Center for Scientific Review: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{Organization" to "Catergory:Orgs {{Organization") Tag: Reverted |
m (Text replacement - "{{<span class="error">Expansion depth limit exceeded</span>" to "{{Organization") Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Catergory:Orgs]] | [[Catergory:Orgs]] | ||
{{ | {{Organization|OrganizationName=Center for Scientific Review | ||
|OrganizationType=Research and Development Agencies (Sub-organization) | |OrganizationType=Research and Development Agencies (Sub-organization) | ||
|Mission=CSR is the portal for NIH grant applications, managing the initial peer review of grant applications for scientific and technical merit, ensuring the scientific quality and relevance of the research NIH supports. | |Mission=CSR is the portal for NIH grant applications, managing the initial peer review of grant applications for scientific and technical merit, ensuring the scientific quality and relevance of the research NIH supports. | ||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{ | {{Organization}} | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* {{ | * {{Organization}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Organization}} | ||
<!-- June 2017 archive of https://public.csr.nih.gov/pages/default.aspx (presently https://public.csr.nih.gov/) : {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170602213233/https://public.csr.nih.gov/pages/default.aspx|date=June 2, 2017|title=Center for Scientific Review}} --> | <!-- June 2017 archive of https://public.csr.nih.gov/pages/default.aspx (presently https://public.csr.nih.gov/) : {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170602213233/https://public.csr.nih.gov/pages/default.aspx|date=June 2, 2017|title=Center for Scientific Review}} --> | ||
* [https://www.nih.gov/ NIH website] | * [https://www.nih.gov/ NIH website] | ||
{{ | {{Organization}} | ||
{{ | {{Organization}} | ||
[[Category:National Institutes of Health]] | [[Category:National Institutes of Health]] | ||
Revision as of 11:23, 2 March 2025
Stored: Center for Scientific Review
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) is the portal for United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant applications and their review for scientific merit. The CSR organizes the peer review groups or study sections that evaluate the majority (76%) of the research grant applications sent to NIH.Expansion depth limit exceeded It also receives all grant applications for NIH, as well as for some other components of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Since 1946, its mission has remained clear and timely: to see that NIH grant applications receive fair, independent, expert, and timely reviews—free from inappropriate influences—so NIH can fund the most promising research.
CSR receives nearly 80,000 applications a year and recruits over 19,000 external expertsExpansion depth limit exceeded to review its portion of them in its study sections, which often meet three times during the year. Additional scientists serve on other NIH advisory councils, which provide a second level of peer review and make funding recommendations based on priorities set by the United States Congress, DHHS, and the public.
From 1946 to 1997, the CSR was known as the Division of Research Grants (DRG).
Directors
Past directors from 1946 - presentExpansion depth limit exceeded
| Director | Took office | Left office |
|---|---|---|
| Cassius James Van Slyke | January 1946 | December 1, 1959 |
| David E. Price MD | 1948 | 1950 |
| Ernest M. Allen | 1951 | 1960 |
| Dale R. Lindsay | 1960 | 1963 |
| Eugene A. Confrey | October 1963 | 1969 |
| Stephen P. Hatchett | 1969 | August 1976 |
| Carl D. Douglass | August 1976 | December 1985 |
| Jerome G. Green | January 1986 | June 1, 1995 |
| Ellie Ehrenfeld | January 1997 | September 30, 2003 |
| Brent Stanfield (acting) | October 1, 2003 | June 30, 2005 |
| Antonio Scarpa | July 1, 2005 | September 2, 2011 |
| Richard K. Nakamura | September 18, 2011 | April 30, 2018 |
| Noni Byrnes | February 14, 2019 | Present |
Current initiatives
- Shorten the review process so applicants can revise and resubmit their applications in the next review round if necessary and NIH can more timely fund the best research. Shortening the review process by 45 days could thus reduce the time to resubmit by four months.
- Recruit and retain the best reviewers so NIH and applicants receive the best advice.
- Foster a culture more favorable to innovative applications, so that NIH can fund research that promises larger advances in science and health.
- Address the concern that clinical research is not properly evaluated, so this important research is well represented in the NIH program.
- Increase the transparency, accountability, and uniformity of NIH peer review.Expansion depth limit exceeded
See also
References
Stored: No results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
External links
Stored: No results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stored: No results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stored: No results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stored: No results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||