Unrest; Leaders Pray for Healing|first=Sophia|last=Barnes|date=June 1, 2020|work=NBC 4 Washington|access-date=June 3, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Zoellner |first=Danielle |title='Here in New York, we read the Bible': Cuomo condemns Trump for his church photo op |website=[[The Independent]] |date=June 3, 2020 |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/cuomo-trump-bible-photo-new-york-coronavirus-a9547481.html |access-date=November 10, 2021 |quote='Is that your Bible?' a reporter is heard asking Mr Trump during the moment. He responded: 'It's a Bible.'}}</ref> [[Mariann Edgar Budde]], Bishop of the [[Episcopal Diocese of Washington]] said she was "outraged" by Trump's actions,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title='He Did Not Pray': Fallout Grows From Trump's Photo-Op At St. John's Church |newspaper=[[NPR]] |url=https://www.npr.org/2020/06/02/867705160/he-did-not-pray-fallout-grows-from-trump-s-photo-op-at-st-john-s-church |date=June 2, 2020 |first=Bill |last=Chappell |access-date=June 2, 2020}}</ref> which also received widespread condemnation from other religious leaders.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Jackson|first1=David|last2=Collins|first2=Michael|last3=Wu|first3=Nicholas|title=Washington archbishop denounces Trump visit to Catholic shrine as 'baffling' and 'reprehensible'|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/06/02/george-floyd-trump-visit-catholic-shrine-amid-photo-op-criticism/3122549001/|access-date=June 2, 2020|work=USA Today|publisher=[[Gannett]]|date=June 2, 2020|location=[[McLean, Virginia]]}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=George Floyd death: Archbishop attacks Trump as US unrest continues|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52897303|access-date=June 2, 2020|work=[[BBC News]]|publisher=[[BBC]]|date=June 2, 2020|location=[[London]]}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Outraged Episcopal leaders condemn tear-gassing clergy, protesters for Trump photo op at Washington church |url=https://www.episcopalnewsservice.org/2020/06/02/episcopal-leaders-express-outrage-condemn-tear-gassing-protesters-for-trump-photo-op-at-washington-church/ |first=Egan |last=Millard |website=Episcopal News Service |access-date=June 3, 2020 |date=June 2, 2020}}</ref> However, the reaction from the religious right and evangelicals generally praised the visit.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/06/trumps-biblical-spectacle-outside-st-johns-church/612529/ |last=Coppins |first=McKay |title=The Christians Who Loved Trump's Stunt |website=[[The Atlantic]] |date=June 2, 2020|access-date=June 4, 2020|quote="I thought it was completely appropriate for the president to stand in front of that church," Jeffress told me. "And by holding up the Bible, he was showing us that it teaches that, yes, God hates racism, it's despicable{{snd}}but God also hates lawlessness."}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/christian-right-leaders-loved-trumps-bible-photo-op.html|title=Christian Right Leaders Loved Trump's Bible Photo Op|website=[[New York (magazine)|New York]] |last=Kilgore|first=Ed|date=June 2, 2020|access-date=June 4, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/03/donald-trump-church-photo-op-evangelicals|title='He wears the armor of God': evangelicals hail Trump's church photo op |website=The Guardian |last=Teague |first=Matthew |date=June 3, 2020|access-date=June 4, 2020}}</ref>


==== Deployment of federal law enforcement to cities ====
==== Deployment of federal law enforcement to cities ====
Line 558: Line 558:
In August 2018, ''ProPublica'' reported that three wealthy patrons of Trump's [[Mar-a-Lago]] club, formed an "informal council" that strongly influenced VA policy, including reviewing a confidential $10{{spaces}}billion contract to modernize the VA's records.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.propublica.org/article/ike-perlmutter-bruce-moskowitz-marc-sherman-shadow-rulers-of-the-va|title=The Shadow Rulers of the VA|last=Arnsdorf|first=Isaac|date=August 7, 2018|website=ProPublica|access-date=August 10, 2018}}</ref> The [[Government Accountability Office]] announced in November 2018 that it would investigate the matter.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/26/mar-a-lago-trump-investigation-va-contracts-1015803 |first=Lorraine |last=Woellert |title=Watchdog office to probe Mar-a-Lago members' influence at VA |work=[[Politico]] |date=November 26, 2018 |access-date=November 26, 2018}}</ref>
In August 2018, ''ProPublica'' reported that three wealthy patrons of Trump's [[Mar-a-Lago]] club, formed an "informal council" that strongly influenced VA policy, including reviewing a confidential $10{{spaces}}billion contract to modernize the VA's records.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.propublica.org/article/ike-perlmutter-bruce-moskowitz-marc-sherman-shadow-rulers-of-the-va|title=The Shadow Rulers of the VA|last=Arnsdorf|first=Isaac|date=August 7, 2018|website=ProPublica|access-date=August 10, 2018}}</ref> The [[Government Accountability Office]] announced in November 2018 that it would investigate the matter.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/26/mar-a-lago-trump-investigation-va-contracts-1015803 |first=Lorraine |last=Woellert |title=Watchdog office to probe Mar-a-Lago members' influence at VA |work=[[Politico]] |date=November 26, 2018 |access-date=November 26, 2018}}</ref>


In 2018, Trump signed into law the VA MISSION Act, which expanded eligibility for the [[Veterans Choice]] program, allowing veterans greater access to private sector healthcare.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Slack |first=Donovan |title=Trump signs VA law to provide veterans more private health care choices. |work=[[USA Today]] |date=June 6, 2018 |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/06/trump-signs-law-expanding-vets-healthcare-choices/673906002/ |access-date=March 9, 2021}}</ref> Trump falsely asserted more than 150 times that he created the Veterans Choice program, which has in fact existed since being signed into law by president Obama in 2014.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/08/politics/trump-veterans-choice-paula-reid/index.html |date=August 9, 2020 |title=Trump walks out of news conference after reporter asks him about Veterans Choice lie he's told more than 150 times |first=Daniel |last=Dale |website=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||access-date=March 7, 2021 |title=Spin, hyperbole and deception: How Trump claimed credit for an Obama veterans achievement|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/23/trump-obama-veterans-choice-act/ |first=Ashley |last=Parker |date=October 23, 2020 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref>
In 2018, Trump signed into law the VA MISSION Act, which expanded eligibility for the [[Veterans Choice]] program, allowing veterans greater access to private sector healthcare.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Slack |first=Donovan |title=Trump signs VA law to provide veterans more private health care choices. |work=USA Today |date=June 6, 2018 |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/06/trump-signs-law-expanding-vets-healthcare-choices/673906002/ |access-date=March 9, 2021}}</ref> Trump falsely asserted more than 150 times that he created the Veterans Choice program, which has in fact existed since being signed into law by president Obama in 2014.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/08/politics/trump-veterans-choice-paula-reid/index.html |date=August 9, 2020 |title=Trump walks out of news conference after reporter asks him about Veterans Choice lie he's told more than 150 times |first=Daniel |last=Dale |website=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||access-date=March 7, 2021 |title=Spin, hyperbole and deception: How Trump claimed credit for an Obama veterans achievement|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/23/trump-obama-veterans-choice-act/ |first=Ashley |last=Parker |date=October 23, 2020 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref>


=== Voting rights ===
=== Voting rights ===
{{Main|Voting rights in the United States}}
{{Main|Voting rights in the United States}}
Under the Trump administration, the Justice Department limited enforcement actions to protect [[voting rights]], and in fact often defended restrictions on voting rights imposed by various states that have been challenged as [[Voter suppression in the United States|voter suppression]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Michael|last=Wines|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/12/us/voting-rights-voter-id-suppression.html |access-date=November 10, 2021 |title=Voting Rights Advocates Used to Have an Ally in the Government. That's Changing.|newspaper=The New York Times|date=August 13, 2018}}</ref><ref name="LevineVoting">{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Sam|last=Levine|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/23/us-justice-department-voting-rights-2020-election |access-date=November 10, 2021 |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |title='An embarrassment': Trump's justice department goes quiet on voting rights|date=June 23, 2020}}</ref> The Justice Department under Trump has filed only a single new case under the [[Voting Rights Act of 1965]].<ref name="LevineVoting" /> Trump's Justice Department opposed minority voters' interests in all of the major voting litigation since 2017 in which the [[United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division|Justice Department Civil Rights Division]] Voting Section has been involved.<ref name="LevineVoting" />
Under the Trump administration, the Justice Department limited enforcement actions to protect [[voting rights]], and in fact often defended restrictions on voting rights imposed by various states that have been challenged as [[Voter suppression in the United States|voter suppression]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Michael|last=Wines|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/12/us/voting-rights-voter-id-suppression.html |access-date=November 10, 2021 |title=Voting Rights Advocates Used to Have an Ally in the Government. That's Changing.|newspaper=The New York Times|date=August 13, 2018}}</ref><ref name="LevineVoting">{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Sam|last=Levine|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/23/us-justice-department-voting-rights-2020-election |access-date=November 10, 2021 |newspaper=The Guardian |title='An embarrassment': Trump's justice department goes quiet on voting rights|date=June 23, 2020}}</ref> The Justice Department under Trump has filed only a single new case under the [[Voting Rights Act of 1965]].<ref name="LevineVoting" /> Trump's Justice Department opposed minority voters' interests in all of the major voting litigation since 2017 in which the [[United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division|Justice Department Civil Rights Division]] Voting Section has been involved.<ref name="LevineVoting" />


