|
|
| Line 181: |
Line 181: |
| == Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change == | | == Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change == |
| Since 2001, the organization has hosted the senior staff and recent chair, [[Susan Solomon]], of the [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]'s working group on climate science.<ref name="Pearce">[[Fred Pearce|Pearce, Fred]], ''The Climate Files: The Battle for the Truth about Global Warming'', (2010) [[Guardian Books]], {{ISBN|978-0-85265-229-9}}, p. XVIII.</ref> | | Since 2001, the organization has hosted the senior staff and recent chair, [[Susan Solomon]], of the [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]'s working group on climate science.<ref name="Pearce">[[Fred Pearce|Pearce, Fred]], ''The Climate Files: The Battle for the Truth about Global Warming'', (2010) [[Guardian Books]], {{ISBN|978-0-85265-229-9}}, p. XVIII.</ref> |
|
| |
| == Hurricane Dorian controversy ==
| |
| {{Main|Hurricane Dorian|Hurricane Dorian-Alabama controversy}}
| |
| [[Hurricane Dorian]] was an extremely powerful and destructive tropical cyclone that devastated the northwestern Bahamas and caused significant damage to the Southeastern United States and Atlantic Canada in September 2019. By September 1, NOAA had issued a statement saying that the "current forecast path of Dorian does not include Alabama". However, on that date, President Donald Trump tweeted that Alabama, among other states, "will most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated".<ref name="Feldscher">{{Cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/06/politics/noaa-tweet-nws-trump-alabama/index.html|title=NOAA slams weather service tweet that refuted Trump's Alabama claim|publisher=CNN|first=Kyle|last=Feldscher|access-date=September 7, 2019}}</ref><ref name="Embury"/><ref name="guardian-7sep2019"/>
| |
|
| |
| Shortly thereafter, the [[Birmingham, Alabama]] office of the National Weather Service issued a tweet that appeared to contradict Trump, saying that Alabama "will NOT see any impacts from Dorian". On September 6, NOAA published a statement from an unidentified spokesperson supporting Trump's September 1 claim. The statement also labelled the Birmingham, Alabama branch of the National Weather Service's contradiction of Trump as incorrect.<ref name="Feldscher"/><ref name="Embury">{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-map-hurricane-dorian-sharpie-fake-doctored-alabama-noaa-storm-a9092521.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220618/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-map-hurricane-dorian-sharpie-fake-doctored-alabama-noaa-storm-a9092521.html |archive-date=June 18, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Trump forced to deny personally doctoring hurricane map after sharpie spotted on his desk|last1=Embury-Dennis|first1=Tom|date=September 5, 2019|work=The Independent|access-date=September 5, 2019}}</ref><ref name="guardian-7sep2019">{{cite news |title='Sharpiegate': meteorologists upset as weather agency defends Trump's Alabama claim|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/07/sharpiegate-trump-alabama-hurricane-dorian|access-date=September 7, 2019|work=The Guardian |date=September 7, 2019}}</ref> ''The New York Times'' reported that the NOAA September 6 statement was prompted by a threat from U.S. Commerce Secretary [[Wilbur Ross]] to fire high-level NOAA staff unless they supported Trump's claim. The Department of Commerce described this report as "false".<ref name=BBCsack>{{cite news|title=Trump Dorian tweets: Weather staff 'faced sacking threat' over Alabama|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49645498|access-date=September 10, 2019|publisher=BBC News|date=September 10, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/09/climate/hurricane-dorian-trump-tweet.html|title=Commerce Chief Threatened Firings at NOAA After Trump's Dorian Tweets, Sources Say|date=September 9, 2019|work=The New York Times|access-date=September 10, 2019}}</ref>
| |
|
| |
| Meanwhile, ''The Washington Post'' reported that NOAA had twice ordered National Weather Service employees not to provide "any opinion" on Hurricane Dorian and to "only stick with official National Hurricane Center forecasts". The first order came after Trump's September 1 comments and the Birmingham, Alabama National Weather Service's contradiction of Trump. The second order came on September 4 after Trump displayed an August 29 map that was altered with a black marker to show that Hurricane Dorian may hit Alabama.<ref name=Freedman>{{cite news |last1=Freedman|first1=Andrew|last2=Itkowitz|first2=Colby|last3=Samenow|first3=Jason|title=NOAA staff warned in Sept. 1 directive against contradicting Trump |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/noaa-staff-warned-in-sept-1-directive-against-contradicting-trump/2019/09/07/12a52d1a-d18f-11e9-87fa-8501a456c003_story.html|access-date=September 9, 2019 |date=September 7, 2019|newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref>
| |
|
| |
| On September 9, speaking at an Alabama National Weather Service (NWS) meeting the Director of the National Weather Service gave a speech supporting Birmingham NWS and said the team "stopped public panic" and "ensured public safety". He said that when Birmingham issued their instructions they were not aware that the calls they were receiving were a result of Trump's tweet. The acting chief scientist and assistant administrator for the ocean and atmospheric research said he is "pursuing the potential violations" of the agency's scientific integrity policy.<ref>{{cite web|title=NOAA scientist: agency likely broke science integrity rules|url=https://www.apnews.com/e7a4480d33ce4040b59bd48d4b832c05|agency=Associated Press|date=September 9, 2019 |access-date=September 15, 2019}}</ref>
| |
|
| |
|
| == Flag == | | == Flag == |
