Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "|ParentOrganization=U.S. Department of Labor" to "|ParentOrganization=Department of Labor |TopOrganization=Department of Labor"
m (Text replacement - "New York City" to "New York City")
m (Text replacement - "|ParentOrganization=U.S. Department of Labor" to "|ParentOrganization=Department of Labor |TopOrganization=Department of Labor")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
|OrganizationType=Executive Departments (Sub-organization)
|OrganizationType=Executive Departments (Sub-organization)
|Mission=OSHA's mission is to ensure safe and healthful working conditions for workers by setting and enforcing standards and by providing training, outreach, education, and assistance. It aims to prevent work-related injuries, illnesses, and deaths by promoting workplace safety and health.
|Mission=OSHA's mission is to ensure safe and healthful working conditions for workers by setting and enforcing standards and by providing training, outreach, education, and assistance. It aims to prevent work-related injuries, illnesses, and deaths by promoting workplace safety and health.
|ParentOrganization=U.S. Department of Labor
|ParentOrganization=Department of Labor
|TopOrganization=Department of Labor
|CreationLegislation=Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
|CreationLegislation=Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
|Employees=2100
|Employees=2100
Line 95: Line 96:


In 2000, OSHA issued an ergonomics standard. In March 2001, [[United States Congress|Congress]] voted to repeal the standard through the [[Congressional Review Act]]. The repeal, one of the first <!-- A reporting standard was blocked by Congressional Review Act in 2017:
In 2000, OSHA issued an ergonomics standard. In March 2001, [[United States Congress|Congress]] voted to repeal the standard through the [[Congressional Review Act]]. The repeal, one of the first <!-- A reporting standard was blocked by Congressional Review Act in 2017:
https://www.epi.org/perkins/congressional-review-act-resolution-to-block-the-department-of-labors-rule-titled-clarification-of-employers-continuing-obligation-to-make-and-maintain-an-accurate-record-o/ -->major pieces of legislation signed by President [[George W. Bush]], is the first instance that Congress has successfully used the Congressional Review Act to block regulation.
https://www.epi.org/perkins/congressional-review-act-resolution-to-block-the-department-of-labors-rule-titled-clarification-of-employers-continuing-obligation-to-make-and-maintain-an-accurate-record-o/ -->major pieces of legislation signed by President George W. Bush, is the first instance that Congress has successfully used the Congressional Review Act to block regulation.


Since 2001, OSHA has issued the following standards:
Since 2001, OSHA has issued the following standards:
Line 130: Line 131:
In 2020, the [[COVID-19]] pandemic caused about 1,300 workers and their families to contract the virus, with four deaths, at the [[Smithfield Foods]] packing plant in [[Sioux Falls, South Dakota]]. The governor, [[Kristi Noem]], resisted initiating and enforcing measures to protect workers and the community.<ref name=KC>[https://www.kansascity.com/news/coronavirus/article245633785.html After COVID-19 outbreak kills 4, Smithfield meat plant in South Dakota fined $13,494], ''[[Kansas City Star]]'', Chacour Koop, September 10, 2020. Retrieved September 13, 2020.</ref><ref>{{Cite news |first=Trevor J. |last=Mitchell |url=https://eu.argusleader.com/story/news/2020/05/04/south-dakota-confirms-37-more-cases-covid-19/3077130001 |title=Noem 'disappointed' Smithfield isn't sharing reopening plans |date=May 4, 2020 |newspaper=[[Argus Leader]] |language=en |access-date=September 13, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.ontariofarmer.com/news/farm-news/smithfield-plant-linked-to-600-covid-19-cases |title=Smithfield plant linked to 600 COVID-19 cases |date=April 17, 2020 |website=Ontario Farmer |publisher=Postmedia News |language=en-CA |access-date=September 13, 2020}}</ref> The plant was fined $13,494 – the maximum allowed at the time – by OSHA for what was considered a single violation.<ref name=KC/>
In 2020, the [[COVID-19]] pandemic caused about 1,300 workers and their families to contract the virus, with four deaths, at the [[Smithfield Foods]] packing plant in [[Sioux Falls, South Dakota]]. The governor, [[Kristi Noem]], resisted initiating and enforcing measures to protect workers and the community.<ref name=KC>[https://www.kansascity.com/news/coronavirus/article245633785.html After COVID-19 outbreak kills 4, Smithfield meat plant in South Dakota fined $13,494], ''[[Kansas City Star]]'', Chacour Koop, September 10, 2020. Retrieved September 13, 2020.</ref><ref>{{Cite news |first=Trevor J. |last=Mitchell |url=https://eu.argusleader.com/story/news/2020/05/04/south-dakota-confirms-37-more-cases-covid-19/3077130001 |title=Noem 'disappointed' Smithfield isn't sharing reopening plans |date=May 4, 2020 |newspaper=[[Argus Leader]] |language=en |access-date=September 13, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.ontariofarmer.com/news/farm-news/smithfield-plant-linked-to-600-covid-19-cases |title=Smithfield plant linked to 600 COVID-19 cases |date=April 17, 2020 |website=Ontario Farmer |publisher=Postmedia News |language=en-CA |access-date=September 13, 2020}}</ref> The plant was fined $13,494 – the maximum allowed at the time – by OSHA for what was considered a single violation.<ref name=KC/>