Trump has repeatedly alleged, without evidence, there was widespread voter fraud.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.npr.org/2018/11/09/666018707/trump-scott-spread-claims-of-voter-fraud-as-florida-race-narrows |date=November 9, 2018 |first1=Miles |last1=Parks |first2=Emily |last2=Sullivan |first3=Brian |last3=Naylor |title=As Florida Races Narrow, Trump And Scott Spread Claims of Fraud Without Evidence|work=[[NPR]]|access-date=November 10, 2018}}</ref> The administration created a [[Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity|commission]] with the stated purpose to review the extent of voter fraud in the wake of Trump's false claim that millions of unauthorized votes cost him the popular vote in the 2016 election. It was chaired by Vice President Pence, while the day-to-day administrator was [[Kris Kobach]], best known for promoting restrictions on access to voting. The commission began its work by requesting each state to turn over detailed information about all registered voters in their database. Most states rejected the request, citing privacy concerns or state laws.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=Liz |last1=Stark |first2=Grace |last2=Hauck |date=July 5, 2017 |work=CNN |url=https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/03/politics/kris-kobach-letter-voter-fraud-commission-information/index.html |title=Forty-four states and DC have refused to give certain voter information to Trump commission |access-date=July 11, 2017}}</ref> Multiple lawsuits were filed against the commission. [[Maine Secretary of State]] [[Matthew Dunlap]] said Kobach was refusing to share working documents and scheduling information with him and the other Democrats on the commission. A federal judge ordered the commission to hand over the documents.<ref name="Woodward-2018">{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.pressherald.com/2018/01/06/trump-administration-resists-turning-over-documents-to-dunlap/ |first=Colin |last=Woodward |title=Trump refuses to release documents to Maine secretary of state despite judge's order|date=January 6, 2018|work=Portland Press Herald|access-date=January 7, 2018}}</ref> Shortly thereafter, Trump disbanded the commission, and informed Dunlap that it would not obey the court order to provide the documents because the commission no longer existed.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/us/politics/trump-voter-fraud-commission.html|title=Trump Disbands Commission on Voter Fraud|last=Haag|first=Matthew|date=January 3, 2018|work=The New York Times|access-date=January 4, 2018|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Election integrity experts argued that the commission was disbanded because of the lawsuits, which would have led to greater transparency and accountability and thus prevented the Republican members of the commission from producing a sham report to justify restrictions on voting rights.<ref name="Woodward-2018" /> It was later revealed the commission had, in its requests for Texas voter data, specifically asked for data that identifies voters with Hispanic surnames.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/trump-election-fraud-commission-bought-texas-election-data-flagging-hispanic-voters/2018/01/22/2791934a-fd55-11e7-ad8c-ecbb62019393_story.html|title=Trump voting commission bought Texas election data flagging Hispanic voters|last1=Hsu|first1=Spencer S.|last2=Wagner|first2=John|date=January 22, 2018|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=January 22, 2018|issn=0190-8286}}</ref>
Trump has repeatedly alleged, without evidence, there was widespread voter fraud.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.npr.org/2018/11/09/666018707/trump-scott-spread-claims-of-voter-fraud-as-florida-race-narrows |date=November 9, 2018 |first1=Miles |last1=Parks |first2=Emily |last2=Sullivan |first3=Brian |last3=Naylor |title=As Florida Races Narrow, Trump And Scott Spread Claims of Fraud Without Evidence|work=[[NPR]]|access-date=November 10, 2018}}</ref> The administration created a [[Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity|commission]] with the stated purpose to review the extent of voter fraud in the wake of Trump's false claim that millions of unauthorized votes cost him the popular vote in the 2016 election. It was chaired by Vice President Pence, while the day-to-day administrator was [[Kris Kobach]], best known for promoting restrictions on access to voting. The commission began its work by requesting each state to turn over detailed information about all registered voters in their database. Most states rejected the request, citing privacy concerns or state laws.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=Liz |last1=Stark |first2=Grace |last2=Hauck |date=July 5, 2017 |work=CNN |url=https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/03/politics/kris-kobach-letter-voter-fraud-commission-information/index.html |title=Forty-four states and DC have refused to give certain voter information to Trump commission |access-date=July 11, 2017}}</ref> Multiple lawsuits were filed against the commission. [[Maine Secretary of State]] [[Matthew Dunlap]] said Kobach was refusing to share working documents and scheduling information with him and the other Democrats on the commission. A federal judge ordered the commission to hand over the documents.<ref name="Woodward-2018">{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.pressherald.com/2018/01/06/trump-administration-resists-turning-over-documents-to-dunlap/ |first=Colin |last=Woodward |title=Trump refuses to release documents to Maine secretary of state despite judge's order|date=January 6, 2018|work=Portland Press Herald|access-date=January 7, 2018}}</ref> Shortly thereafter, Trump disbanded the commission, and informed Dunlap that it would not obey the court order to provide the documents because the commission no longer existed.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/us/politics/trump-voter-fraud-commission.html|title=Trump Disbands Commission on Voter Fraud|last=Haag|first=Matthew|date=January 3, 2018|work=The New York Times|access-date=January 4, 2018|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Election integrity experts argued that the commission was disbanded because of the lawsuits, which would have led to greater transparency and accountability and thus prevented the Republican members of the commission from producing a sham report to justify restrictions on voting rights.<ref name="Woodward-2018" /> It was later revealed the commission had, in its requests for Texas voter data, specifically asked for data that identifies voters with Hispanic surnames.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/trump-election-fraud-commission-bought-texas-election-data-flagging-hispanic-voters/2018/01/22/2791934a-fd55-11e7-ad8c-ecbb62019393_story.html|title=Trump voting commission bought Texas election data flagging Hispanic voters|last1=Hsu|first1=Spencer S.|last2=Wagner|first2=John|date=January 22, 2018|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=January 22, 2018|issn=0190-8286}}</ref>
Line 602: Line 602:
The number of U.S. troops deployed to Afghanistan decreased significantly during Trump's presidency. By the end of Trump's term in office troop levels in Afghanistan were at the lowest levels since the early days of the war in 2001.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=US troop numbers in Afghanistan drop to lowest level since 2001 |first=Phillip Walter |last=Wellman |work=Stars and Stripes |date=January 15, 2021 |url=https://www.stripes.com/theaters/middle_east/us-troop-numbers-in-afghanistan-drop-to-lowest-level-since-2001-1.658621 |access-date=March 9, 2021}}</ref> Trump's presidency saw an expansion of drone warfare and a massive increase in civilian casualties from airstrikes in Afghanistan relative to the Obama administration.<ref name="crawford">{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Crawford|first=Neta|date=2020|title=Afghanistan's Rising Civilian Death Toll Due to Airstrikes, 2017–2020|url=https://www.carnegie.org/publications/afghanistans-rising-civilian-death-toll-due-airstrikes-2017-2020/|access-date=December 20, 2020|website=Carnegie Corporation of New York}}</ref>
The number of U.S. troops deployed to Afghanistan decreased significantly during Trump's presidency. By the end of Trump's term in office troop levels in Afghanistan were at the lowest levels since the early days of the war in 2001.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=US troop numbers in Afghanistan drop to lowest level since 2001 |first=Phillip Walter |last=Wellman |work=Stars and Stripes |date=January 15, 2021 |url=https://www.stripes.com/theaters/middle_east/us-troop-numbers-in-afghanistan-drop-to-lowest-level-since-2001-1.658621 |access-date=March 9, 2021}}</ref> Trump's presidency saw an expansion of drone warfare and a massive increase in civilian casualties from airstrikes in Afghanistan relative to the Obama administration.<ref name="crawford">{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Crawford|first=Neta|date=2020|title=Afghanistan's Rising Civilian Death Toll Due to Airstrikes, 2017–2020|url=https://www.carnegie.org/publications/afghanistans-rising-civilian-death-toll-due-airstrikes-2017-2020/|access-date=December 20, 2020|website=Carnegie Corporation of New York}}</ref>


In February 2020, [[United States–Taliban deal|the Trump administration signed a deal with the Taliban]], which if upheld by the Taliban, would result in the [[2020–2021 U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan|withdrawal of United States troops from Afghanistan]] by May 2021 (Trump's successor Joe Biden later extended the deadline to September 2021).<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Afghan conflict: US and Taliban sign deal to end 18-year war |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51689443 |access-date=August 16, 2021 |work=[[BBC News]] |date=February 29, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Brown |first1=Matthew |title=A timeline of the US withdrawal and Taliban recapture of Afghanistan |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/08/15/timeline-afghanistans-history-and-us-involvement/8143131002/ |access-date=August 16, 2021 |work=[[USA Today]] |date=August 15, 2021}}</ref> As part of the deal, the U.S. agreed to the release of 5,000 Taliban members who were imprisoned by the Afghan government; some of these ex-prisoners went on to join the [[2021 Taliban offensive]] that felled the Afghan government.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Mashal |first1=Mujib |last2=Faizi |first2=Fatima |title=Afghanistan to Release Last Taliban Prisoners, Removing Final Hurdle to Talks |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/09/world/asia/afghanistan-taliban-prisoners-peace-talks.html |access-date=August 18, 2021 |work=The New York Times |date=September 3, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Weissert |first1=Will |last2=Fram |first2=Alan |title=GOP hits Biden despite divides over Afghanistan withdrawal |url=https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-afghanistan-036874ebcb40acb404ac1a7f3db11f1a |access-date=August 18, 2021 |work=Associated Press|date=August 17, 2021}}</ref>
In February 2020, [[United States–Taliban deal|the Trump administration signed a deal with the Taliban]], which if upheld by the Taliban, would result in the [[2020–2021 U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan|withdrawal of United States troops from Afghanistan]] by May 2021 (Trump's successor Joe Biden later extended the deadline to September 2021).<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Afghan conflict: US and Taliban sign deal to end 18-year war |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51689443 |access-date=August 16, 2021 |work=[[BBC News]] |date=February 29, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Brown |first1=Matthew |title=A timeline of the US withdrawal and Taliban recapture of Afghanistan |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/08/15/timeline-afghanistans-history-and-us-involvement/8143131002/ |access-date=August 16, 2021 |work=USA Today |date=August 15, 2021}}</ref> As part of the deal, the U.S. agreed to the release of 5,000 Taliban members who were imprisoned by the Afghan government; some of these ex-prisoners went on to join the [[2021 Taliban offensive]] that felled the Afghan government.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Mashal |first1=Mujib |last2=Faizi |first2=Fatima |title=Afghanistan to Release Last Taliban Prisoners, Removing Final Hurdle to Talks |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/09/world/asia/afghanistan-taliban-prisoners-peace-talks.html |access-date=August 18, 2021 |work=The New York Times |date=September 3, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Weissert |first1=Will |last2=Fram |first2=Alan |title=GOP hits Biden despite divides over Afghanistan withdrawal |url=https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-afghanistan-036874ebcb40acb404ac1a7f3db11f1a |access-date=August 18, 2021 |work=Associated Press|date=August 17, 2021}}</ref>


In 2020, US casualties in Afghanistan reached their lowest level for the entire war.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=http://icasualties.org/App/AfghanFatalities |website=icasualties.org |title= Afghanistan Fatalities Total: 3557 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201231041605/http://icasualties.org/App/AfghanFatalities |access-date=November 8, 2021 |archive-date=December 31, 2020}}</ref> In Iraq, casualties increased, being significantly higher in Trump's term than Obama's second term.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=http://www.icasualties.org/App/Fatalities |title= Iraq Fatalities Total: 4902 |website=icasualties.org |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211028103153/http://www.icasualties.org/App/Fatalities |access-date=November 8, 2021 |archive-date= October 28, 2021}}</ref>
In 2020, US casualties in Afghanistan reached their lowest level for the entire war.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=http://icasualties.org/App/AfghanFatalities |website=icasualties.org |title= Afghanistan Fatalities Total: 3557 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201231041605/http://icasualties.org/App/AfghanFatalities |access-date=November 8, 2021 |archive-date=December 31, 2020}}</ref> In Iraq, casualties increased, being significantly higher in Trump's term than Obama's second term.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=http://www.icasualties.org/App/Fatalities |title= Iraq Fatalities Total: 4902 |website=icasualties.org |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211028103153/http://www.icasualties.org/App/Fatalities |access-date=November 8, 2021 |archive-date= October 28, 2021}}</ref>
Line 622: Line 622:
{{Main|Turkey–United States relations}}
{{Main|Turkey–United States relations}}
[[File:President Trump and President Erdoğan joint statement in the Roosevelt Room, May 16, 2017.jpg|thumb|Trump with Turkish president [[Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]], May 16, 2017]]
[[File:President Trump and President Erdoğan joint statement in the Roosevelt Room, May 16, 2017.jpg|thumb|Trump with Turkish president [[Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]], May 16, 2017]]
In October 2019, after Trump spoke to Turkish president [[Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]], the White House acknowledged that Turkey would be carrying out a [[2019 Turkish offensive into north-eastern Syria|planned military offensive into northern Syria]]; as such, [[American-led intervention in the Syrian civil war|U.S. troops in northern Syria]] were withdrawn from the area to avoid interference with that operation. The statement also passed responsibility for the area's captured [[Islamic State|ISIS]] fighters to Turkey.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Chappell|first1=Bill|last2=Neuman|first2=Scott|title=In Major Policy Shift, U.S. Will Stand Aside As Turkish Forces Extend Reach In Syria|url=https://www.npr.org/2019/10/07/767777899/in-major-policy-shift-u-s-will-stand-aside-as-turkish-forces-extend-reach-in-syr|access-date=October 11, 2019|work=[[NPR]]|date=October 7, 2019}}</ref> Congress members of both parties denounced the move, including Republican allies of Trump like Senator [[Lindsey Graham]]. They argued that the move betrayed the American-allied Kurds, and would benefit ISIS, Russia, Iran and Bashar al-Assad's Syrian regime.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/07/trump-turkey-syria-invasion-037052|title=Republicans unload on Trump for Syria shift when he needs them most|last=Forgey|first=Quint|date=October 7, 2019|work=[[Politico]]|access-date=October 7, 2019}}</ref> Trump defended the move, citing the high cost of supporting the Kurds, and the lack of support from the Kurds in past U.S. wars.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Singh|first=Maanvi|title=Trump defends Syria decision by saying Kurds 'didn't help us with Normandy'|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/09/trump-syria-kurds-normandy|access-date=October 10, 2019|work=[[The Guardian]]|date=October 9, 2019}}</ref> Within a week of the U.S. pullout, Turkey proceeded to attack Kurdish-controlled areas in northeast Syria.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Turkey Syria offensive: Tens of thousands flee homes|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-50008418 |access-date=October 11, 2019|work=[[BBC News]]|date=October 10, 2019}}</ref> Kurdish forces then announced an alliance with the Syrian government and its Russian allies, in a united effort to repel Turkey.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Cornish|first1=Chloe|last2=Pitel|first2=Laura|last3=Fedor|first3=Lauren|title=Kurds strike deal with Russia and Syria to stem Turkish assault|url=https://www.ft.com/content/8139b25e-eda6-11e9-ad1e-4367d8281195|access-date=October 14, 2019|work=[[Financial Times]]|date=October 13, 2019}}</ref>
In October 2019, after Trump spoke to Turkish president [[Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]], the White House acknowledged that Turkey would be carrying out a [[2019 Turkish offensive into north-eastern Syria|planned military offensive into northern Syria]]; as such, [[American-led intervention in the Syrian civil war|U.S. troops in northern Syria]] were withdrawn from the area to avoid interference with that operation. The statement also passed responsibility for the area's captured [[Islamic State|ISIS]] fighters to Turkey.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Chappell|first1=Bill|last2=Neuman|first2=Scott|title=In Major Policy Shift, U.S. Will Stand Aside As Turkish Forces Extend Reach In Syria|url=https://www.npr.org/2019/10/07/767777899/in-major-policy-shift-u-s-will-stand-aside-as-turkish-forces-extend-reach-in-syr|access-date=October 11, 2019|work=[[NPR]]|date=October 7, 2019}}</ref> Congress members of both parties denounced the move, including Republican allies of Trump like Senator [[Lindsey Graham]]. They argued that the move betrayed the American-allied Kurds, and would benefit ISIS, Russia, Iran and Bashar al-Assad's Syrian regime.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/07/trump-turkey-syria-invasion-037052|title=Republicans unload on Trump for Syria shift when he needs them most|last=Forgey|first=Quint|date=October 7, 2019|work=[[Politico]]|access-date=October 7, 2019}}</ref> Trump defended the move, citing the high cost of supporting the Kurds, and the lack of support from the Kurds in past U.S. wars.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Singh|first=Maanvi|title=Trump defends Syria decision by saying Kurds 'didn't help us with Normandy'|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/09/trump-syria-kurds-normandy|access-date=October 10, 2019|work=The Guardian|date=October 9, 2019}}</ref> Within a week of the U.S. pullout, Turkey proceeded to attack Kurdish-controlled areas in northeast Syria.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Turkey Syria offensive: Tens of thousands flee homes|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-50008418 |access-date=October 11, 2019|work=[[BBC News]]|date=October 10, 2019}}</ref> Kurdish forces then announced an alliance with the Syrian government and its Russian allies, in a united effort to repel Turkey.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Cornish|first1=Chloe|last2=Pitel|first2=Laura|last3=Fedor|first3=Lauren|title=Kurds strike deal with Russia and Syria to stem Turkish assault|url=https://www.ft.com/content/8139b25e-eda6-11e9-ad1e-4367d8281195|access-date=October 14, 2019|work=[[Financial Times]]|date=October 13, 2019}}</ref>


=== Iran ===
=== Iran ===
{{Main|Iran–United States relations|United States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action}}
{{Main|Iran–United States relations|United States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action}}


After an Iranian missile test on January 29, 2017, and Houthi attacks on Saudi warships, the Trump administration sanctioned 12 companies and 13 individuals suspected of being involved in Iran's missile program.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Borger|first1=Julian|author-link1=Julian Borger|last2=Smith|first2=David|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/03/trump-administration-iran-sanctions|title=Trump administration imposes new sanctions on Iran|work=[[The Guardian]]|date=February 3, 2017|access-date=November 9, 2018}}</ref> In May 2018, Trump [[United States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action|withdrew the United States]] from the [[Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action]] (JCPOA), the 2015 agreement between Iran, the U.S., and five other countries that lifted most economic sanctions against Iran in return for Iran agreeing to restrictions on its nuclear program.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Lederman|first1=Josh|last2=Lucey|first2=Catherine|date=May 8, 2018|title=Trump declares US leaving 'horrible' Iran nuclear accord|work=Associated Press|url=https://apnews.com/article/cead755353a1455bbef08ef289448994/Trump-decides-to-exit-nuclear-accord-with-Iran|access-date=May 8, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/world/middleeast/trump-iran-nuclear-deal.html|title=Trump Abandons Iran Nuclear Deal He Long Scorned|first=Mark|last=Landler|author-link=Mark Landler|date=May 8, 2018|access-date=October 4, 2021|work=The New York Times}}</ref> Analysts determined that, after the United States's withdrawal, Iran moved closer to developing a nuclear weapon.<ref name="close">{{cite web|last=Hennigan|first=W.J.|title='They're Very Close.' U.S. General Says Iran Is Nearly Able to Build a Nuclear Weapon|url=https://time.com/6123380/iran-near-nuclear-weapon-capability/|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]]|date=November 24, 2021 |access-date=December 18, 2021}}</ref>
After an Iranian missile test on January 29, 2017, and Houthi attacks on Saudi warships, the Trump administration sanctioned 12 companies and 13 individuals suspected of being involved in Iran's missile program.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Borger|first1=Julian|author-link1=Julian Borger|last2=Smith|first2=David|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/03/trump-administration-iran-sanctions|title=Trump administration imposes new sanctions on Iran|work=The Guardian|date=February 3, 2017|access-date=November 9, 2018}}</ref> In May 2018, Trump [[United States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action|withdrew the United States]] from the [[Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action]] (JCPOA), the 2015 agreement between Iran, the U.S., and five other countries that lifted most economic sanctions against Iran in return for Iran agreeing to restrictions on its nuclear program.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Lederman|first1=Josh|last2=Lucey|first2=Catherine|date=May 8, 2018|title=Trump declares US leaving 'horrible' Iran nuclear accord|work=Associated Press|url=https://apnews.com/article/cead755353a1455bbef08ef289448994/Trump-decides-to-exit-nuclear-accord-with-Iran|access-date=May 8, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/world/middleeast/trump-iran-nuclear-deal.html|title=Trump Abandons Iran Nuclear Deal He Long Scorned|first=Mark|last=Landler|author-link=Mark Landler|date=May 8, 2018|access-date=October 4, 2021|work=The New York Times}}</ref> Analysts determined that, after the United States's withdrawal, Iran moved closer to developing a nuclear weapon.<ref name="close">{{cite web|last=Hennigan|first=W.J.|title='They're Very Close.' U.S. General Says Iran Is Nearly Able to Build a Nuclear Weapon|url=https://time.com/6123380/iran-near-nuclear-weapon-capability/|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]]|date=November 24, 2021 |access-date=December 18, 2021}}</ref>