OSHA carries out its enforcement activities through its 10 regional offices and 85 area offices.<ref name="Commonly Used Statistics" /> OSHA's regional offices are located in Boston, New York City, [[Philadelphia]], [[Atlanta]], Chicago, [[Dallas]], [[Kansas City]], [[Denver]], San Francisco, and Seattle.
OSHA carries out its enforcement activities through its 10 regional offices and 85 area offices.<ref name="Commonly Used Statistics" /> OSHA's regional offices are located in Boston, New York City, Philadelphia, [[Atlanta]], Chicago, [[Dallas]], [[Kansas City]], [[Denver]], San Francisco, and Seattle.


==Record keeping requirements==
==Record keeping requirements==
Line 165: Line 166:
A ''New York Times'' investigation in 2003 showed that over the 20-year period from 1982 to 2002, 2,197 workers died in 1,242 incidents in which OSHA investigators concluded that employers had willfully violated workplace safety laws. In 93% of these fatality cases arising from wilful violation, OSHA made no referral to the [[U.S. Department of Justice]] for criminal prosecution.<ref name="Barstow">David Barstow, [https://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/22/us/us-rarely-seeks-charges-for-deaths-in-workplace.html?mcubz=1 U.S. Rarely Seeks Charges For Deaths in Workplace], ''New York Times'' (December 22, 2003).</ref> The ''Times'' investigation found that OSHA had failed to pursue prosecution "even when employers had been cited before for the very same safety violation" and even in cases where multiple workers died. In interviews, current and former OSHA officials said that the low rates of criminal enforcement were the result of "a bureaucracy that works at every level to thwart criminal referrals. ... that fails to reward, and sometimes penalizes, those who push too hard for prosecution" and that " aggressive enforcement [was] suffocated by endless layers of review.<ref name="Barstow"/>
A ''New York Times'' investigation in 2003 showed that over the 20-year period from 1982 to 2002, 2,197 workers died in 1,242 incidents in which OSHA investigators concluded that employers had willfully violated workplace safety laws. In 93% of these fatality cases arising from wilful violation, OSHA made no referral to the [[U.S. Department of Justice]] for criminal prosecution.<ref name="Barstow">David Barstow, [https://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/22/us/us-rarely-seeks-charges-for-deaths-in-workplace.html?mcubz=1 U.S. Rarely Seeks Charges For Deaths in Workplace], ''New York Times'' (December 22, 2003).</ref> The ''Times'' investigation found that OSHA had failed to pursue prosecution "even when employers had been cited before for the very same safety violation" and even in cases where multiple workers died. In interviews, current and former OSHA officials said that the low rates of criminal enforcement were the result of "a bureaucracy that works at every level to thwart criminal referrals. ... that fails to reward, and sometimes penalizes, those who push too hard for prosecution" and that " aggressive enforcement [was] suffocated by endless layers of review.<ref name="Barstow"/>


OSHA has also been criticized for taking too long to develop new regulations. For instance, speaking about OSHA under the [[George W. Bush]] presidency on the specific issue of combustible dust explosions, [[Chemical Safety Board]] appointee Carolyn Merritt said: "The basic disappointment has been this attitude of no new regulation. They don't want the industry to be pestered. In some instances, the industry has to be pestered in order to comply."<ref>{{cite news |first=Scott |last=Pelley |title=Is Enough Done To Stop Explosive Dust? |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-enough-done-to-stop-explosive-dust/ |work=60 Minutes |publisher=CBSnews.com |date=June 8, 2008 |access-date=June 9, 2008 }}</ref>
OSHA has also been criticized for taking too long to develop new regulations. For instance, speaking about OSHA under the George W. Bush presidency on the specific issue of combustible dust explosions, [[Chemical Safety Board]] appointee Carolyn Merritt said: "The basic disappointment has been this attitude of no new regulation. They don't want the industry to be pestered. In some instances, the industry has to be pestered in order to comply."<ref>{{cite news |first=Scott |last=Pelley |title=Is Enough Done To Stop Explosive Dust? |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-enough-done-to-stop-explosive-dust/ |work=60 Minutes |publisher=CBSnews.com |date=June 8, 2008 |access-date=June 9, 2008 }}</ref>


== Directors ==
== Directors ==