In January 2020, Trump ordered [[Assassination of Qasem Soleimani|a U.S. airstrike]] that killed Iranian general [[Qasem Soleimani]], who had planned nearly every significant operation by Iranian forces over the past two decades.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/02/world/middleeast/qassem-soleimani-iraq-iran-attack.html|title=U.S. Strike in Iraq Kills Qassim Suleimani, Commander of Iranian Forces|last1=Crowley|first1=Michael|author-link1=Michael Crowley (journalist)|last2=Hassan|first2=Falih|last3=Schmitt|first3=Eric|author-link3=Eric P. Schmitt|date=January 2, 2020|work=The New York Times|access-date=January 3, 2020}}</ref> Trump threatened to hit 52 Iranian sites, including some "important to Iran & the Iranian culture", if Iran retaliated.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Daniel|first1=Douglas K.|last2=Lemire|first2=Jonathan|url=https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-donald-trump-nancy-pelosi-ap-top-news-international-news-75944e42ccc66ac08ee5122e080d7f33|title=Trump says 52 targets already lined up if Iran retaliates|work=Associated Press|date=January 5, 2020 |access-date=November 3, 2022}}</ref> The threat to hit cultural sites was seen as illegal and both Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that the U.S. would not attack such sites, but would "follow the laws of armed conflict" and "behave inside the system".<ref name="Wamsley_1/6/2020">{{cite web|last=Wamsley|first=Laurel|title=Trump Says He'll Target Iran's Cultural Sites. That's Illegal|website=[[NPR]]|date=January 6, 2020|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/01/06/794006073/trump-says-hell-target-iran-s-cultural-sites-that-s-illegal | access-date=November 6, 2022}}</ref> Iran did retaliate with [[Operation Martyr Soleimani|ballistic missile strikes against two U.S. airbases]] in Iraq.<ref name="close" /> On the same day, amid the heightened tensions between the United States and Iran, Iran accidentally<ref name="Ward_1/9/2020" /> shot down [[Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752]] after takeoff from Tehran airport.<ref name="Baker_et al_1/11/2020">{{cite web|last1=Baker|first1=Peter|last2=Bergman|first2=Ronen|last3=Kirkpatrick|first3=David D.|last4=Barnes|first4=Julian E.|last5=Rubin|first5=Alissa J.|date=January 11, 2020|title=Seven Days in January: How Trump Pushed U.S. and Iran to the Brink of War|website=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/11/us/politics/iran-trump.html |access-date=November 8, 2022}}</ref><ref name="Ward_1/9/2020">{{cite web|last=Ward|first=Alex|title=Evidence is mounting that Iran accidentally shot down the Ukraine flight|website=[[Vox (website)|Vox]]|date=January 9, 2020|url=https://www.vox.com/2020/1/9/21059004/iran-plane-crash-missile-video-trump-ukraine | access-date=November 8, 2022}}</ref><ref name="Motamedi_4/17/2021">{{cite web|last=Motamedi|first=Maziar|title=Iran rejects claim Ukraine's plane shot down intentionally|website=[[Al Jazeera English|Al Jazeera]]|date=April 17, 2021|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/17/iran-rejects-claim-ukraines-plane-was-shot-down-intentionally | access-date=November 8, 2022}}</ref>
In January 2020, Trump ordered [[Assassination of Qasem Soleimani|a U.S. airstrike]] that killed Iranian general [[Qasem Soleimani]], who had planned nearly every significant operation by Iranian forces over the past two decades.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/02/world/middleeast/qassem-soleimani-iraq-iran-attack.html|title=U.S. Strike in Iraq Kills Qassim Suleimani, Commander of Iranian Forces|last1=Crowley|first1=Michael|author-link1=Michael Crowley (journalist)|last2=Hassan|first2=Falih|last3=Schmitt|first3=Eric|author-link3=Eric P. Schmitt|date=January 2, 2020|work=The New York Times|access-date=January 3, 2020}}</ref> Trump threatened to hit 52 Iranian sites, including some "important to Iran & the Iranian culture", if Iran retaliated.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Daniel|first1=Douglas K.|last2=Lemire|first2=Jonathan|url=https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-donald-trump-nancy-pelosi-ap-top-news-international-news-75944e42ccc66ac08ee5122e080d7f33|title=Trump says 52 targets already lined up if Iran retaliates|work=Associated Press|date=January 5, 2020 |access-date=November 3, 2022}}</ref> The threat to hit cultural sites was seen as illegal and both Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that the U.S. would not attack such sites, but would "follow the laws of armed conflict" and "behave inside the system".<ref name="Wamsley_1/6/2020">{{cite web|last=Wamsley|first=Laurel|title=Trump Says He'll Target Iran's Cultural Sites. That's Illegal|website=[[NPR]]|date=January 6, 2020|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/01/06/794006073/trump-says-hell-target-iran-s-cultural-sites-that-s-illegal | access-date=November 6, 2022}}</ref> Iran did retaliate with [[Operation Martyr Soleimani|ballistic missile strikes against two U.S. airbases]] in Iraq.<ref name="close" /> On the same day, amid the heightened tensions between the United States and Iran, Iran accidentally<ref name="Ward_1/9/2020" /> shot down [[Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752]] after takeoff from Tehran airport.<ref name="Baker_et al_1/11/2020">{{cite web|last1=Baker|first1=Peter|last2=Bergman|first2=Ronen|last3=Kirkpatrick|first3=David D.|last4=Barnes|first4=Julian E.|last5=Rubin|first5=Alissa J.|date=January 11, 2020|title=Seven Days in January: How Trump Pushed U.S. and Iran to the Brink of War|website=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/11/us/politics/iran-trump.html |access-date=November 8, 2022}}</ref><ref name="Ward_1/9/2020">{{cite web|last=Ward|first=Alex|title=Evidence is mounting that Iran accidentally shot down the Ukraine flight|website=[[Vox (website)|Vox]]|date=January 9, 2020|url=https://www.vox.com/2020/1/9/21059004/iran-plane-crash-missile-video-trump-ukraine | access-date=November 8, 2022}}</ref><ref name="Motamedi_4/17/2021">{{cite web|last=Motamedi|first=Maziar|title=Iran rejects claim Ukraine's plane shot down intentionally|website=[[Al Jazeera English|Al Jazeera]]|date=April 17, 2021|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/17/iran-rejects-claim-ukraines-plane-was-shot-down-intentionally | access-date=November 8, 2022}}</ref>
Line 718: Line 718:
[[File:Trump AVM opening ceremony.jpg|thumb| [[Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]], then the [[prime minister of Turkey]], attended the opening of the [[Trump Towers Istanbul]] AVM in 2012.]]
[[File:Trump AVM opening ceremony.jpg|thumb| [[Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]], then the [[prime minister of Turkey]], attended the opening of the [[Trump Towers Istanbul]] AVM in 2012.]]


Trump's presidency was marked by significant public concern about [[conflict of interest]] stemming from his diverse business ventures. In the lead up to his inauguration, Trump promised to remove himself from the day-to-day operations of his businesses.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/11/us/politics/trump-press-conference-transcript.html|title=Donald Trump's News Conference: Full Transcript and Video|date=January 11, 2017|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=April 30, 2017}}</ref> Trump placed his sons [[Eric Trump]] and [[Donald Trump Jr.]] at the head of his businesses claiming they would not communicate with him regarding his interests. However, critics noted that this would not prevent him from having input into his businesses and knowing how to benefit himself, and Trump continued to receive quarterly updates on his businesses.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/24/eric-trump-business-conflicts-of-interest|title=Eric Trump says he will keep father updated on business despite 'pact'|first=Alan|last=Yuhas|date=March 24, 2017|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=April 30, 2017}}</ref> As his presidency progressed, he failed to take steps or show interest in further distancing himself from his business interests resulting in numerous potential conflicts.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/08/donald-trump-conflicts-of-interests/508382/ |date=August 9, 2017 |title=Donald Trump's Conflicts of Interest: A Crib Sheet|first=Jeremy|last=Venook |work=[[The Atlantic]] |access-date=April 30, 2017}}</ref> Ethics experts found Trump's plan to address conflicts of interest between his position as president and his private business interests to be entirely inadequate.<ref name="YourishBuchanan">{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=Karen |last1=Yourish |first2=Larry |last2=Buchanan |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/12/us/politics/ethics-experts-trumps-conflicts-of-interest.html |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=It 'Falls Short in Every Respect': Ethics Experts Pan Trump's Conflicts Plan |newspaper=The New York Times |date=January 12, 2017}}</ref> Unlike every other president in the last 40 years, Trump did not put his business interests in a [[blind trust]] or equivalent arrangement "to cleanly sever himself from his business interests".<ref name="YourishBuchanan" /> In January 2018, a year into his presidency, Trump owned stakes in hundreds of businesses.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump Ethics Monitor: Has The President Kept His Promises?|url=https://www.npr.org/2017/02/17/513724796/trump-ethics-monitor-has-the-president-kept-his-promises|newspaper=[[NPR]]|date=February 17, 2017|access-date=January 20, 2018|last1=Selyukh|first1=Alina|last2=Sullivan|first2=Emily|last3=Maffei|first3=Lucia}}</ref> [[Anne Applebaum]] noted how Trump properties, including Trump Tower, has been used for [[Money laundering|laundering money]] by [[Kleptocracy|kleptocrats]] around the world (though there is no evidence Trump knew that was going on) and that two-thirds of the sales in Trump-owned properties went to anonymous buyers in 2017, raising potential [[Conflict of interest|conflicts-of-interest]] with a sitting president of the United States.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Applebaum |first=Anne |date=August 30, 2024 |title=The kleptocrats aren't just stealing money. They're stealing democracy |url=https://www.ft.com/content/0876ef7a-bf88-463e-b8ca-bd9b4a11665c |work=Financial Times}}</ref>
Trump's presidency was marked by significant public concern about [[conflict of interest]] stemming from his diverse business ventures. In the lead up to his inauguration, Trump promised to remove himself from the day-to-day operations of his businesses.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/11/us/politics/trump-press-conference-transcript.html|title=Donald Trump's News Conference: Full Transcript and Video|date=January 11, 2017|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=April 30, 2017}}</ref> Trump placed his sons [[Eric Trump]] and [[Donald Trump Jr.]] at the head of his businesses claiming they would not communicate with him regarding his interests. However, critics noted that this would not prevent him from having input into his businesses and knowing how to benefit himself, and Trump continued to receive quarterly updates on his businesses.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/24/eric-trump-business-conflicts-of-interest|title=Eric Trump says he will keep father updated on business despite 'pact'|first=Alan|last=Yuhas|date=March 24, 2017|newspaper=The Guardian|access-date=April 30, 2017}}</ref> As his presidency progressed, he failed to take steps or show interest in further distancing himself from his business interests resulting in numerous potential conflicts.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/08/donald-trump-conflicts-of-interests/508382/ |date=August 9, 2017 |title=Donald Trump's Conflicts of Interest: A Crib Sheet|first=Jeremy|last=Venook |work=[[The Atlantic]] |access-date=April 30, 2017}}</ref> Ethics experts found Trump's plan to address conflicts of interest between his position as president and his private business interests to be entirely inadequate.<ref name="YourishBuchanan">{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=Karen |last1=Yourish |first2=Larry |last2=Buchanan |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/12/us/politics/ethics-experts-trumps-conflicts-of-interest.html |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=It 'Falls Short in Every Respect': Ethics Experts Pan Trump's Conflicts Plan |newspaper=The New York Times |date=January 12, 2017}}</ref> Unlike every other president in the last 40 years, Trump did not put his business interests in a [[blind trust]] or equivalent arrangement "to cleanly sever himself from his business interests".<ref name="YourishBuchanan" /> In January 2018, a year into his presidency, Trump owned stakes in hundreds of businesses.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump Ethics Monitor: Has The President Kept His Promises?|url=https://www.npr.org/2017/02/17/513724796/trump-ethics-monitor-has-the-president-kept-his-promises|newspaper=[[NPR]]|date=February 17, 2017|access-date=January 20, 2018|last1=Selyukh|first1=Alina|last2=Sullivan|first2=Emily|last3=Maffei|first3=Lucia}}</ref> [[Anne Applebaum]] noted how Trump properties, including Trump Tower, has been used for [[Money laundering|laundering money]] by [[Kleptocracy|kleptocrats]] around the world (though there is no evidence Trump knew that was going on) and that two-thirds of the sales in Trump-owned properties went to anonymous buyers in 2017, raising potential [[Conflict of interest|conflicts-of-interest]] with a sitting president of the United States.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Applebaum |first=Anne |date=August 30, 2024 |title=The kleptocrats aren't just stealing money. They're stealing democracy |url=https://www.ft.com/content/0876ef7a-bf88-463e-b8ca-bd9b4a11665c |work=Financial Times}}</ref>


After Trump took office, the [[watchdog group]] [[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]], represented by a number of constitutional scholars, sued him<ref name="Riback">{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/23/why-trumps-business-conflicts-cant-and-wont-just-be-swept-aside-commentary.html |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Why Trump's business conflicts can't – and won't – just be swept aside|first=Chris|last=Riback|date=January 23, 2017|work=[[CNBC]]}}</ref> for violations of the [[Foreign Emoluments Clause]] (a [[United States Constitution|constitutional]] provision that bars the president or any other federal official from taking gifts or payments from foreign governments), because his hotels and other businesses accept payment from foreign governments.<ref name="Riback" /><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/liberal-watchdog-group-sues-trump-alleging-he-violated-constitutional-ban/2017/01/22/5e8b35c2-e113-11e6-a547-5fb9411d332c_story.html |access-date=November 7, 2021|title=Liberal watchdog group sues Trump, alleging he violated constitutional ban|first1=David A.|last1=Fahrenthold|author1-link=David Fahrenthold|first2=Jonathan|last2=O'Connell|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=January 23, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=David A.|last1=Fahrenthold|author1-link=David Fahrenthold|first2=Jonathan|last2=O'Connell|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/what-is-the-emoluments-clause-does-it-apply-to-president-trump/2017/01/23/12aa7808-e185-11e6-a547-5fb9411d332c_story.html |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=What is the 'Emoluments Clause'? Does it apply to President Trump?|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=January 23, 2017}}</ref> CREW separately filed a complaint with the [[General Services Administration]] (GSA) over [[Trump International Hotel Washington, D.C.]]; the 2013 lease that Trump and the GSA signed "explicitly forbids any elected government official from holding the lease or benefiting from it".<ref name="Horowitz">{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Julia |last=Horowitz |url=https://money.cnn.com/2017/01/20/news/trump-conflicts-inauguration/ |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=President Trump hit immediately with ethics complaint |work=CNN |date=January 20, 2017}}</ref> The GSA said it was "reviewing the situation".<ref name="Horowitz" /> By May 2017, the ''[[CREW v. Trump]]'' lawsuit had grown with additional plaintiffs and alleged violations of the [[Domestic Emoluments Clause]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/us/politics/trump-crew-lawsuit-constitution.html |title=Watchdog Group Expands Lawsuit Against Trump |date=April 18, 2017|last=LaFraniere|first=Sharon |newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=June 11, 2017}}</ref> In June 2017, attorneys from the Department of Justice filed a motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that the plaintiffs had no right to sue<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/06/09/532302106/trump-administration-calls-for-lawsuit-about-his-businesses-to-be-dismissed|title=Trump Administration Calls For Lawsuit About His Businesses To Be Dismissed|first=Marilyn|last=Geewax|date=June 9, 2017|access-date=June 10, 2017|work=[[NPR]]}}</ref> and that the described conduct was not illegal.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-emoluments-foreign-government-payments-2017-6 |title=Justice Department argues it's fine for Trump to take payments from foreign governments, citing George Washington |website=Business Insider |date=June 10, 2017 |access-date=June 10, 2017 |first=Allan |last=Smith}}</ref> Also in June 2017, two more lawsuits were filed based on the [[Foreign Emoluments Clause]]: ''[[D.C. and Maryland v. Trump]]'',<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=LaFrainere|first=Sharon|title=Maryland and D.C. Sue Trump Over His Private Businesses|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/12/us/trump-lawsuit-private-businesses.html|access-date=June 12, 2017|newspaper=The New York Times|date=June 12, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Davis|first=Aaron C.|title=D.C. and Maryland sue President Trump, alleging breach of constitutional oath|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-and-maryland-to-sue-president-trump-alleging-breach-of-constitutional-oath/2017/06/11/0059e1f0-4f19-11e7-91eb-9611861a988f_story.html|access-date=June 12, 2017|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=June 12, 2017}}</ref> and ''[[Blumenthal v. Trump]]'', which was signed by more than one-third of the voting members of [[United States Congress|Congress]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Bykowicz|first=Julie|title=Democrats in Congress are the latest to sue President Trump|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/06/13/democrats-congress-are-latest-sue-president-trump/1tG7Mqk5tO4kxjHDh94ABO/story.html|access-date=June 14, 2017|agency=Associated Press|newspaper=[[Boston Globe]]|date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=June 14, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170614054544/http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/06/13/democrats-congress-are-latest-sue-president-trump/1tG7Mqk5tO4kxjHDh94ABO/story.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[United States District Judge]] [[George B. Daniels]] dismissed the CREW case on December 21, 2017, holding that plaintiffs lacked [[Standing (law)|standing]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/judge-dismisses-lawsuit-alleging-trump-violated-constitution/2017/12/21/31011510-e697-11e7-ab50-621fe0588340_story.html |first1=David A. |last1=Fahrenthold |first2=Jonathan |last2=O'Connell |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Judge dismisses lawsuit alleging Trump violated Constitution|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=December 21, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/EmolumentsDismissal.pdf |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Trump |quote=17 Civ. 458 |publisher=S.D.N.Y. |date=December 21, 2017 |via=courthousenews.com}}</ref> ''D.C. and Maryland v. Trump'' cleared three judicial hurdles to proceed to the [[Discovery (law)|discovery]] phase during 2018,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/28/us/trump-emoluments-lawsuit.html|title=Lawsuit Over Trump's Ties to His Businesses Is Allowed to Advance|first=Sharon|last=LaFraniere|date=March 28, 2018|newspaper=The New York Times |access-date=January 3, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/25/us/politics/trump-emoluments-lawsuit.html|title=In Ruling Against Trump, Judge Defines Anticorruption Clauses in Constitution for First Time|first=Sharon|last=LaFraniere|date=July 25, 2018|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=January 3, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/02/us/politics/trump-emoluments-lawsuit-evidence.html|title=Judge Orders Evidence to Be Gathered in Emoluments Case Against Trump|first=Sharon|last=LaFraniere|date=November 2, 2018|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=January 3, 2019}}</ref> with prosecutors issuing 38 subpoenas to Trump's businesses and cabinet departments in December before the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit|Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals]] issued a [[Stay of proceedings|stay]] days later at the behest of the Justice Department, pending hearings in March 2019.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-attorneys-general-subpoena-trump-irs-20181204-story.html|title=2 attorneys general issue subpoenas to Trump entities in Washington hotel case|first1=Jonathan |last1=O'Connell |first2=Ann E. |last2=Marimow |date=December 4, 2018 |first3=David A. |last3=Fahrenthold |newspaper=[[Chicago Tribune]] |access-date=January 4, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/17/us/politics/justice-department-trump-emoluments.html|title=Justice Department Asks Court to Halt Emoluments Case Against Trump|first=Sharon|last=LaFraniere|date=December 17, 2018|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=January 4, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-emoluments-idUSKCN1OJ30R |first=Jan |last=Wolfe |title=U.S. appeals court grants Trump request for halt to emoluments case|date=December 21, 2018|work=Reuters|access-date=January 3, 2019}}</ref> NBC News reported that by June 2019 representatives of 22 governments had spent money at Trump properties.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/reps-22-foreign-governments-have-spent-money-trump-properties-n1015806 |access-date=November 7, 2021 |date=June 12, 2019 |first1=Shelby |last1=Hanssen |first2=Ken |last2=Dilanian |title=Reps of 22 foreign governments have spent money at Trump properties|website=[[NBC News]]}}</ref> In January 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuits as Trump was no longer president.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/25/politics/emoluments-supreme-court-donald-trump-case/index.html |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Supreme Court dismisses emoluments cases against Trump|first1=Ariane|last1=de Vogue|first2=Devan|last2=Cole |work=CNN|date=January 25, 2021}}</ref>
After Trump took office, the [[watchdog group]] [[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]], represented by a number of constitutional scholars, sued him<ref name="Riback">{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/23/why-trumps-business-conflicts-cant-and-wont-just-be-swept-aside-commentary.html |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Why Trump's business conflicts can't – and won't – just be swept aside|first=Chris|last=Riback|date=January 23, 2017|work=[[CNBC]]}}</ref> for violations of the [[Foreign Emoluments Clause]] (a [[United States Constitution|constitutional]] provision that bars the president or any other federal official from taking gifts or payments from foreign governments), because his hotels and other businesses accept payment from foreign governments.<ref name="Riback" /><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/liberal-watchdog-group-sues-trump-alleging-he-violated-constitutional-ban/2017/01/22/5e8b35c2-e113-11e6-a547-5fb9411d332c_story.html |access-date=November 7, 2021|title=Liberal watchdog group sues Trump, alleging he violated constitutional ban|first1=David A.|last1=Fahrenthold|author1-link=David Fahrenthold|first2=Jonathan|last2=O'Connell|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=January 23, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first1=David A.|last1=Fahrenthold|author1-link=David Fahrenthold|first2=Jonathan|last2=O'Connell|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/what-is-the-emoluments-clause-does-it-apply-to-president-trump/2017/01/23/12aa7808-e185-11e6-a547-5fb9411d332c_story.html |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=What is the 'Emoluments Clause'? Does it apply to President Trump?|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=January 23, 2017}}</ref> CREW separately filed a complaint with the [[General Services Administration]] (GSA) over [[Trump International Hotel Washington, D.C.]]; the 2013 lease that Trump and the GSA signed "explicitly forbids any elected government official from holding the lease or benefiting from it".<ref name="Horowitz">{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Julia |last=Horowitz |url=https://money.cnn.com/2017/01/20/news/trump-conflicts-inauguration/ |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=President Trump hit immediately with ethics complaint |work=CNN |date=January 20, 2017}}</ref> The GSA said it was "reviewing the situation".<ref name="Horowitz" /> By May 2017, the ''[[CREW v. Trump]]'' lawsuit had grown with additional plaintiffs and alleged violations of the [[Domestic Emoluments Clause]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/us/politics/trump-crew-lawsuit-constitution.html |title=Watchdog Group Expands Lawsuit Against Trump |date=April 18, 2017|last=LaFraniere|first=Sharon |newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=June 11, 2017}}</ref> In June 2017, attorneys from the Department of Justice filed a motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that the plaintiffs had no right to sue<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/06/09/532302106/trump-administration-calls-for-lawsuit-about-his-businesses-to-be-dismissed|title=Trump Administration Calls For Lawsuit About His Businesses To Be Dismissed|first=Marilyn|last=Geewax|date=June 9, 2017|access-date=June 10, 2017|work=[[NPR]]}}</ref> and that the described conduct was not illegal.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-emoluments-foreign-government-payments-2017-6 |title=Justice Department argues it's fine for Trump to take payments from foreign governments, citing George Washington |website=Business Insider |date=June 10, 2017 |access-date=June 10, 2017 |first=Allan |last=Smith}}</ref> Also in June 2017, two more lawsuits were filed based on the [[Foreign Emoluments Clause]]: ''[[D.C. and Maryland v. Trump]]'',<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=LaFrainere|first=Sharon|title=Maryland and D.C. Sue Trump Over His Private Businesses|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/12/us/trump-lawsuit-private-businesses.html|access-date=June 12, 2017|newspaper=The New York Times|date=June 12, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Davis|first=Aaron C.|title=D.C. and Maryland sue President Trump, alleging breach of constitutional oath|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-and-maryland-to-sue-president-trump-alleging-breach-of-constitutional-oath/2017/06/11/0059e1f0-4f19-11e7-91eb-9611861a988f_story.html|access-date=June 12, 2017|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=June 12, 2017}}</ref> and ''[[Blumenthal v. Trump]]'', which was signed by more than one-third of the voting members of [[United States Congress|Congress]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Bykowicz|first=Julie|title=Democrats in Congress are the latest to sue President Trump|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/06/13/democrats-congress-are-latest-sue-president-trump/1tG7Mqk5tO4kxjHDh94ABO/story.html|access-date=June 14, 2017|agency=Associated Press|newspaper=[[Boston Globe]]|date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=June 14, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170614054544/http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/06/13/democrats-congress-are-latest-sue-president-trump/1tG7Mqk5tO4kxjHDh94ABO/story.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[United States District Judge]] [[George B. Daniels]] dismissed the CREW case on December 21, 2017, holding that plaintiffs lacked [[Standing (law)|standing]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/judge-dismisses-lawsuit-alleging-trump-violated-constitution/2017/12/21/31011510-e697-11e7-ab50-621fe0588340_story.html |first1=David A. |last1=Fahrenthold |first2=Jonathan |last2=O'Connell |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Judge dismisses lawsuit alleging Trump violated Constitution|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=December 21, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/EmolumentsDismissal.pdf |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Trump |quote=17 Civ. 458 |publisher=S.D.N.Y. |date=December 21, 2017 |via=courthousenews.com}}</ref> ''D.C. and Maryland v. Trump'' cleared three judicial hurdles to proceed to the [[Discovery (law)|discovery]] phase during 2018,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/28/us/trump-emoluments-lawsuit.html|title=Lawsuit Over Trump's Ties to His Businesses Is Allowed to Advance|first=Sharon|last=LaFraniere|date=March 28, 2018|newspaper=The New York Times |access-date=January 3, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/25/us/politics/trump-emoluments-lawsuit.html|title=In Ruling Against Trump, Judge Defines Anticorruption Clauses in Constitution for First Time|first=Sharon|last=LaFraniere|date=July 25, 2018|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=January 3, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/02/us/politics/trump-emoluments-lawsuit-evidence.html|title=Judge Orders Evidence to Be Gathered in Emoluments Case Against Trump|first=Sharon|last=LaFraniere|date=November 2, 2018|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=January 3, 2019}}</ref> with prosecutors issuing 38 subpoenas to Trump's businesses and cabinet departments in December before the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit|Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals]] issued a [[Stay of proceedings|stay]] days later at the behest of the Justice Department, pending hearings in March 2019.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-attorneys-general-subpoena-trump-irs-20181204-story.html|title=2 attorneys general issue subpoenas to Trump entities in Washington hotel case|first1=Jonathan |last1=O'Connell |first2=Ann E. |last2=Marimow |date=December 4, 2018 |first3=David A. |last3=Fahrenthold |newspaper=[[Chicago Tribune]] |access-date=January 4, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/17/us/politics/justice-department-trump-emoluments.html|title=Justice Department Asks Court to Halt Emoluments Case Against Trump|first=Sharon|last=LaFraniere|date=December 17, 2018|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=January 4, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-emoluments-idUSKCN1OJ30R |first=Jan |last=Wolfe |title=U.S. appeals court grants Trump request for halt to emoluments case|date=December 21, 2018|work=Reuters|access-date=January 3, 2019}}</ref> NBC News reported that by June 2019 representatives of 22 governments had spent money at Trump properties.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/reps-22-foreign-governments-have-spent-money-trump-properties-n1015806 |access-date=November 7, 2021 |date=June 12, 2019 |first1=Shelby |last1=Hanssen |first2=Ken |last2=Dilanian |title=Reps of 22 foreign governments have spent money at Trump properties|website=[[NBC News]]}}</ref> In January 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuits as Trump was no longer president.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/25/politics/emoluments-supreme-court-donald-trump-case/index.html |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Supreme Court dismisses emoluments cases against Trump|first1=Ariane|last1=de Vogue|first2=Devan|last2=Cole |work=CNN|date=January 25, 2021}}</ref>
Line 771: Line 771:
Trump fired, demoted, or withdrew nominations of numerous government officials in retaliation for actions that projected negatively on his public image or harmed his personal or political interests, including Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director [[Dismissal of James Comey|James Comey]],<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=James Comey's Attacks on Trump May Hurt a Carefully Cultivated Image |access-date=November 7, 2021 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/16/us/politics/james-comey-trump-book.html |first1=Julie Hirschfeld |last1=Davis |first2=Jonathan |last2=Martin |work=The New York Times|date=April 16, 2018}}</ref> Deputy FBI Director [[Andrew McCabe]], U.S. Attorney General [[Jeff Sessions]],<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Baker|first1=Peter|last2=Benner|first2=Katie|last3=Shear|first3=Michael D.|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/07/us/politics/sessions-resigns.html|title=Jeff Sessions Is Forced Out as Attorney General as Trump Installs Loyalist|date=November 7, 2018|work=The New York Times|access-date=April 25, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> and Director of National Intelligence [[Joseph Maguire]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||author=Editorial Board |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-is-trumps-vilest-act-of-retribution-yet/2020/04/06/c685cb0a-781f-11ea-b6ff-597f170df8f8_story.html|title=This is Trump's vilest act of retribution yet|date=April 7, 2020|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=April 25, 2020}}</ref>
Trump fired, demoted, or withdrew nominations of numerous government officials in retaliation for actions that projected negatively on his public image or harmed his personal or political interests, including Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director [[Dismissal of James Comey|James Comey]],<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=James Comey's Attacks on Trump May Hurt a Carefully Cultivated Image |access-date=November 7, 2021 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/16/us/politics/james-comey-trump-book.html |first1=Julie Hirschfeld |last1=Davis |first2=Jonathan |last2=Martin |work=The New York Times|date=April 16, 2018}}</ref> Deputy FBI Director [[Andrew McCabe]], U.S. Attorney General [[Jeff Sessions]],<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Baker|first1=Peter|last2=Benner|first2=Katie|last3=Shear|first3=Michael D.|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/07/us/politics/sessions-resigns.html|title=Jeff Sessions Is Forced Out as Attorney General as Trump Installs Loyalist|date=November 7, 2018|work=The New York Times|access-date=April 25, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> and Director of National Intelligence [[Joseph Maguire]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||author=Editorial Board |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-is-trumps-vilest-act-of-retribution-yet/2020/04/06/c685cb0a-781f-11ea-b6ff-597f170df8f8_story.html|title=This is Trump's vilest act of retribution yet|date=April 7, 2020|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=April 25, 2020}}</ref>


In December 2020, shortly before Christmas and in his last month in office, Trump granted 26 people full pardons and commuted the sentences of three others convicted of federal crimes. Those who benefitted included his former campaign advisor Paul Manafort, advisor and personal friend Roger Stone and Charles Kushner, father of Trump's son-in-law and confidant Jared Kushner.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump pardons Paul Manafort, Roger Stone and Charles Kushner |work=[[BBC News]] |date=December 24, 2020 |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55433522 |access-date=March 9, 2021}}</ref> In the final hours of his presidency, [[Donald Trump]] pardoned nearly 74 people, including rappers, financiers, and former members of congress. Those pardoned include his former senior adviser [[Steve Bannon]], [[Jared Kushner]]'s friend charged with cyberstalking, [[Ken Kurson]]; a real estate lawyer, Albert Pirro; and rappers prosecuted on federal weapons offenses, [[Lil Wayne]] and [[Kodak Black]]. Trump also pardoned his former fundraiser [[Elliott Broidy]], who worked for China, the [[UAE]], and [[Russia]] at the White House. Broidy also lobbied the US government to end the investigations in the [[1MDB scandal]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/20/donald-trump-pardons-steve-bannon-amid-last-acts-of-presidency-report |first1=Martin |last1=Pengelly |first2=Julian |last2=Borger |title=Donald Trump pardons Steve Bannon amid last acts of presidency|access-date=January 20, 2021|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=January 20, 2021}}</ref>
In December 2020, shortly before Christmas and in his last month in office, Trump granted 26 people full pardons and commuted the sentences of three others convicted of federal crimes. Those who benefitted included his former campaign advisor Paul Manafort, advisor and personal friend Roger Stone and Charles Kushner, father of Trump's son-in-law and confidant Jared Kushner.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||title=Trump pardons Paul Manafort, Roger Stone and Charles Kushner |work=[[BBC News]] |date=December 24, 2020 |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55433522 |access-date=March 9, 2021}}</ref> In the final hours of his presidency, [[Donald Trump]] pardoned nearly 74 people, including rappers, financiers, and former members of congress. Those pardoned include his former senior adviser [[Steve Bannon]], [[Jared Kushner]]'s friend charged with cyberstalking, [[Ken Kurson]]; a real estate lawyer, Albert Pirro; and rappers prosecuted on federal weapons offenses, [[Lil Wayne]] and [[Kodak Black]]. Trump also pardoned his former fundraiser [[Elliott Broidy]], who worked for China, the [[UAE]], and [[Russia]] at the White House. Broidy also lobbied the US government to end the investigations in the [[1MDB scandal]].<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/20/donald-trump-pardons-steve-bannon-amid-last-acts-of-presidency-report |first1=Martin |last1=Pengelly |first2=Julian |last2=Borger |title=Donald Trump pardons Steve Bannon amid last acts of presidency|access-date=January 20, 2021|website=The Guardian|date=January 20, 2021}}</ref>


According to several reports, Trump's and his family's trips in the first month of his presidency cost U.S. taxpayers nearly as much as President Obama's travel expenses for an entire year. When Obama was president, Trump frequently criticized him for taking vacations which were paid for with public funds.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-costs-trips-security-taxpayer-barack-obama-month-year-a7586261.html |access-date=November 7, 2021 |first=Peter |last=Walker |title=In a month, the Trump family has cost taxpayers almost as much as the Obamas did in a year|date=February 17, 2017|newspaper=[[The Independent]]}}</ref> ''The Washington Post'' reported that Trump's atypically lavish lifestyle is far more expensive to the taxpayers than what was typical of previous presidents and could end up in the hundreds of millions of dollars over the whole of Trump's term.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/trump-familys-elaborate-lifestyle-a-logistical-nightmare--at-taxpayer-expense/2017/02/16/763cce8e-f2ce-11e6-a9b0-ecee7ce475fc_story.html |first1=Drew |last1=Harwell |first2=Amy |last2=Brittain |first3=Jonathan |last3=O'Connell |date=February 16, 2017 |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Trump family's elaborate lifestyle is a 'logistical nightmare' – at taxpayer expense|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref>
According to several reports, Trump's and his family's trips in the first month of his presidency cost U.S. taxpayers nearly as much as President Obama's travel expenses for an entire year. When Obama was president, Trump frequently criticized him for taking vacations which were paid for with public funds.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-costs-trips-security-taxpayer-barack-obama-month-year-a7586261.html |access-date=November 7, 2021 |first=Peter |last=Walker |title=In a month, the Trump family has cost taxpayers almost as much as the Obamas did in a year|date=February 17, 2017|newspaper=[[The Independent]]}}</ref> ''The Washington Post'' reported that Trump's atypically lavish lifestyle is far more expensive to the taxpayers than what was typical of previous presidents and could end up in the hundreds of millions of dollars over the whole of Trump's term.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/trump-familys-elaborate-lifestyle-a-logistical-nightmare--at-taxpayer-expense/2017/02/16/763cce8e-f2ce-11e6-a9b0-ecee7ce475fc_story.html |first1=Drew |last1=Harwell |first2=Amy |last2=Brittain |first3=Jonathan |last3=O'Connell |date=February 16, 2017 |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Trump family's elaborate lifestyle is a 'logistical nightmare' – at taxpayer expense|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref>
Line 857: Line 857:
On January 6, 2021, rioters supporting Trump [[January 6 United States Capitol attack|stormed]] the [[United States Capitol|U.S. Capitol]] in an effort to thwart a [[joint session of Congress]] during which the [[United States Electoral College|Electoral College]] vote was to be certified, affirming the election of former vice president [[Joe Biden]] as president and Senator [[Kamala Harris]] as vice president.
On January 6, 2021, rioters supporting Trump [[January 6 United States Capitol attack|stormed]] the [[United States Capitol|U.S. Capitol]] in an effort to thwart a [[joint session of Congress]] during which the [[United States Electoral College|Electoral College]] vote was to be certified, affirming the election of former vice president [[Joe Biden]] as president and Senator [[Kamala Harris]] as vice president.


During an initial rally earlier that morning, Trump encouraged his supporters to march to the U.S. Capitol.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2021/jan/06/georgia-election-latest-news-senate-ossoff-warnock-democrats-republicans-trump-biden|title=Schumer calls pro-Trump mob 'domestic terrorists' as Senate resumes election certification{{snd}}live|last1=McCarthy|first1=Tom|last2=Ho|first2=Vivian|last3=Greve|first3=Joan E.|date=January 7, 2021|newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=January 6, 2021|archive-date=January 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210106230506/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2021/jan/06/georgia-election-latest-news-senate-ossoff-warnock-democrats-republicans-trump-biden|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Blake|first=Aaron|title=Analysis {{!}} 'Let's have trial by combat': How Trump and allies egged on the violent scenes Wednesday|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/06/lets-have-trial-by-combat-how-trump-allies-egged-violent-scenes-wednesday/ |date=January 6, 2021 |access-date=January 7, 2021|issn=0190-8286|archive-date=January 7, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107013645/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/06/lets-have-trial-by-combat-how-trump-allies-egged-violent-scenes-wednesday/|url-status=live}}</ref> Subsequently, pro-Trump attendees marched to the Capitol building, joined other protesters, and stormed the building.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||first1=Ted|last1=Barrett|first2=Manu|last2=Raju|first3=Peter|last3=Nickeas|title=Pro-Trump mob storms US Capitol as armed standoff takes place outside House chamber|url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/06/politics/us-capitol-lockdown/index.html |date=January 7, 2021 |access-date=January 6, 2021|website=CNN|archive-date=January 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210106211203/https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/06/politics/us-capitol-lockdown/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Congress was in session at the time, conducting the [[2021 United States Electoral College vote count|Electoral College vote count]] and debating the results of the vote. As the protesters arrived, Capitol security evacuated the Senate and House of Representatives chambers and locked down several other buildings on the Capitol campus.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/06/buildings-in-us-capitol-complex-evacuated-amid-pro-trump-protests.html|title=U.S. Capitol secured hours after pro-Trump rioters invade Congress|first=Amanda Macias, Dan|last=Mangan|date=January 6, 2021|website=CNBC|access-date=January 7, 2021|archive-date=January 7, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107030000/https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/06/buildings-in-us-capitol-complex-evacuated-amid-pro-trump-protests.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Later that evening, after the Capitol was secured, Congress went back into session to discuss the Electoral College vote, finally affirming at 3:41{{spaces}}a.m. that Biden had won the election.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=King, Ledyard |last2=Groppe, Maureen |last3=Wu, Nicholas |last4=Jansen, Bart |last5=Subramanian, Courtney |last6=Garrison, Joey |date=January 6, 2021 |title=Pence confirms Biden as winner, officially ending electoral count after day of violence at Capitol |work=[[USA Today]] |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/01/06/congress-count-electoral-college-votes-biden-win/6556555002/ |url-status=live |access-date=January 7, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107100543/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/01/06/congress-count-electoral-college-votes-biden-win/6556555002/ |archive-date=January 7, 2021}}</ref>
During an initial rally earlier that morning, Trump encouraged his supporters to march to the U.S. Capitol.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2021/jan/06/georgia-election-latest-news-senate-ossoff-warnock-democrats-republicans-trump-biden|title=Schumer calls pro-Trump mob 'domestic terrorists' as Senate resumes election certification{{snd}}live|last1=McCarthy|first1=Tom|last2=Ho|first2=Vivian|last3=Greve|first3=Joan E.|date=January 7, 2021|newspaper=The Guardian |access-date=January 6, 2021|archive-date=January 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210106230506/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2021/jan/06/georgia-election-latest-news-senate-ossoff-warnock-democrats-republicans-trump-biden|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Blake|first=Aaron|title=Analysis {{!}} 'Let's have trial by combat': How Trump and allies egged on the violent scenes Wednesday|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/06/lets-have-trial-by-combat-how-trump-allies-egged-violent-scenes-wednesday/ |date=January 6, 2021 |access-date=January 7, 2021|issn=0190-8286|archive-date=January 7, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107013645/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/06/lets-have-trial-by-combat-how-trump-allies-egged-violent-scenes-wednesday/|url-status=live}}</ref> Subsequently, pro-Trump attendees marched to the Capitol building, joined other protesters, and stormed the building.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||first1=Ted|last1=Barrett|first2=Manu|last2=Raju|first3=Peter|last3=Nickeas|title=Pro-Trump mob storms US Capitol as armed standoff takes place outside House chamber|url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/06/politics/us-capitol-lockdown/index.html |date=January 7, 2021 |access-date=January 6, 2021|website=CNN|archive-date=January 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210106211203/https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/06/politics/us-capitol-lockdown/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Congress was in session at the time, conducting the [[2021 United States Electoral College vote count|Electoral College vote count]] and debating the results of the vote. As the protesters arrived, Capitol security evacuated the Senate and House of Representatives chambers and locked down several other buildings on the Capitol campus.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/06/buildings-in-us-capitol-complex-evacuated-amid-pro-trump-protests.html|title=U.S. Capitol secured hours after pro-Trump rioters invade Congress|first=Amanda Macias, Dan|last=Mangan|date=January 6, 2021|website=CNBC|access-date=January 7, 2021|archive-date=January 7, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107030000/https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/06/buildings-in-us-capitol-complex-evacuated-amid-pro-trump-protests.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Later that evening, after the Capitol was secured, Congress went back into session to discuss the Electoral College vote, finally affirming at 3:41{{spaces}}a.m. that Biden had won the election.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=King, Ledyard |last2=Groppe, Maureen |last3=Wu, Nicholas |last4=Jansen, Bart |last5=Subramanian, Courtney |last6=Garrison, Joey |date=January 6, 2021 |title=Pence confirms Biden as winner, officially ending electoral count after day of violence at Capitol |work=USA Today |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/01/06/congress-count-electoral-college-votes-biden-win/6556555002/ |url-status=live |access-date=January 7, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107100543/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/01/06/congress-count-electoral-college-votes-biden-win/6556555002/ |archive-date=January 7, 2021}}</ref>


Five casualties occurred during the event: one Capitol Police officer, and four stormers or protesters at the Capitol, including one rioter shot by police inside the building.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Safdar |first1=Khadeeja |last2=Ailworth |first2=Erin |last3=Seetharaman |first3=Deepa |date=January 8, 2021 |title=Police Identify Five Dead After Capitol Riot |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/police-identify-those-killed-in-capitol-riot-11610133560 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210112023512/https://www.wsj.com/articles/police-identify-those-killed-in-capitol-riot-11610133560 |archive-date=January 12, 2021 |access-date=January 24, 2021 |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal}}</ref> At least 138 police officers were injured.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Schmidt |first1=Michael S. |last2=Broadwater |first2=Luke |title=Officers' Injuries, Including Concussions, Show Scope of Violence at Capitol Riot |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/us/politics/capitol-riot-police-officer-injuries.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20211228/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/us/politics/capitol-riot-police-officer-injuries.html |archive-date=December 28, 2021 |url-access=limited |access-date=February 12, 2021 |work=The New York Times |date=February 12, 2021}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Three [[improvised explosive device]]s were reported to have been found: one each on Capitol grounds, at the [[Republican National Committee]] and [[Democratic National Committee]] offices.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Shallwani|first=Pervaiz|date=January 6, 2021|title=At least two real explosive devices in DC rendered safe by law enforcement|work=CNN|url=https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/congress-electoral-college-vote-count-2021/h_a8427f16f5c09d46e0dcff011e3d48c0|url-status=live|access-date=January 6, 2021|archive-date=January 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210106224546/https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/congress-electoral-college-vote-count-2021/h_a8427f16f5c09d46e0dcff011e3d48c0}}</ref>
Five casualties occurred during the event: one Capitol Police officer, and four stormers or protesters at the Capitol, including one rioter shot by police inside the building.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Safdar |first1=Khadeeja |last2=Ailworth |first2=Erin |last3=Seetharaman |first3=Deepa |date=January 8, 2021 |title=Police Identify Five Dead After Capitol Riot |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/police-identify-those-killed-in-capitol-riot-11610133560 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210112023512/https://www.wsj.com/articles/police-identify-those-killed-in-capitol-riot-11610133560 |archive-date=January 12, 2021 |access-date=January 24, 2021 |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal}}</ref> At least 138 police officers were injured.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Schmidt |first1=Michael S. |last2=Broadwater |first2=Luke |title=Officers' Injuries, Including Concussions, Show Scope of Violence at Capitol Riot |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/us/politics/capitol-riot-police-officer-injuries.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20211228/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/us/politics/capitol-riot-police-officer-injuries.html |archive-date=December 28, 2021 |url-access=limited |access-date=February 12, 2021 |work=The New York Times |date=February 12, 2021}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Three [[improvised explosive device]]s were reported to have been found: one each on Capitol grounds, at the [[Republican National Committee]] and [[Democratic National Committee]] offices.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Shallwani|first=Pervaiz|date=January 6, 2021|title=At least two real explosive devices in DC rendered safe by law enforcement|work=CNN|url=https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/congress-electoral-college-vote-count-2021/h_a8427f16f5c09d46e0dcff011e3d48c0|url-status=live|access-date=January 6, 2021|archive-date=January 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210106224546/https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/congress-electoral-college-vote-count-2021/h_a8427f16f5c09d46e0dcff011e3d48c0}}</ref>
Line 867: Line 867:
On January 7, the day after the Electoral College results were certified by Congress, Trump tweeted a video in which he stated, "A new administration will be inaugurated on January 20th. My focus now turns to ensuring a smooth, orderly and seamless transition of power."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Knowles|first=David|date=January 7, 2021|title=Trump finally admits defeat: 'A new administration will be inaugurated on January 20'|url=https://news.yahoo.com/trump-finally-admits-defeat-a-new-administration-will-be-inaugurated-on-january-20-011501284.html|access-date=January 8, 2021|website=[[Yahoo! News]]}}</ref> The [[State Department]] subsequently told diplomats to affirm Biden's victory.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||access-date=November 7, 2021 |url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/07/politics/state-department-social-media-biden/index.html|title=State Department tells diplomats to affirm Biden's victory after Capitol riot|first1=Kylie|last1=Atwood|first2=Jennifer|last2=Hansler|website=CNN |date=January 7, 2021}}</ref>
On January 7, the day after the Electoral College results were certified by Congress, Trump tweeted a video in which he stated, "A new administration will be inaugurated on January 20th. My focus now turns to ensuring a smooth, orderly and seamless transition of power."<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last=Knowles|first=David|date=January 7, 2021|title=Trump finally admits defeat: 'A new administration will be inaugurated on January 20'|url=https://news.yahoo.com/trump-finally-admits-defeat-a-new-administration-will-be-inaugurated-on-january-20-011501284.html|access-date=January 8, 2021|website=[[Yahoo! News]]}}</ref> The [[State Department]] subsequently told diplomats to affirm Biden's victory.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||access-date=November 7, 2021 |url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/07/politics/state-department-social-media-biden/index.html|title=State Department tells diplomats to affirm Biden's victory after Capitol riot|first1=Kylie|last1=Atwood|first2=Jennifer|last2=Hansler|website=CNN |date=January 7, 2021}}</ref>


On January 12, the House voted in favor of requesting that the vice president remove Trump from office per the [[Twenty-fifth Amendment]]; hours earlier, Pence had indicated that he opposed such a measure.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Gambino|first=Lauren|date=January 13, 2021|title=Stage set for impeachment after Pence dismisses House call to invoke 25th amendment|work=[[The Guardian]]|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/12/house-vote-resolution-pence-invoke-25th-amendment-remove-trump|access-date=January 13, 2021|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> The next day, the House voted 232–197 to [[Second impeachment of Donald Trump|impeach Trump]] on a charge of "incitement of insurrection". Ten Republican representatives joined all Democratic representatives in voting to impeach Trump. Trump is the first and only president to be impeached twice.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Wagner|first1=Meg|last2=Macaya|first2=Melissa|last3=Hayes|first3=Mike|display-authors=etal|date=January 13, 2021|title=House votes on Trump impeachment|url=https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/house-trump-impeachment-vote-01-13-21/|access-date=January 13, 2021|website=CNN}}</ref> On February 13, the Senate voted 57–43 to [[Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump|convict Trump]] on a charge of inciting insurrection, ten votes short of the required two-thirds majority, and he was acquitted. Seven Republican senators joined all Democratic and independent senators in voting to convict Trump.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Fandos|first1=Nicholas|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/13/us/politics/trump-impeachment.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20211228/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/13/us/politics/trump-impeachment.html |archive-date=December 28, 2021 |url-access=limited |access-date=November 7, 2021 |newspaper=The New York Times |date=February 13, 2021|title=Trump Acquitted of Inciting Insurrection, Even as Bipartisan Majority Votes 'Guilty'}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-us-canada-56054136|title=Donald Trump impeachment trial: Ex-president acquitted of inciting insurrection|website=[[BBC News]] |access-date=February 14, 2021|archive-date=February 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210214225754/https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-us-canada-56054136|url-status=live}}</ref>
On January 12, the House voted in favor of requesting that the vice president remove Trump from office per the [[Twenty-fifth Amendment]]; hours earlier, Pence had indicated that he opposed such a measure.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last=Gambino|first=Lauren|date=January 13, 2021|title=Stage set for impeachment after Pence dismisses House call to invoke 25th amendment|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/12/house-vote-resolution-pence-invoke-25th-amendment-remove-trump|access-date=January 13, 2021|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> The next day, the House voted 232–197 to [[Second impeachment of Donald Trump|impeach Trump]] on a charge of "incitement of insurrection". Ten Republican representatives joined all Democratic representatives in voting to impeach Trump. Trump is the first and only president to be impeached twice.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Wagner|first1=Meg|last2=Macaya|first2=Melissa|last3=Hayes|first3=Mike|display-authors=etal|date=January 13, 2021|title=House votes on Trump impeachment|url=https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/house-trump-impeachment-vote-01-13-21/|access-date=January 13, 2021|website=CNN}}</ref> On February 13, the Senate voted 57–43 to [[Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump|convict Trump]] on a charge of inciting insurrection, ten votes short of the required two-thirds majority, and he was acquitted. Seven Republican senators joined all Democratic and independent senators in voting to convict Trump.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Fandos|first1=Nicholas|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/13/us/politics/trump-impeachment.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20211228/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/13/us/politics/trump-impeachment.html |archive-date=December 28, 2021 |url-access=limited |access-date=November 7, 2021 |newspaper=The New York Times |date=February 13, 2021|title=Trump Acquitted of Inciting Insurrection, Even as Bipartisan Majority Votes 'Guilty'}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-us-canada-56054136|title=Donald Trump impeachment trial: Ex-president acquitted of inciting insurrection|website=[[BBC News]] |access-date=February 14, 2021|archive-date=February 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210214225754/https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-us-canada-56054136|url-status=live}}</ref>
[[File:Farewell Address of President Donald J. Trump (2021).webm|thumb|President Trump's first farewell address on January 19, 2021]]
[[File:Farewell Address of President Donald J. Trump (2021).webm|thumb|President Trump's first farewell address on January 19, 2021]]
Trump gave a [[Donald Trump's first farewell address|first farewell address]] the day prior to the [[inauguration of Joe Biden]]. In it he stressed his economic and foreign policy record, and said the country can never tolerate "[[political violence]]".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/19/trump-stresses-economy-foreign-policy-farewell-address-nation/4217614001/|title=Farewell address: Trump stresses record, condemns Capitol riot, does not name Biden|last1=Jackson|first1=David|last2=Collins|first2=Michael|date=January 19, 2021|work=[[USA Today]]|access-date=March 29, 2021}}</ref> Trump did not attend Biden's inauguration, becoming the first departing president in 152 years to refuse to attend his elected successor's inauguration,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/19/us/politics/presidents-who-skipped-inaugurations.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20211228/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/19/us/politics/presidents-who-skipped-inaugurations.html |archive-date=December 28, 2021 |url-access=limited |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Trump Is Not the First President to Snub an Inauguration|newspaper=The New York Times|date=January 20, 2021|first=Jacey|last=Fortin}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Joey|last=Garrison|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/01/08/trump-first-outgoing-president-skip-inauguration-152-years/6596286002/ |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=A president hasn't refused to attend the inauguration of his successor in 152 years. Donald Trump will change that|newspaper=[[USA Today]]|date=January 8, 2021}}</ref> but he did honor another tradition by leaving Biden a letter on the [[Resolute desk|''Resolute'' desk]] in the White House.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||access-date=November 7, 2021 |url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-farewell-address-nation/ |date=January 19, 2021 |title=Remarks by President Trump In Farewell Address to the Nation |website=trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Jackson|first1=David|last2=Fritze|first2=John|date=January 20, 2021|title=Donald Trump leaves letter for Joe Biden ahead of inauguration|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/20/donald-trump-leaves-letter-joe-biden-inauguration-day/4228139001/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210120152944/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/20/donald-trump-leaves-letter-joe-biden-inauguration-day/4228139001/|archive-date=January 20, 2021|access-date=January 20, 2021|website=[[USA Today]]}}</ref>
Trump gave a [[Donald Trump's first farewell address|first farewell address]] the day prior to the [[inauguration of Joe Biden]]. In it he stressed his economic and foreign policy record, and said the country can never tolerate "[[political violence]]".<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/19/trump-stresses-economy-foreign-policy-farewell-address-nation/4217614001/|title=Farewell address: Trump stresses record, condemns Capitol riot, does not name Biden|last1=Jackson|first1=David|last2=Collins|first2=Michael|date=January 19, 2021|work=USA Today|access-date=March 29, 2021}}</ref> Trump did not attend Biden's inauguration, becoming the first departing president in 152 years to refuse to attend his elected successor's inauguration,<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/19/us/politics/presidents-who-skipped-inaugurations.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20211228/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/19/us/politics/presidents-who-skipped-inaugurations.html |archive-date=December 28, 2021 |url-access=limited |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=Trump Is Not the First President to Snub an Inauguration|newspaper=The New York Times|date=January 20, 2021|first=Jacey|last=Fortin}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||first=Joey|last=Garrison|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/01/08/trump-first-outgoing-president-skip-inauguration-152-years/6596286002/ |access-date=November 7, 2021 |title=A president hasn't refused to attend the inauguration of his successor in 152 years. Donald Trump will change that|newspaper=USA Today|date=January 8, 2021}}</ref> but he did honor another tradition by leaving Biden a letter on the [[Resolute desk|''Resolute'' desk]] in the White House.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||access-date=November 7, 2021 |url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-farewell-address-nation/ |date=January 19, 2021 |title=Remarks by President Trump In Farewell Address to the Nation |website=trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov}}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:Cite web||last1=Jackson|first1=David|last2=Fritze|first2=John|date=January 20, 2021|title=Donald Trump leaves letter for Joe Biden ahead of inauguration|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/20/donald-trump-leaves-letter-joe-biden-inauguration-day/4228139001/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210120152944/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/20/donald-trump-leaves-letter-joe-biden-inauguration-day/4228139001/|archive-date=January 20, 2021|access-date=January 20, 2021|website=USA Today}}</ref>


== Historical evaluations and public opinion ==
== Historical evaluations and public opinion ==
Line 876: Line 876:
{{Main|Historical rankings of presidents of the United States#2018–present|}}
{{Main|Historical rankings of presidents of the United States#2018–present|}}


In the 2018 presidential rankings by the Siena College Research Institute, Trump ranked as the third-worst president in history.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Cummings |first1=William |title=Survey of scholars places Trump as third worst president of all time |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2019/02/13/siena-presidential-ranking-survey/2857075002/ |access-date=October 19, 2021 |work=[[USA Today]] |date=February 13, 2019}}</ref> [[C-SPAN]]'s 2021 President Historians Survey ranked Trump as the fourth-worst president overall and the worst in the leadership characteristics of Moral Authority and [[Hiring and personnel concerns about Donald Trump|Administrative Skills]]. Trump's best rated leadership characteristic was Public Persuasion, where he ranked 32nd out of the 44 presidents.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Choi |first1=Joseph |title= Trump ranked fourth from worst in C-SPAN's 2021 presidential rankings |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/media/560926-trump-ranked-fourth-from-worst-in-c-spans-2021-presidential-rankings |access-date=July 1, 2021 |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]] |date=June 30, 2021}}</ref> Trump ranked last in both the 2018 and 2024 surveys of the [[American Political Science Association]] Presidents and Executive Politics section, with self-identified Republican historians ranking Trump in their bottom five presidents.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chappell |first=Bill |date=February 19, 2024 |title=In historians' Presidents Day survey, Biden vs. Trump is not a close call |url=https://www.npr.org/2024/02/19/1232447088/historians-presidents-survey-trump-last-biden-14th |work=NPR}}</ref>
In the 2018 presidential rankings by the Siena College Research Institute, Trump ranked as the third-worst president in history.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Cummings |first1=William |title=Survey of scholars places Trump as third worst president of all time |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2019/02/13/siena-presidential-ranking-survey/2857075002/ |access-date=October 19, 2021 |work=USA Today |date=February 13, 2019}}</ref> [[C-SPAN]]'s 2021 President Historians Survey ranked Trump as the fourth-worst president overall and the worst in the leadership characteristics of Moral Authority and [[Hiring and personnel concerns about Donald Trump|Administrative Skills]]. Trump's best rated leadership characteristic was Public Persuasion, where he ranked 32nd out of the 44 presidents.<ref>{{#invoke:Cite news||last1=Choi |first1=Joseph |title= Trump ranked fourth from worst in C-SPAN's 2021 presidential rankings |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/media/560926-trump-ranked-fourth-from-worst-in-c-spans-2021-presidential-rankings |access-date=July 1, 2021 |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]] |date=June 30, 2021}}</ref> Trump ranked last in both the 2018 and 2024 surveys of the [[American Political Science Association]] Presidents and Executive Politics section, with self-identified Republican historians ranking Trump in their bottom five presidents.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chappell |first=Bill |date=February 19, 2024 |title=In historians' Presidents Day survey, Biden vs. Trump is not a close call |url=https://www.npr.org/2024/02/19/1232447088/historians-presidents-survey-trump-last-biden-14th |work=NPR}}</ref>


=== Opinion polling ===
=== Opinion polling ===